Why Justify Either Of Them?

Those people who justify DD's action and bash Simran are utter fools! BOTH of them are alike with no contrast. Both are selfish, egoistic, manipulator and chameleon. Both can go to depth taking drastic decision to prove their obsessive love for their children.

Points:

1. DD after knowing Shabby's truth accused Siddarth for touching Patel family's izzat. When she very well knew Sid loves Roshni dearly and even in his dreams he won't dare to take the step. She didn't even trust her own daughter; disowned her right away when Roshni supported him.

Simran did the same when her son begged her to believe him but she did not listen. she was just angry at the circumstances; was disgusted at the Patels for ruining their Son's reputation in front of the whole world because her son gave up his entire life serving his sasural but in return what he got, only abuses.

2. After her son's death, only Simran's reaction was realistic, portrayed as lifeless, shocked but again hated Roshni to satisfy her mental self. After a while, vanished with her hubby forgetting that her son just died, didn't bother to look for his dead body and without proper investigation assumed he was murdered by DD.

But what did DD do? Not even a single grief when she heard that her Jamai was murdered. This lady is stone made without heart. Even Vampires have heart but at least she is human. Forgot about sorrow, she didn't even inquire about Sid being dead.

3. When Roshni disclosed about Sid's imposter to DD. She was happy because she knew she was getting herself out the jail mansion not because he was alive. She manipulated her own daughter to invite a a stranger in her bedroom and make him Sid to avenge Sid's death but in reality she wanted to release from jail.

Simran out of skyland, reaches town with her hubby after knowing Sid is alive. She was enjoying her honeymoon days when she was suppose to look for her son and punish the criminal. Now the girl, who ruined her son's reputation becomes beta out of sudden.

So in all those cases both of them are immoral and I don't see any justification of their actions. If DD and Simran would have supported sidni in their difficulties then they wouldn't have to go thorough this trauma.

BUT for once I agree with Simran's word to DD that the family doesn't deserve Sid as Jamai. I know we have had discussions about who deserves whom but this is not about SidNi. It's about the family I'm talking about. And I will proudly say Patel's do not deserve a JAMAI like Sid.

Now I wanna see who is the fool that comes to my post and says DD acts like human and Simran is gone case. Because in my eyes both mothers are BAD and why justify their action.

Originally posted by: Aayu27

Frankly speaking Mona ,DD ,Sam and Simran all are the same! Alike in actions as well as the tendency to change colours is so fast that if you try justifying their actions you are a fool because the next moment the actions will be a complete turn around!

So I have applied a simple action plan for these 4 people's scenes,just think of it as needed for the script and don't try to put much thought in their actions and words.!

Because one day I will say Simran was behaving sensitively when Siddharth dies but her sensitivity died at the moment she went away spending her lala time with her hubby just like you mentioned. And then we will say one fine day that DD is a nice lady because she knows Shabnam's evil intentions well but then again we will remember how she had accused Siddharth of molesting the same Shabnam.

So defending anyone is purely idiotic.

Originally posted by: ChandzLoveSidNi

oh god now there are DD and Simran fans also😲😲 i would say all khuranas and patels are pagals 😆😆

Originally posted by: paru10

Simple is that Chandu Roshni fans are big DD fan. People would jump justifying DD saying she acts like human lol 😆

Originally posted by: ChandzLoveSidNi

DD acts like humanif they support DD bcoz she is her mom..they should support sid as he is her hubby na😲😲