Today's Episode: Hits and Misses/ DT Nt pg 2

LadyMcbeth thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#1
Hits: Ram & Sita reprimanding Shurpankha for misinterpreting their statements. For one moment I thought would Sita give in to Shurpankha's appeal to her... it was an ultimate and diplomatic move by Shurpankha. Sita is a woman. A woman can empathize with another woman's feelings, particularly a sensitive woman like Sita. So when a diabolical woman like Shurpankha was trying to drive a wedge between Ram and Sita, using fake empathy as her weapon, Sita did not waver. She did not barter Ram away impulsively.

I am saying this, because in another mythological serial I am currently watching, Parvati falls prey to this mistake when her dearest friend, Indra's daughter, Jayadri falls in love with Mahadev. Parvati impulsively grants her a boon of becoming Mahadev's ardha-bharya (half-wife) in next birth. In next birth when Parvati too is reborn, she is condemned to a life of sharing Mahadev's avatar with another wife. Even worse, she doesn't recall her base form as Parvati. Neither does she recall Jayadri, nor does she recall ever granting her a boon. Life becomes a living hell for Parvati's reincarnation, constantly being angry, jealous, sad, suspicious yet unable to do anything about it! Whereas, Mahadev's avatar has to bear the brunt of Parvati's boon. People usually empathize with Jayadri's reincarnation because Parvati's reincarnation treats her with contempt. But I truly feel sorry for Parvati's reincarnation for having to watch her husband being shared by another woman.

Another high point for me was Lakshman - He was genuinely concerned for Sita when she sprained her ankle, was willing to bear the sin of murdering a woman for the sake of his brother and sister-in-law and ultimately threw the weapon in Shurpankha's direction to protect his loved ones!

Misses: Ram not recognizing that something is off with Sita. They are supposed to be soul mates, correct? Sita and Lakshman arriving at the cottage in nick of time to save Ram from eating that aphrodisiac fruit. Sita realizes something is wrong, but Ram doesn't? Bit much? Sita running behind Shurpankha, telling her to kill her instead to take her revenge and trying to reason with her convoluted logic and blaming Lakshman. Complete miss! If anyone had a right to say anything to Lakshman, it was Ram, not Sita! Babe, he saved you from that lady-monster who was coming to kill you & had plans to deceitfully defile Ram, remember? What is it with Sita and Lakshman anyway? Looks like she is barely tolerating him for the sake of Ram... either the dialogues are way off or the actress is giving that impression - unbelievable! Creatives need to do something about Sita's attitude towards Lakshman pronto! It is becoming more and more obvious that she is uncomfortable with Lakshman's presence.

Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

1.6k

Users

8

Likes

34

Frequent Posters

pri_tanvi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#2
Can't agree more. You have very rightly pointed out the hits and misses of the epi. My views are the same. Though i liked Madirakshi's performance as the duplicate Sita. But this entire track has left me disappointed. Firstly, this is completely different from the known Ramayan versions. Secondly, i also thought, how come Shri Ram couldn't recognize Surpanakha! The entire thing appeared very daily soapish!! And yes Sita running after Surpi to apologise and asking her to kill her take her revenge disappointed me. By asking her to kill, you are undermining all efforts of Ram and Lakshman to save you!
attubaby thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: pri_tanvi

Can't agree more. You have very rightly pointed out the hits and misses of the epi. My views are the same. Though i liked Madirakshi's performance as the duplicate Sita. But this entire track has left me disappointed. Firstly, this is completely different from the known Ramayan versions. Secondly, i also thought, how come Shri Ram couldn't recognize Surpanakha! The entire thing appeared very daily soapish!! And yes Sita running after Surpi to apologise and asking her to kill her take her revenge disappointed me. By asking her to kill, you are undermining all efforts of Ram and Lakshman to save you!


same here...very much liked Madirakshi's performance as shurpi disguised as Sita👏. On a lighter note, look how convincing she was in her acting and it might be the reason that Shri Ram also couldn't recognize her at once 😆 (ok pun intended here)

disappointment was Sita running after Shurpnakha, sayin sorry and sayin she can kill her if that satisfies her revenge.
Paridhi_Sharma thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#4
good post dear..😊

by watchng the episodes of skr till now..i can confidently conclude it by saying tht.."SIYA KE RAM is a FICTIONAL SHOW"...in no sense it cn b considered to b a MYTHOLOGICAL SHOW..
adding a bit of new things here n there in the original mytho story is okay..👍🏼 but the exact opposite thing i.e. adding the original mytho story here n there in a totally new made-up story is utterly a blunder! 👎🏼

they'v made a real mockery of goddess sita & lakshman's relationship frm the vry beginning..👎🏼 they'v made goddess sita cmpltly reverse of wat she ws..👎🏼 they've made her too inquisitive..way too mch..too nosy..too arguable..👎🏼

the blunder ws the whole track leading to surpanakha's nose cutting by lakshman..seeing the track,the frst qs tht was raised in my mind ws.."that means,did we all know the wrong ramayan till now?" 😲 👎🏼 i wonder wat the new generation kids wl learn abt RAMAYAN if they watch ths FICTIONAL show..🤓

