Chandra- s shamefil act my take

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#1
Hey guys i m on and off viewer of CN and very upset with sudden turn of events ...
.you know about infamous incident between Chandra- Nadini
One question has been bugging me that

How are we going to accept chandra-nadini s romance after whatever happened between them??
I mean how are we supposed to accept and feel nadini love for a man who tortured her??



I agree that woman a position in those times were not good but then also i have never heard or read that chandra gupt maurya or any of the mauryan dishonoured a woman ever

Plus is it right to so such things on television???

Lastly, as a girl i would never tolerate such disgusting acts no matter in which era or in what circumstance it was performed

The history lover in me doesn't allow to appreciate or overlook such stuff which are clearly showing one of her greates kings in bad light

don't you guys think that ekta is destroying one of our historical figures by presenting him in this manner??

Share your thoughts

Edited by adhyakumarijha - 8 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

2.2k

Users

9

Likes

30

Frequent Posters

swathi90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
Nice post adhya👏
I don't see any romance in that scene, that scene makes no sense at all, I think writers r very desperate for trps that they forgot it's national television and there r many people watching this to know about founder of mauryan era, the great emperor CGM.


If it's some tom and dick no one would have bothered about recent so called romance, obviously who cares if it's some normal chandra, no that name they r mentioning s chandra gupta maurya, obviously people who loves history wouldn't want to see the founder of maurya dynasty like this, they r giving wrong impression on people about CGM, I watched this with my family they were astonished to see something like this on CGM, it's obvious anyone would react like that.


And what so called era we r talking about, let's leave this era , which BC wife calls her husband chandra chandra and all, this show, characters r petty modern, so they can't show something like this on tv, ekta lost her mind, just for trp seek there's no need to show something like this on tv.


As a girl I don't support this, marital molest s utterly disgusting, let's not even talk about the era , everyone know all characters r modern here, ya cvs r degrading another historical icon in the name of entertainment.

Edited by swathi90 - 8 years ago
Suitsfan thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
the epi wa bad amine ahoyld complain to bccc and gv waring kid ahyould nt wqtch tgese tgings
nehaaa.14 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#4
I agree. That scene was distasteful. They could have handled it better. I think the writers of the show are confused and they don't know how to move their story forward so they are just experimenting with the script.

About the love story part. I disagree. I think it would be more difficult for a person like Chandra to fall in love with someone like Nandini.
Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#5
I request everybody who has liked my post to share their povs
Thanks

@swati di thanks
Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: nehaaa.14

I agree. That scene was distasteful. They could have handled it better. I think the writers of the show are confused and they don't know how to move their story forward so they are just experimenting with the script.

About the love story part. I disagree. I think it would be more difficult for a person like Chandra to fall in love with someone like Nandini.


Agreed the writers are confused about the plot

I think it will be hard for both
sharmacatty thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: adhyakumarijha

I request everybody who has liked my post to share their povs

Thanks

@swati di thanks


That was just for trps.. Frankly, there are some RT fans who wanted to see rajat "romancing" with his costar so ekta added such scenes. From bathtub scene, haldi rubbing scene and finally this.. everything is just illogical here..

I will not say much about chandra's act as this was completely wrong but what irritated me more is the actress and poor script. First she was trying to kill him and after few moments, " Kya karne wale ho tum mere sath" and few minutes later she was screaming. Fine. 🤓but when he threw her in a bathtub she was all in her sherni mod.. what was that?? She was completely naked that time but she didn't even flinch. How did they end that scene?? with that romantic(irritating) music in background? was that a romantic scene when a couple is trying to strangle their necks?? I mean what was that??😲😲 he molested her and these loosers thought that was romantic. God🥱

After that, chandra and nandini was behaving like nothing had happened.😆
Everything is just so messed up in this show. Ekta did this for Rt fans sake and for TRP and here some "True" Rt fans are not believing that it was not RT in that scene😆 Ekta might have forgotten that simple eye locks and hand locks can bring trps too if the couple has sizzling chemistry on screen.😉






sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#8
Dear Adhya,

This is an interesting post of yours, though you are rather late with it, for there have been about three earlier threads on the same topic, which you can find easily in the forum index, all on the same lines as yours.

The leit motif in all these is that, as was put in a recent post, Nandini is a female who is actively subjugated and controlled by the more powerful male character. So any sexual violence towards her should be considered as an instrument of gender oppression by the privileged and powerful male.

I did not comment on any of them, for I write very little these days outside my own thread unless I am asked to do so. But I remembered our little contretemps in the CAS EDT, and thought that I should welcome you to the CN forum!

Now, if I may offer my twopennyworth without fear of being lynched,😉 here it is.

One, and this seems to have been totally ignored by you and by all the rest in your threads, this was a privileged and powerful male who had just then narrowly escaped being murdered as he slept by the oppressed female - though where she was oppressed till then it is impossible to say, for it was she who agreed to the marriage, not Chandra. It was not a case of his pouncing on her unawares in her room.

Two, the scene, especially the way in which it was shown, reminded me of nothing so much as a schoolboy in an old fashioned school having his trousers taken down before he was caned, only that was deliberately done in public. It did not seem to me to be sexual in any way, it was so ludicrous. Payal's take on it above is spot on in this respect.

Anil (AKT.JA) put it even better when he noted that "the actual act in question was a man forcefully undressing and bathing his wife. At most places and most times, few men or women would have had a desire to do this to their spouse, but if they did do so, the act would have been considered lunatic at worst, but not criminal."

Finally, the very next day, the heroine did not behave as if anything very much had happened to her, and was busy (a) reading a book (b) skinning her knees on an errand of mercy (c) being carried back to her room by her persecutor of the night before (d) having him slather lep over her knees, and finally (e) reporting to her mother about how suspiciously good his behaviour towards her was!

