The immortal characters of Gangaa

Debashri123 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#1
The show is getting thoda senti and emotional etc. so thought of having some fun...so here, I try and list out some important characters of Gangaa that are not decided in terms of humans but are still primary to the main story: -
(1) Atmasammaaan: - Also known as self-respect, Place of Residence: Ms. Gangaa Shukla's psyche. The most important role of this character is that it defines the heroine and acts as the most lethal weapon in times of adversity. At times, it takes the colour of ego as well...but mostly, very important character in the show...as important as the heroine herself!
(2) Sindooor: - This character appears as a special guest...making special appearances every now & then...it first made its appearance at the Cardio-pulmonary ward of a multi-speciality hospital several years back when Chotu Sagar had to undergo treatment, since then, sometimes, Dadi removes it...Sagar- puts it, Gangaa puts it...Gangaa removes it...basically, they are not sure, of its status. So, sindoor, yes, is a guest appearance character!!
(3) Woh... As in pati-patni aur woh?? This woh or a third angle has been the most important character in determining Gangaa-Sagar dynamics...like always... Sometimes, this angle is Jaanvi or Palaash or Prabha or Krishna or in the upcoming episodes Rudra. Basically, a certain woh is required to create differences and then settle them...our poor mortals, Sagar-Gangaa are quite incapable of sorting things on their own.
(4) (Chaturvedi Brand ki) BEWAKOOFI:- This character provides the comic relief in the show, the Chatur men are genetically same on several things, the most important is Bewakoofi. They can love, care, cry, feeel etc...but poor things cannot trust!! Also, Sagar's ghanti will only ring when there is a heart in the hole or is it otherwise..?? uske pehle my cute adorable puppy-faced Lalla will not be even curious for goood 7 YEARS (please guys don't bash me, I just Love Vishal Vashishtha, I seriously do). Or for that matter my dear Babu, he slept with Rahat but had no idea about the presence of a santaaan. Maane seriously...🤣
(5) Law: - For me, Law has always been in the status of RIP. I find it stuck to the wall in a photo-frame garlanded!! But still it plays a damn interesting character. I really need to know the exact University in London where Sagar (and before him. his Papa Chatur) got his degree from? I am a lawyer myself...and applying in the UK for higher degree in law... just wanted to be a little careful before applying. But seriously, wat legal brain can such a University produce??👏 And Gangaa Maata...even now after becoming lawyer, can't see what major goof-up she has done with Rudra.😆 .

Yeah, so these are some of my characters...tell me if u guys can spot any other interesting character...the only rule is.. it cannot be a person or a mortal being. And also, Y do u think, the character is important 😊
Edited by Debashri123 - 8 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

8

Views

2.6k

Users

6

Likes

18

Frequent Posters

Bridget24 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
I like Ganga's self-respect, every woman should have and use it. I agree with your other points. I thought of a few myself☺️
1/ Reliability:- Sagar's promises mean nothing, he has been known to go back on his word many times with Ganga at the receiving end. She is right to try to protect her daughter from him.
2/ Double Standard:- The Chaturvedi family has one rule for them and another for others. They change theirs believe to suit themselves.
3/ Story Track:- The tracks are prolonged for too long without making sense and then move on without a conclusion.
4/ Tears::- Are we every going to see another episode without Ganga crying??? she's has been crying for about ten months now😆
5/ The Plus:- The acting is first class from all the actors.

Edited by Bridget24 - 8 years ago
Swetha-Sai thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
@TM
Excellent post by u, dear! 👏
Debashri123 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#4
Thanks Shweta...appreciate it!!. Bridget24...Even I like Gangaa's self-respect, what I meant was that these are some of the aspects that are crucial to the Story-line of Gangaa...this important facet contributes to the main story. Even though these are not humans, these qualities have become characters in themselves...I also feel Banaras is a character to the story!! Double standards is another important characteristic...it was just meant to be a fun post!!😊 Take care...😊
rangan11 thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#5
(5) Law: - For me, Law has always been in the status of RIP. I find it stuck to the wall in a photo-frame garlanded!! But still it plays a damn interesting character. I really need to know the exact University in London where Sagar (and before him. his Papa Chatur) got his degree from? I am a lawyer myself...and applying in the UK for higher degree in law... just wanted to be a little careful before applying. But seriously, wat legal brain can such a University produce??👏 And Gangaa Maata...even now after becoming lawyer, can't see what major goof-up she has done with Rudra.😆 .


