deepika and kangana are not superstars

The film had good content and thats why it worked. Queen was very different and very well made film so people went to see. Kangana did Rajjo, Revolver Rani, Ungli and no one gave a crap. Rajjo didn't even cover the cost of posters in metro city.

No they are not..What they have achieved for themselves is that they can greenlight a medium budget film for themselves.A producer should not find it difficult to cast a good actor in it..depending on the genre..Directors like imtiaz,homi,basu,vikas bahl,would be able to get more money and make a bigger film.

If there are 2 proposals for a Khan film..and say,Deepika who hasn't signed any film,shows an interest in one of them..in all probability,that directors film will get made...

No, they are not.
Only 3 khans are. And to some extent Hrithik... that bangbang was a mediocre film but earned a lot 🤓

the term 'superstar' is misused highly these days ... kisiko bhi superstars bula lete hai

I have to agree with you. I had a huge argument with my siblings over this (yeah, I am a loser, I know! ).

Does Kangana have a good onscreen presence? NO
Can she deliver her dialogues well? NO

The same applies to the wooden-faced beauty, Deepika. So, on what basis should they be considered superstars. Their movies work well only because of the script and the content. Truly said!

I'm The Real Superstar I Earn 15,000 Per Month! 😎

Originally posted by: -Mr.CooL-

I'm The Real Superstar I Earn 15,000 Per Month! 😎

I earn 16,000. Would that make me a megastar? 😃

How does the star ladder work? ⭐️

Khans have been around for 25 years..how can you compare them with actors who have been around for 7/8 years?

The Khans have built their careers over a long period of time..they have so many films and roles under their belt.They have bank of so many hit songs and dances..

Many actresses these days are doing good work..and they have created opportunities for themselves to do roles which will survive the test of time..