Lopu is not a woman of principles

Originally posted by: nehaaa.14

Lopa doesn't take selective stands. If she feels something is not right, she speaks her mind...For e.g. when Rohan punished Manu-Manveer without giving them reasons, she took a stand for them...that too against her own close friend Rohan. If she had not, then you could say that she only take "selective stands".

Lopa have principles...that too plenty. And, nobody follows Lopa blindly...not even Rohan. So, how come she loves/enjoys something which is not even happening?

Originally posted by: lostNfound

So we all know how Lopu like taking stands and how she hates doing things in bhed chaal, something for which she made Rahul dev feel gulity too. But clearly just like many other times, even this stand was a stand of convenience and not based any principle. My problem is not that Lopu takes stands according to convenience but my problem is people projecting her as someone who has principles. She has NONE. Not a bad thing in a game, but something which needs to be underlined.

Clearly she is totally loving the fact that everyone is following her blindly. Goes on to prove that definition of right or wrong for Lopu changes according to convenience.

Also glad that Rohan said "main bheed mai nahi khelta". I am sure till now she was assuming Rohan must have been an add on vote and he would not question her but follow her blindly, but that bubble's popped too. The last time Rohan went against her wishes, she was found breaking crockery.

Originally posted by: lostNfound

So we all know how Lopu like taking stands and how she hates doing things in bhed chaal, something for which she made Rahul dev feel gulity too. But clearly just like many other times, even this stand was a stand of convenience and not based any principle. My problem is not that Lopu takes stands according to convenience but my problem is people projecting her as someone who has principles. She has NONE. Not a bad thing in a game, but something which needs to be underlined.

Clearly she is totally loving the fact that everyone is following her blindly. Goes on to prove that definition of right or wrong for Lopu changes according to convenience.

Also glad that Rohan said "main bheed mai nahi khelta". I am sure till now she was assuming Rohan must have been an add on vote and he would not question her but follow her blindly, but that bubble's popped too. The last time Rohan went against her wishes, she was found breaking crockery.

Originally posted by: SP2684

@bold - all assumptions, and rather baseless, IMO - nothing Lopa did today, indicated that she assumed people would follow her, that she enjoys said pseudo-knowledge, and that she assumed Rohan would blindly follow her vote. He has his own mind - does his own thing. It doesn't mean they always have to agree - two separate things. Was it someone else who pointed out to Manveer that Rohan has his own opinion, which he's entitled to?

As for the Rahul example - she expected that Rahul would support her for captaincy, and she had reasons for those expectations. That he didn't, hurt her, and she felt it was because he went with the herd - which she doesn't like. I don't even see how that factors here - she was asked first today - no question of her following the herd.

As for her breaking crockery (which she should not have done) - she disagreed with Rohan's actions - disagreements are normal, even between friends. BB told Rohan he doesn't need to provide reasons - Lopa didn't agree with him doing that, and they had a fight. In that house, Lopa and Rohan's friendship is definitely not the one based on unreasonable expectations.

@underlined - you clearly are of the opinion that Lopa has no principles, whatsoever, but I see no proof of that - in your post, or on the show. Assumptions, yours or otherwise, prove nothing.

Originally posted by: denver_diva

The Lopa Devi who told Manveer that Rohan has his own opinion was later found sulking about Rohan's own opinion in the live feed. Hope they show it tomorrow. Again, she needs to respect that it was Rohan's own decision to tell or not tell Manveer and she cannot go hysterical. That was not a good way to disagree with a friend - damaging property, yelling screaming and not cooperating with the captainy etc... Why did Lopa not take any stand for her friend when she heard Manu commented on his gender???

Originally posted by: SP2684

I'm afraid I don't watch live feed - did Lopa mention to Rohan/anyone that she's upset about Rohan's opinion? I too hope, that if that is the case, it is shown in tomorrow's episode. But again - knowing that someone is entitled to their opinion, and disagreeing/being upset about their opinion are not mutually exclusive. She can do both - she may be wrong to disagree with his opinion in this instance - but that doesn't mean she expects him to always follow hers. As I said above - two separate things.

I've already mentioned above that I don't agree with Lopa's way of disagreeing in that fight with Rohan - she should not have been breaking crockery. I don't see why the yelling is questioned - she yelled, and Rohan yelled right back. They had an all out fight. Who one supports in the fight was discussed when it happened, and I don't believe it factors here.

Neither have I discussed Lopa's 'stands' - selective or otherwise - I don't see how this topic features, in the context of today's episode. The opening post, that I responded to, made a number of assumptions - about Lopa knowing and enjoying that people, and Rohan especially, follow her lead; that she has no principles whatsoever - and stated that those assumptions were proven today - in my post above, I'm simply questioning the lack of said 'proof'.

What Rohan himself had to say to Manu regarding that gender comment was edited out, I believe - I have no idea what Lopa said/didn't say. I hope she did rebuke Manu - I don't believe she has any reason not to.

Originally posted by: denver_diva

Rohan clearly said BB has told him its his choice whether to give Manveer a reason for dand or not. Lopa went hysterical for no reason, She was trying to hog footage by breaking crockery. It was really a huge reason to pull up such a huge fuss about. Rohan had a choice to say or not say his reason, he chose not to, why is he wrong? she cannot bring the roof down for something so small.

Lopa take selective stands. Why didn't Lopa stand up against Manu when she heard his statement about Rohan being confused about his gender? Why didnt she break crockery again? this was a bigger reason !😉