jus bcz it's frm SITA's perspective,u cnt show a different ramayan altogether..😆 clearly,THEY'RE MAKING A BIG MOCKERY OF "RAMAYAN"..👎🏼 😵

this is why 80% of ppl r not bein able to connect to SKR..particularly wd SITA (considering it is frm SITA's perspective)..nd this is y the same percentage of ppl compares SKR wd RAMANAND SAGAR'S RAMAYAN of the 80's..bcz the earlier one ws jus PERFECT! 😳

i started wtchng SKR following the 2013 series of "Mahabharat" whch ws PHENOMENAL 👏 ,just like the previous MAHABHARAT of B.R. CHOPRA of the 80's..😊 2013 MB evn ws a trp topper all the way till it's end & it ws perfect in everything..👏 MB made me strt wtchng SKR..😊 bt sorry to say,SKR turned out to b a blunder! 😒

the CV's bttr buck up & start showing the original "RAMAYAN" & transform it to a MYTHOLOGICAL show frm a FICTIONAL one..no doubt the trp's r low! no offense!
Edited by Paridhi_Sharma - 9 years ago
1Rockstar1 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: Paridhi_Sharma

good post dear..😊

by watchng the episodes of skr till now..i can confidently conclude it by saying tht.."SIYA KE RAM is a FICTIONAL SHOW"...in no sense it cn b considered to b a MYTHOLOGICAL SHOW..
adding a bit of new things here n there in the original mytho story is okay..👍🏼but the exact opposite thing i.e. adding the original mytho story here n there in a totally new made-up story is utterly a blunder!👎🏼

they'v made a real mockery of goddess sita & lakshman's relationship frm the vry beginning..👎🏼they'v made goddess sita cmpltly reverse of wat she ws..👎🏼they've made her too inquisitive..way too mch..too nosy..too arguable..👎🏼

the blunder ws the whole track leading to surpanakha's nose cutting by lakshman..seeing the track,the frst qs tht was raised in my mind ws.."that means,did we all know the wrong ramayan till now?"😲👎🏼i wonder wat the new generation kids wl learn abt RAMAYAN if they watch ths FICTIONAL show..🤓

jus bcz it's frm SITA's perspective,u cnt show a different ramayan altogether..😆clearly,THEY'RE MAKING A BIG MOCKERY OF "RAMAYAN"..👎🏼😵

this is why 80% of ppl r not bein able to connect to SKR..particularly wd SITA (considering it is frm SITA's perspective)..nd this is y the same percentage of ppl compares SKR wd RAMANAND SAGAR'S RAMAYAN of the 80's..bcz the earlier one ws jus PERFECT!😳

i started wtchng SKR following the 2013 series of "Mahabharat" whch ws PHENOMENAL 👏,just like the previous MAHABHARAT of B.R. CHOPRA of the 80's..😊2013 MB evn ws a trp topper all the way till it's end & it ws perfect in everything..👏MB made me strt wtchng SKR..😊bt sorry to say,SKR turned out to b a blunder!😒

the CV's bttr buck up & start showing the original "RAMAYAN" & transform it to a MYTHOLOGICAL show frm a FICTIONAL one..no doubt the trp's r low! no offense!

Dear, SP Mahabharat was more mess than SKR! though MB had good trps it was no where near to the original Epic, they had been huge cry and protest abt SP MB too, you should watch the Dyuy Sabba, during Draupadi Vastra haran, the Pandavas were completely white washed and all blame was put to Duryodhan and Kauravas, no where in the original Epic he gambled his brother's and wife, but here it was shown so that cvs get ample opportunity to glorify Pandavas, Gambling was Yudhi's weakness, he gambled away everything including his wife as per his wish no where he was helpless, similarly even Karna death time, the cvs showed Pandavas and and Karna reconciling, which wasn't as per Epic.
SP MB might have had good trps compared to SKR, but it wasn't 'coz they stick to original Epic.
Shliya thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: Paridhi_Sharma

good post dear..😊

by watchng the episodes of skr till now..i can confidently conclude it by saying tht.."SIYA KE RAM is a FICTIONAL SHOW"...in no sense it cn b considered to b a MYTHOLOGICAL SHOW..
adding a bit of new things here n there in the original mytho story is okay..👍🏼 but the exact opposite thing i.e. adding the original mytho story here n there in a totally new made-up story is utterly a blunder! 👎🏼

they'v made a real mockery of goddess sita & lakshman's relationship frm the vry beginning..👎🏼 they'v made goddess sita cmpltly reverse of wat she ws..👎🏼 they've made her too inquisitive..way too mch..too nosy..too arguable..👎🏼

the blunder ws the whole track leading to surpanakha's nose cutting by lakshman..seeing the track,the frst qs tht was raised in my mind ws.."that means,did we all know the wrong ramayan till now?" 😲 👎🏼 i wonder wat the new generation kids wl learn abt RAMAYAN if they watch ths FICTIONAL show..🤓

