Wild cards and original contestants are not equal ... - Page 4

Originally posted by: PriyaRv

GOSH itna cricket --- cricket is a team game and bigg boss is a individuals game and I guess they are not comparable, in terms of entertainment everyone has a right to choose who they want to win, but we should not confuse that with the fact they are not equal --- Wild cards have an excessive undue advantage to make the show more entertaining as tipped off by the BB team tactics besides knowing the strengths and weakness of other contestants. I see it as a channel's fault to choose people who cant deliver its not the individuals fault, besides every season wild cards are introduced -- according to me they are like flavouring agents in any menu in very simple terms...

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

You took it literally

Team: Contestants

Objective: Overall Impact on audience

Coach BB

Audience is selecting the man / woman of the match

Honestly wish I can accept the above explanation and comparision ...

Now someone who came first is there for more time but maybe he or she did not impact the audience much and therefore audience don't have to choose him or her just because he or she was there from the start.

basic issue here is the original contestants were not given a chance to entertain the audience as the wild cards did ,as they were given any clue about the about game tactics, no idea about weakness of the other contestants and above all, they were not facilitated by BB team to bully and mock other contestants like the way these wild cards were given a free hand to do so,

at the time of introduction of wild cards people were fed up for various reasns, boring Rimis antics, fed up with Kish groupism and her act of spitting etc ..people felt good punishing Kish with the dog task, Rishab was so cruel in that task when he enetered and cruelty for me as a normal human being was an is never ever going to be be enteritaning, despite the fact Kish was wrong in her doings...

In the end efficiency, talent, winning quality is not that you stay there for whole time but you impact audience such that they end up choosing you. If it was all about rewarding the longest then we might as well stop all this and give it to the person who entered first in the house

absolutely entertainment should be gauged by the original ideas of the contestants and not by false entertainment value facilitated by BB team provided by the wild cards, that's what makes me unhappy that WCs have an undue advantage ..

However staying longer has some value in audience mind. They might say that okay openers need more stamina or they faced the fast bowlers but then one can say they were longest and had more chance to score.

I can understand you love cricket but I love tennis, its like in a match between 2 great players audience are bored and one of them is tired so lets bring in enterianment with a new player, its so unfair for the original player who is absolutely dead tired after a gruelling session.. wild cards have undue advantage with abundant physical reserve and resilence to deal with the physical and emotional turmoil in that house which makes it unequal for the original contestants...

There is tendency to dislike people who come late and we think that oh they are free loaders and I get that but still cutoff for that should be very late like Geizelle. I dont think Priya and Rishab came that late. Also those who came earlier they made more money also ...

I believe wild card can be a worthy winner if that person through his or her impact overcomes the free loader effect please elaborate if you can, how they can ever do that when they are treated in a special way by the BB team in introducing them as entertainers and in reality they have a zero value as it not their original idea...and for Priya and Rishab its not big of a problem because they did not come that later... I hear Rishab came in 3rd week and Priya half way through the game Day 47 or something...Problem is Rishab's impact value is 0 however Priya can do it, they probably can and will , but in my eyes they will be unworthy winners as they didn't compete in the standardised environment of emotional physical conditions which the original members endured.