Sack arrogant Ponting- Peter Roebuck

Eloquent thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago
#1
Link: https://cricket.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2680841.cms

Sack arrogant Ponting, demands Peter Roebuck
PTI
Print

SYDNEY, January 7: Australia should immediately sack its arrogant and abrasive captain Ricky Ponting and it's a surprise that India has not called off the tour and gone back home, said an aghast Peter Roebuck.

Lambasting the members of the Australian side for their rude behaviour, Roebuck, the former Somerset captain who is based in Sydney, singled out Ponting and said the captain must be sacked.

"If Cricket Australia cares a fig for the tattered reputation of our national team in our national sport, it will not for a moment longer tolerate the sort of arrogant and abrasive conduct seen from the captain and his senior players over the past few days," said the furious former cricketer, also one of the best cricket writers of his era.

"Beyond comparison it was the ugliest performance put up by an Australian side for 20 years," he wrote in his column for 'Sydney Morning Herald'.

"The only surprising part of it is that the Indians have not packed their bags and gone home. There is no justice for them in this country, nor any manners," he observed.

He said the lack of sportsmanship among the Australians hurt their young fans and former players alike.

"Pained past players rang to express their disgust. It was a wretched and ill-mannered display and not to be endured from any side, let alone an international outfit representing a proud sporting nation," Roebuck wrote.

According to him, Ponting and his men had embarrassed Australia through their triumph in the spiteful second Test.

"The notion that Ponting can hereafter take the Australian team to India is preposterous. He has shown not the slightest interest in the well-being of the game... not a single mark of respect for his accomplished and widely admired opponents."

He was no less harsh on the hosts for targeting Harbhajan Singh, who has been slapped a three-match ban for racially abusing Andrew Symonds, a charge the player and his team have vociferously refuted.

"Harbhajan Singh can be an irritating young man but he is head of a family and responsible for raising nine people. And all the Australian elders want to do is to hunt him from the game."

"Australian fieldsmen fire insults from the corners of their mouths, an intemperate Sikh warrior overreacts and his rudeness is seized upon. It might impress barrack room lawyers," he said.

"In the past few days, Ponting has presided over a performance that dragged the game into the pits. He turned a group of professional cricketers into a pack of wild dogs."

Created

Last reply

Replies

7

Views

1k

Users

5

Frequent Posters

*Fiza* thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#2
no i disagree.. Ponting is a great team leader and why shud he be punished for taking side of his team..At the end any player from any side wants thier team to win...ryte? and now they have more pressure of winning since its been played in thier hometown.. Umpires shud be sacked not the players..they shudn't have favoured aussies from the start..
SolidSnake thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#3
Dunno about Ponting but some of the Aussie players should be banned for excessive appealing and trying to put pressure on the vampires. 😆
Edited by SolidSnake - 18 years ago
*Fiza* thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#4
hey nishu!
i agree with u yaar..but players aren't as powerful as umpires... i mean how can a umpire ask a player if he caught the ball or not.. 😕 So i believe umpires were at fault not the players..Umpire's CaNNOT refer to players.. If he was doubtful then why didn't he ask the third umpire... i mean nisha tell me what is the point of having two umpires in a match ? 😕 ..If they can't make right judgement then they shudn't do umpiring.. i hope u understand my point of view.
WillSmith456 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago
#5
mind your language peter idiot
HaUnTeDfReAk thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#6
thank u soo much mr.roebuck 4 tht..eijaz i totally agree wid u..his behaviour sickens me..i used 2 have respect 4 teh aussies sportmanship but nw i think they don't deserve 2 play cirkc8..fiza think abt it yrslef..he knew he was out but he didn't walk..clark knew he was out n he knew he has defiantely grounded the ball but he said he coaught it..think yaar..is this was cirkc8 is all abt..these ppl had started slegding n they r accusing bhajji of accusing symonds..4 heavens sake yaar..
*Fiza* thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: HaUnTeDfReAk

thank u soo much mr.roebuck 4 tht..eijaz i totally agree wid u..his behaviour sickens me..i used 2 have respect 4 teh aussies sportmanship but nw i think they don't deserve 2 play cirkc8..fiza think abt it yrslef..he knew he was out but he didn't walk..clark knew he was out n he knew he has defiantely grounded the ball but he said he coaught it..think yaar..is this was cirkc8 is all abt..these ppl had started slegding n they r accusing bhajji of accusing symonds..4 heavens sake yaar..

but why don't u understand my point.. the role of an umpire is to judge..if a player is sledging or abusing or doing wutever on the pitch than a umpire or the third umpire shud take action against him.. if ur in a class and a student misbehave do u have the authority to punish him??????No.. becuase this is a teacher's duty to either punish that student or warn him..Why shud they sack ponting anyway?.. i can understand ur pain but umpires were being unfair to harbajan and the whole indian team..Why were they taking aussies side in the first place?

HaUnTeDfReAk thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: *Fiza*

but why don't u understand my point.. the role of an umpire is to judge..if a player is sledging or abusing or doing wutever on the pitch than a umpire or the third umpire shud take action against him.. if ur in a class and a student misbehave do u have the authority to punish him??????No.. becuase this is a teacher's duty to either punish that student or warn him..Why shud they sack ponting anyway?.. i can understand ur pain but umpires were being unfair to harbajan and the whole indian team..Why were they taking aussies side in the first place?

c i agree tht teachers or actually umpires need 2 take action but players definately r nt teh ones who should take actions..so in this case ponting should b sacked tht he is thinkin himself like an umpire..he should b sacked so crick8 is a gentlmen's game n he has brought the game into disrepute..he should b sacked coz kumble..a much senior player requested him tht the bhajji isssue should b settled down there itself n nt taken 2 the refree but he did't listen 2 him n nw he is suffering..

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".