🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M3: IND vs USA at Mumbai on 07/02/26🏏
Republic Rhythms: Aazadi Quest S2 ~ Round 4 -- Slot 2
Republic Rhythms: Aazadi Quest S2 ~ Round 4 -- Slot 3
FIGHT FOR LAND 6.2
TRAUMA&AFFECTS 7.2
🏏England U19 vs India U19, Final, ICC Under 19 World Cup 2026🏏
ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M1: NED vs PAK at Colombo on 07/02/26
Republic Rhythms: Aazadi Quest S2 ~ Round 4 -- Slot 1
Which is your favourite Ranbir Kapoor movie?
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M2: SCO vs WI at Kolkata on 07/02/26🏏
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 39
Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham 2 Updates
Paan ki Dukaan - O Romeo NEW Song
Naseeruddin Shah Irritated On Times Now Reporter
Tamasha-is this the right word😡
Parshuram Vs. Shivprasad
ETA : If what you say is right and BOI is indeed the most credible for numbers with nothing else coming close, then it's sad that it has such poorly written and vague articles.
Originally posted by: rogerrocks
The hypocrisy of ppl who trash commercial and art films..One side says it is boring and trash and no one cares for them and other side says only unintelligent folks watch masala films..Yet they dont realize how they are doing exactly what they accuse the other side of..Judging their taste and not letting ppl be..More than art films and commercial films, its just good cinema and bad cinema at the end of the day..Stop being judgmental just because you dont like something..
Originally posted by: Deathstroke
Today its not much different, a Badlapur, Haider or NH 10 can survive because the main talents are hardly being paid or taking huge cuts in the remuneration. Then on top its said these films are appreciated but how can these films be appreciated if hardly anybody has seen them. None crossed 50 lakh footfalls in theatres and less said about television results the better. You can only have appreciation if you have an audience. The longevity in the golden era was measured through repeat runs and today that has been replaced by television.
when you know footfall pattern has changed over time, then for what f*** sake you take footfalls and multiply by average ticket price to arrive at collections for movies like HAHK and other blockbusters in 90s?
when you know footfall pattern has changed over time, then for what f*** sake you take footfalls and multiply by average ticket price to arrive at collections for movies like HAHK and other blockbusters in 90s?
Originally posted by: ChingumSir
That is adjusted inflation figures, that doesn't mean actual collection. It is done by all box office websites, boxofficemojo also does that in same way. Gone with the wind is biggest film when you see inflation figures.http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htmCurrent domestic record holder star wars isn't in top 10, you can see their calculation also based on this concept.
i m not very sure but based on my memory, i beg to differ... when i checked last in a post from lakhan quoting BOI data it was footfalls multiplied by avg ticket price currently... avg ticket price currently will take care of inflation but then the business has changed to the extent that footfall needs to be revised downwards..
Originally posted by: .Lakhan.
Mujhe jaad kiya tumne😆Buddy Footfalls of FILM remains as it is, footfalls which BOI is talking is about current films. You can't ask them to multiply footfalls of current films with Ticket price. Adjusted inflation comes when u multiply that particular film's Footfalls to ATP.ATP - It is taken today's priceFilm - footfalls - When it is released, it is FIXED.ATP changes every year, so does inflation change.
https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=9551
https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=9542
https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=9528
https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=9518
BOI reporting numbers till yesterday - BOI revised numbers today (look at week 1) - More besharmi and backtracking from BOI in the artcle - from...
0