public voting does not make sense

disclaimer : personally i am not a fan of any particular person. so my comments are just observations. not emotionally written as a reaction to events.

When ronit got out because he performed not so well that week and it was said that public votes based on that week and the judges comments. then what happened to that logic this week. sonali gave a good performance as compared to negi. shouldn't logically he be the one to get out. doesn't make sense at all. what the public is looking at.

This whole thing of liking someone as a character and then voting for them is sad. someone is sweet so she/he deserves to win. what is one got to do with the other. it is understandable people develop a kind of affinity for these TV characters to vote on their dancing based on it.

sudha was amazing and went out so early in the race. negi is nice and his improvement is not bad. but does he deserve to be in final four. i doubt it.

for sonali to lose her spot because prachi came in, this makes sonali losing even more wrong. if they had stuck to the rules. it could have been a different story.

In the Dancing with Stars in the US this year they lost the most amazing dancer Sabrina. but she wasn't brought back.

Public Vote is not based on performances actually 😕 ..Either the Junta votes for their favourite Contestent irrespective of whether he/she is good or bad Or they Vote on the basis of Sympathy ..Like right now Public is showing their Sympathy towards Negi due to the Chak De fever ...

Thats why I think this Public Voting System should hv some basic Rules and Limitations to make it as fair as possible 😊

I do not get the way public or the votes for show works..it should be like english shows first public votes for the lowest two then judges get a say since more likely they will save the best one 😊

i think voting is all farce
there is no accountablity
who knows whats happening
i personally feel that winner is all decided before
and ppl r eliminated accordingly

its all scripted
thats all
and some dancers r good some r average
if we look just for entertainment its fine

thas my views

Originally posted by: avadvani

disclaimer : personally i am not a fan of any particular person. so my comments are just observations. not emotionally written as a reaction to events.

When ronit got out because he performed not so well that week and it was said that public votes based on that week and the judges comments. then what happened to that logic this week. sonali gave a good performance as compared to negi. shouldn't logically he be the one to get out. doesn't make sense at all. what the public is looking at.

This whole thing of liking someone as a character and then voting for them is sad. someone is sweet so she/he deserves to win. what is one got to do with the other. it is understandable people develop a kind of affinity for these TV characters to vote on their dancing based on it.

sudha was amazing and went out so early in the race. negi is nice and his improvement is not bad. but does he deserve to be in final four. i doubt it.

for sonali to lose her spot because prachi came in, this makes sonali losing even more wrong. if they had stuck to the rules. it could have been a different story.

In the Dancing with Stars in the US this year they lost the most amazing dancer Sabrina. but she wasn't brought back.

Oh my god! Sabrina lost:( She was AWESOME. And, ya breaking of rules for your own convenience, "this happens only in India"😉