As for your question as to how Nandini can love a man who treated her like this, there is also the other question of how Chandra can come to love a woman who tried repeatedly to kill him, once when he was sleeping trustingly in her room.

Nandini will learn to accept Chandragupta when she understands that her father had sinned so grievously against so many that he deserved to die (when he finally dies, that is!), and that the same would hold for her brothers.

For her to come to love him will need more. She will have to see some very remarkable qualities in Chandragupta.

It will be the same as far as Chandragupta is concerned. Already, after seeing her enthusiasm for books and for learning in general, he softens visibly towards her, and even after her attempt to kill him, he personally brings her a whole lot of books. In fact, a good part of the fury in him after the attempted killing is a contrary reaction to that very softening of the night before.

The script, which resembles nothing so much as a seesaw, is lousy, but the above would have to be the road map for an eventual love story.

This has become too long, so I will stop here. But there is not more than one dear in all of it, as you would have noted, and that too because it is the mandatory opening!😉

Shyamala Aunty




Edited by sashashyam - 8 years ago
myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#9
Dear
I agree with your viewpoint

The time slot is when family views shows together a prime time

Kids, aged, parents may not like watching all scenes

Even adults and teenagers may not appreciate that

Surveys says that after watching violence or any act against woman kids and adults, develop insensitivity and may try such acts

And that scene consisted of molestation and voilation of privacy and such things cannot be shown in prime time

Already in movies and serials a boy chasing a woman repeatedly and harassing her and she finally falling for the guy is shown as love. Hence you have all these eve teasing and molestation and assaults on women and even small kids increasing.

The second point is Chandra gupta was known as a warrior not a womanizer or woman lover. He was not someone who was recorded as lusting after women. His aim was to unite bharat and good administration. So why show any scene that may go exactly against his true nature or his real image.

They have just reduced chanda guptas image in eyes of viewers by showing that scene and rajaths too may be.

I would not like even if nand and maleyketu are shown doing such things on TV, its all implied. You need not show in detail.

And lastly his justification that Nand did it to his mother hence he do to nandini?

And next day both act as if all is normal, nandini never did murder attempt and chandra never humiliated her by disrobing and molesting her


Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Dear Adhya,


This is an interesting post of yours, though you are rather late with it, for there have been about three earlier threads on the same topic, which you can find easily in the forum index, all on the same lines as yours.

The leit motif in all these is that, as was put in a recent post, Nandini is a female who is actively subjugated and controlled by the more powerful male character. So any sexual violence towards her should be considered as an instrument of gender oppression by the privileged and powerful male.

I did not comment on any of them, for I write very little these days outside my own thread unless I am asked to do so. But I remembered our little contretemps in the CAS EDT, and thought that I should welcome you to the CN forum!

Now, if I may offer my twopennyworth without fear of being lynched,😉 here it is.

One, and this seems to have been totally ignored by you and by all the rest in your threads, this was a privileged and powerful male who had just then narrowly escaped being murdered as he slept by the oppressed female - though where she was oppressed till then it is impossible to say, for it was she who agreed to the marriage, not Chandra. It was not a case of his pouncing on her unawares in her room.

Two, the scene, especially the way in which it was shown, reminded me of nothing so much as a schoolboy in an old fashioned school having his trousers taken down before he was caned, only that was deliberately done in public. It did not seem to me to be sexual in any way, it was so ludicrous. Payal's take on it above is spot on in this respect.

Anil (AKT.JA) put it even better when he noted that "the actual act in question was a man forcefully undressing and bathing his wife. At most places and most times, few men or women would have had a desire to do this to their spouse, but if they did do so, the act would have been considered lunatic at worst, but not criminal."

Finally, the very next day, the heroine did not behave as if anything very much had happened to her, and was busy (a) reading a book (b) skinning her knees on an errand of mercy (c) being carried back to her room by her persecutor of the night before (d) having him slather lep over her knees, and finally (e) reporting to her mother about how suspiciously good his behaviour towards her was!

As for your question as to how Nandini can love a man who treated her like this, there is also the other question of how Chandra can come to love a woman who tried repeatedly to kill him, once when he was sleeping trustingly in her room.

Nandini will learn to accept Chandragupta when she understands that her father had sinned so grievously against so many that he deserved to die (when he finally dies, that is!), and that the same would hold for her brothers.

For her to come to love him will need more. She will have to see some very remarkable qualities in Chandragupta.

It will be the same as far as Chandragupta is concerned. Already, after seeing her enthusiasm for books and for learning in general, he softens visibly towards her, and even after her attempt to kill him, he personally brings her a whole lot of books. In fact, a good part of the fury in him after the attempted killing is a contrary reaction to that very softening of the night before.

The script, which resembles nothing so much as a seesaw, is lousy, but the above would have to be the road map for an eventual love story.

This has become too long, so I will stop here. But there is not more than one dear in all of it, as you would have noted, and that too because it is the mandatory opening!😉

Shyamala Aunty





Firstly happy birthday aunty

Coming to the post well as both us we know that we have hardly agreed with each other on something so let us agree to disagree on this too

Regarding your last part i don't thing that the use of word dear is so necessary it is used only for people who we are fond of or when we want to be polite to somebody in a good way ofcourse
Using such endearment s and then going on to mock them is not a very good thing to do is it?!?!
Specially those who have stood by us when nobody did

You see aunty i am very sensitive as a person and in this virtual world where we cannot see people s face i try to be as transparent with my words as i can
My words convey my emotions i mean it
Hence using such words just for the heck of it is not my thing



Edited by adhyakumarijha - 8 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".