Have not voted in this poll.
Replacxements work if there is a lot more scope for the character to grow and evolve as the story progresses or if a large part of the story itself remained untold at the time of replacement.
It is the scope the character has in the context of the story that is being told decides whethere replacement works or not.
Gauri's replacement came in too late when the character itself became irrelevant in the context of the story.Had replacement happened when Jagya Gauri story was at the peak the replacement would have been accepted and in my opinion Jagya's story would have been lot more interesting with Gauri around.
As for Jagya what is the scope for this character post leap and what is the contribution to the story?
Sure they could have used BH couple to tell a story of busy parents and their children. But beyond that what is there to show through them?
But the fact is that the main story now has moved to Anandi and Nandini and her sasural where Singhs don't have much of a role except as onlookers just like Anandi is just an onlooker in Ratan Ganga and Mannu with no say in the procedings
How ever much we like Singhs their characters have become bit players and another family has taken centre stage and they are dealing with issues which they have not dealt with before.Even Anandi is connected to this story only remotely because it is happening in her daughter's life.This story is managing to grab eye balls and imagination - so this is being shown in great detail.Leaving very little place for BH people.
With the story taking a different direction what is the scope for his character ?
Don't know whether replacement will work.