jus bcz it's frm SITA's perspective,u cnt show a different ramayan altogether..😆 clearly,THEY'RE MAKING A BIG MOCKERY OF "RAMAYAN"..👎🏼 😵

this is why 80% of ppl r not bein able to connect to SKR..particularly wd SITA (considering it is frm SITA's perspective)..nd this is y the same percentage of ppl compares SKR wd RAMANAND SAGAR'S RAMAYAN of the 80's..bcz the earlier one ws jus PERFECT! 😳

i started wtchng SKR following the 2013 series of "Mahabharat" whch ws PHENOMENAL 👏 ,just like the previous MAHABHARAT of B.R. CHOPRA of the 80's..😊 2013 MB evn ws a trp topper all the way till it's end & it ws perfect in everything..👏 MB made me strt wtchng SKR..😊 bt sorry to say,SKR turned out to b a blunder! 😒

the CV's bttr buck up & start showing the original "RAMAYAN" & transform it to a MYTHOLOGICAL show frm a FICTIONAL one..no doubt the trp's r low! no offense!



Agreed !! In fact it's wrong. Sita reiterating every now and then that bcoz of lakshman's actions they will have to pay its like blaming him for the entire kidnapping incident that will follow. The new generation will know of a Ramayan where the kidnapping took place bcoz lakshman "insulted" a woman.
Paridhi_Sharma thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: 1Rockstar1

Dear, SP Mahabharat was more mess than SKR! though MB had good trps it was no where near to the original Epic, they had been huge cry and protest abt SP MB too, you should watch the Dyuy Sabba, during Draupadi Vastra haran, the Pandavas were completely white washed and all blame was put to Duryodhan and Kauravas, no where in the original Epic he gambled his brother's and wife, but here it was shown so that cvs get ample opportunity to glorify Pandavas, Gambling was Yudhi's weakness, he gambled away everything including his wife as per his wish no where he was helpless, similarly even Karna death time, the cvs showed Pandavas and and Karna reconciling, which wasn't as per Epic.
SP MB might have had good trps compared to SKR, but it wasn't 'coz they stick to original Epic.


i hv wtchd SP MB frm 1st epi till the last..i agree tht thr wr a few "made-up" scenes whch r not thr in the real MAHABHARAT..lyk u mentioned abt the post karna death scene..bt lyk i mentioned,adding a bit of new things here n there in the original epic story is bearable..but adding the original epic in a cmpltly new "made-up" mytho turned fictional story is unbearable! ...whch SKR is doing..so yes,MB was stuck to the original epic..😊 unlike SKR..adding quite a few new things to make the whole epic story more dramatic is still fine..but cmpltly changing the epic is..sorry to say..like a sin!

since it's SKR forum i cnt say much..bt i cn say ths much tht gambling requires bth the parties to put money or whatever at stake agnst one another..nd i have a big fat book on the epic MB in bengali version,so yes..bhanumati ws put on stake agnst draupadi..
_radharani_ thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: LadyMcbeth


I am saying this, because in another mythological serial I am currently watching, Parvati falls prey to this mistake when her dearest friend, Indra's daughter, Jayadri falls in love with Mahadev. Parvati impulsively grants her a boon of becoming Mahadev's ardha-bharya (half-wife) in next birth. In next birth when Parvati too is reborn, she is condemned to a life of sharing Mahadev's avatar with another wife. Even worse, she doesn't recall her base form as Parvati. Neither does she recall Jayadri, nor does she recall ever granting her a boon. Life becomes a living hell for Parvati's reincarnation, constantly being angry, jealous, sad, suspicious yet unable to do anything about it! Whereas, Mahadev's avatar has to bear the brunt of Parvati's boon. People usually empathize with Jayadri's reincarnation because Parvati's reincarnation treats her with contempt. But I truly feel sorry for Parvati's reincarnation for having to watch her husband being shared by another woman.


This sounds so interesting, may I ask which serial this is from?
I love mythological shows. I'm hoping they re-run Devon Ke Dev Mahadev from LifeOk in the future, I would like to watch it from start to finish for the Shiva-Parvati stories.



mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#9
Note:

Siya Ke Ram Forum Rules-Read Before Posting

Comparison of Past Shows/Other Versions: No comparisons of other versions of Ramayan aired on television/movie will be allowed. This also means comparing actors of previous shows with current ones and the way track was presented in the other version cannot be discussed upon. Also discussions about other mythological shows and characters will not be allowed in SKR forum.

No discussion on past shows that the actors of this show have been in can be discussed. This also means no discussion on how a previous actor(ess) that has acted with the actor(ess) in Siya Ke Ram can be discussed or compared upon. Do do not bring in irrelevant topics/characters/comparison with other shows.

SKR DT


LadyMcbeth thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#10
Note to DT: My post wasn't intended to compare between any mythological shows. I was drawing a parallel between Parvati and Sita's behavior. I am pretty sure that is not irrelevant. Not sure what you mean!
Edited by LadyMcbeth - 9 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".