NN/SBB updated shagun said pihu to hide her wound from everyone link

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Priya

@priyadarshini.r

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#41

Originally posted by: swatica

Priya di... PERFECT...👏
evrythng at one place...

n so it became an ESSAY...
😆

NO OFFENCE... JST MY POV...🤣

😆😆 Haan Swati. I read all the comments. Instead of quoting each one and replying, I thought I would write an essay to put across all my points and the information I had about the Pooja... That would save some time as well. . Koi baat nahi, I know you guys are used to my essays and would not find it difficult to read. 😳😆

Quote

3fra

@3fra

Sparkler

Posted: 8 years ago

#42

biggest twist all segments pointed to is ishra remarriage condition diffently after bala mother drama this lady always get call to create drama in every functions with out her nutanki nothing could happen

but good if this drama happen front pihu & raman take decision front her which will be last slap on shagun face as pihu will become totally usless weapon in shagun hand which will lead to shagun ignore more pihu in future

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

snehaseshan

@snehaseshan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: bscorp13

Yup sri..that's what I thought too..so why are shagun and mani here😕
And there are so many couples here who can do the puja. .baLA vandu..the Sr iyers..the Sr bhallas..romi mihika..if one were to exclude ishra..then why aliya and adi..I mean drame ke liye kuch bhi., they aren't even engaged to sit in a puja together😕

Exactly if ishita is fine with adi-aalia love that's ok but asking them to sit in Pooja is so wrong.. only couple should d pooja but making adi-aalia sit in puja it totally wrong & wondering how the paati is accepting that thre r so many couples in d family wen d puja is done for Bala's venture the Bala-Vandu shud b sitting y shud adi-aalia sit in their puja.. in our tradition unless boy & girl r engaged they shud not do namaskaram also together here even without getting engaged sitting in puja is so wrong... y do they kill tradition like these in Yhm??

Edited by snehaseshan - 8 years ago

Quote

Priya

@priyadarshini.r

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#44

Originally posted by: snehaseshan

Exactly if ishita is fine with adi-aalia love that's ok but asking them to sit in Pooja is so wrong.. only couple should d pooja but making adi-aalia sit in puja it totally wrong & wondering how the paati is accepting that thre r so many couples in d family wen d puja is dead ne for Bala's venture the Bala-Vandu shud b sitting y shud adi-aalia sit in their puja.. in our tradition unless not & girl r engaged they shud not do namaskaram al together here even without getting engaged sitting in puja is so wrong... y do they kill tradition like these in Yhm??

Sneha, I have known some people in our customs, who have had satya narayana pooja in the morning and their engagement that day evening. I'm not sure if they have modernized, but it has happened and even a priest conducted it. So may be our CVs are influenced from someone like that😆. But the pooja is not done by couples alone. It can be done by even people who are single. I have seen them do it personally, one guy for a new business and another girl did it as a prarthana for her marriage. Hence thought of sharing it with you. Hope you did not take offence.

You are right about the point that the boy & girl do not do namaskarams together unless they are engaged. May be they will do namaskarams separately or it is considered OK as far as YHM TamBrahm culture is concerned😆. They have royally butchered every tambrahm rituals and this is not new to them. 😆

Quote

Bhuvana

@manishwari2014

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#45

Priya, time has changed a lot of things in tambrahms also. During my marriage, my mil refused to keep the reception the previous day stating that after marriage only, the couple can stand together for reception. But now reception is always on the previous day of marriage which saves both time and money.

Quote

Priya

@priyadarshini.r

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#46

Originally posted by: manishwari2014
Priya, time has changed a lot of things in tambrahms also. During my marriage, my mil refused to keep the reception the previous day stating that after marriage only, the couple can stand together for reception. But now reception is always on the previous day of marriage which saves both time and money.

Exactly Bhuvana. While some of them stick to these customs and traditions as-is even today, some of them have tailored these customs and traditions over years as well and the priests are also OK with it. May be what I shared, is one such instance.😊.

Quote

Rivka

@Rivka

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#47

what kind of dressing is that for kid.
Kids in south india wear pattu pavada. that is long blouse and pattu long skirt. Not half saree or a saree. always cv's forget ruhanika's age. now see what ruhi is wearing. Y cant Cv's differentiate the ages with dressing.

Pattu pavada for Pihu

half saree for ruhi

Saree - alia.

that's like south Indian .
This is mockery of South Indian Traditions.

Quote

snehaseshan

@snehaseshan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#48

Originally posted by: priyadarshini.r

Sneha, I have known some people in our customs, who have had satya narayana pooja in the morning and their engagement that day evening. I'm not sure if they have modernized, but it has happened and even a priest conducted it. So may be our CVs are influenced from someone like that😆. But the pooja is not done by couples alone. It can be done by even people who are single. I have seen them do it personally, one guy for a new business and another girl did it as a prarthana for her marriage. Hence thought of sharing it with you. Hope you did not take offence.

You are right about the point that the boy & girl do not do namaskarams together unless they are engaged. May be they will do namaskarams separately or it is considered OK as far as YHM TamBrahm culture is concerned😆. They have royally butchered every tambrahm rituals and this is not new to them. 😆

Not at all Priya no offence in stating examples. I know in real life also there r so many adjustments & alterations done in d traditions. I was not aware that couple without getting engaged can do pooja together but yes as u say single ppl doing is fine but girl and boy sitting together for d puja is wrong without engaged as far as I know coz as per my knowledge after engagement only boy & girl are considered as couple not before that they can perform separately bu together it shud not b done but yes wen ppl change traditions in real life then writers can also change it for drama too,can't say anything

Edited by snehaseshan - 8 years ago

Quote

snehaseshan

@snehaseshan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#49

Originally posted by: manishwari2014
Priya, time has changed a lot of things in tambrahms also. During my marriage, my mil refused to keep the reception the previous day stating that after marriage only, the couple can stand together for reception. But now reception is always on the previous day of marriage which saves both time and money.

Very true Bhuvana