Debashri,
In reference to the above-mentioned point, I would like to ask u(knowing that u are a lawyer) to shed some light on the topic of child custody which is now going to be shown in the show.
How can a father demand his child's custody when he was legally not even wedded to the child's mother and more importantly, had himself denied the fatherhood and had disowned both the child and mom and had remained separated from them for so long?
As per my practical sense(not legal),knowing this, wouldn't the court automatically reject the case? Or, even after knowing the outcome, the typical Chaturvedi Brand ki) BEWAKOOFI has taken hold of him once again?
Debashri123 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#6
I was actually waiting for the court case to begin...before commenting...but just to state the legal position since u have asked. In the Hindu personal law...Krishna is an illegitimate child...born out of wedlock. Sagar CAN have NO right as he is the putative father. For illegitimate children, mother is the sole guardian. Sec. 6 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act as well as all other personal laws are crystal clear on the point. For custody of an illegitimate child, it is always with the mother (irrespective of the sex of the child- daughter or son).The judge cannot even ask for Krishna's opinion (as in who does she want to stay with) since she is not the legitimate child here. Krishna's position is same as Zoya's vis-a-vis Niru. Zoya is an illegitimate child and she actually has no right over the Chaturvedi's ancestral property etc. Niranjan has simply kept her for humanitarian reasons and can maintain her etc...but she has no legal stand in the Chaturvedi family nor does Krishna.
Also, the blood or DNA test could be done to prove paternity as was done in the famous ND Tiwari case and is a conclusive evidence with respect to paternity. The question of CUSTODY does not arise, and more specifically in Krishna's case. The matter should be dismissed and the proceedings should be quashed in the very first hearing...but no here it will continue...when it cannot and should not. So, yup that is LAW for you...in contrast to the fiction that we are made to watch.😊

Edited by Debashri123 - 8 years ago
rangan11 thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Debashri123

I was actually waiting for the court case to begin...before commenting...but just to state the legal position since u have asked. In the Hindu personal law...Krishna is an illegitimate child...born out of wedlock. Sagar CAN have no right as he is the putative father. For illegitimate children, mother is the sole guardian. Sec. 6 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act as well as all other personal laws are crystal clear on the point. For custody of an illegitimate child, it is always with the mother (irrespective of the sex of the child- daughter or son).The judge cannot even ask Krishna's opinion (as in who does she want to stay with) since she is not the legitimate child here. Krishna's position is same as Zoya's vis-a-vis Niru. Zoya is an illegitimate child and she actually has no right over the Chaturvedi's ancestral property etc. Niranjan has simply kept her for humanitarian reasons and can maintain her etc...but she has no legal stand in the Chaturvedi family nor does Krishna.
Also, the blood or DNA test could be done to prove paternity as was done in the famous ND Tiwari case and is a conclusive evidence with respect to paternity. The question of CUSTODY does not arise, and more specifically in Krishna's case. The matter should be dismissed and the proceedings should be quashed in the very first hearing...but no here it will continue...when it cannot and should not. So, yup that is LAW for you...😊


OOPS!!😛 Kamal ka gyan prapt huya, aj main chain se so paungi!👏
Jokes aside, hmmm, to what I had guessed was not far from Law. This consoles me to a great extent as several questions had raised in my brain. Law or logic doesn't have any connection to this show as par our previous experience, but I am content that legal proceedings follow the right path to justice in this sort of case at least.
Edited by rangan11 - 8 years ago
shirasaini thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: Debashri123

I was actually waiting for the court case to begin...before commenting...but just to state the legal position since u have asked. In the Hindu personal law...Krishna is an illegitimate child...born out of wedlock. Sagar CAN have NO right as he is the putative father. For illegitimate children, mother is the sole guardian. Sec. 6 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act as well as all other personal laws are crystal clear on the point. For custody of an illegitimate child, it is always with the mother (irrespective of the sex of the child- daughter or son).The judge cannot even ask for Krishna's opinion (as in who does she want to stay with) since she is not the legitimate child here. Krishna's position is same as Zoya's vis-a-vis Niru. Zoya is an illegitimate child and she actually has no right over the Chaturvedi's ancestral property etc. Niranjan has simply kept her for humanitarian reasons and can maintain her etc...but she has no legal stand in the Chaturvedi family nor does Krishna.
Also, the blood or DNA test could be done to prove paternity as was done in the famous ND Tiwari case and is a conclusive evidence with respect to paternity. The question of CUSTODY does not arise, and more specifically in Krishna's case. The matter should be dismissed and the proceedings should be quashed in the very first hearing...but no here it will continue...when it cannot and should not. So, yup that is LAW for you...in contrast to the fiction that we are made to watch.😊


great explanation mam...
Mifra_14 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Debashri123

I was actually waiting for the court case to begin...before commenting...but just to state the legal position since u have asked. In the Hindu personal law...Krishna is an illegitimate child...born out of wedlock. Sagar CAN have NO right as he is the putative father. For illegitimate children, mother is the sole guardian. Sec. 6 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act as well as all other personal laws are crystal clear on the point. For custody of an illegitimate child, it is always with the mother (irrespective of the sex of the child- daughter or son).The judge cannot even ask for Krishna's opinion (as in who does she want to stay with) since she is not the legitimate child here. Krishna's position is same as Zoya's vis-a-vis Niru. Zoya is an illegitimate child and she actually has no right over the Chaturvedi's ancestral property etc. Niranjan has simply kept her for humanitarian reasons and can maintain her etc...but she has no legal stand in the Chaturvedi family nor does Krishna.
Also, the blood or DNA test could be done to prove paternity as was done in the famous ND Tiwari case and is a conclusive evidence with respect to paternity. The question of CUSTODY does not arise, and more specifically in Krishna's case. The matter should be dismissed and the proceedings should be quashed in the very first hearing...but no here it will continue...when it cannot and should not. So, yup that is LAW for you...in contrast to the fiction that we are made to watch.😊

R u a lawyer??

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".