Is Teesa being selfish or itz her love for Nimboli ?? - Page 6

Originally posted by: SPuja

I almost forgot about Anandi during that phase, even though someone posted a picture of Ganga afte divorce. Now it seems most probable that creatives think rural look is not complete without mang tika - so Anandi and Ganga persisted with this ornament. But Anandi knows this - plus the little girl with pallu on head (plus she is illiterate in this age - improbable for a girl if she is living with her parents unless they are too poor and the girl does not look poor at all) - so she should have immediately deduced that the little girl is married.

@ Bold Yesterday I was watching old BV episodes (before AnSh marriage) and girls from Anandi school were not wearing pallu on head including Gulli. Of course they didn't put on any mang tika.

Ashima wore Anandi's lehenga choli when she came to BH and Sanchi tried to impress KB & BH elders showing fake love for traditional costumes but they never put pallu or mang tika on head.

Found this in picture gallery.



I observed Bhago, Harki, Nimboli and few other women always wear the same borla. But people who belong to rich families use different styles of mang tika like Sumithra, Gehna, Anandi (as BH bahu), Ganga etc...and Suguna, Anandi (after her marriage with Shiv)...

Originally posted by: SPuja

@bold - I do understand this - thats why I said BV and its innocent characters. When their intention is clear - why not make it realistic? What prevented them to make nimboli remove the borla and pallu? After all Harki does not want her to be Kundan's wife anymore. But pointing out this resulted in so many arguments in favour of creatives so much so that unmarried girls wear mang tika and borla is for married girls. Why it is so difficult to accept that creatives go wrong in many things as pointed out in case of Bhairo, Sugna etc.? Why there is urge to defend these lapses? Directors do show many things which are totally unacceptable - like a nurse doing operation watching a video - do we have to accept all this because that is what directors want us to believe?

Originally posted by: The_Alchemist.

I think the problem arises when we start blaming characters in the serial instead of pointing out the directors For instance when one says --- How come Anandi didn't notice that thing? How come she isn't trying to help a BV? etc etc... When these kind of Q's are raised, it feels like as if anandi purposely wanted to leave that BV out...while in real she's made it her 24*7 job to help out all such victims. Or it's like saying -- Look at Jagya, he doesn't bother to meet his sister sugna or his parents? While in real he doesn't intend to avoid them or be mean to them. And lot more examples like this...

If we blame the CV's and say -- Look they didn't show the custom properly(in reality that's the only thing they know😆. They screw up more in professional tracks) . Or when we say - just see the way they made suguna and J's parents disappear, it means we are only pointing out them.

Some members say that in one case the CV's are wrong and in another similar case the character is blamed ...she is mean and bad and what not (And the replies you got in support of directors might be the replies for all q's related to this track and not just pointed to you) . You haven't been one such member , hence my effort to explain.

I dont bash any character - since Anandi is positive character - I also like Anandi. But for quite some time - perhaps after this leap, the forum has changed. I joined the forum because it provided a platform for wonderful discussions. Now it is reduced to fan war and anybody pointing out any lapse in the serial will be bashed/mocked/ explained that such things do happen(in short creatives will be defended because it is related to their favorite character) - it does not matter that the person pointing out the lapse in track is not bashing any character. This may be the reason we do not see many members who used to take part in discussions. I come to this forum sometimes and post very less - there is no use coming to forum for fighting.

What I wanted to say by pointing out this borla/mang tika and pallu thing is - Nimboli actually looks balika vadhu because so far no unmarried girl was shown with mang tika and pallu. I know to stretch the serial, it is necessary that Anandi should not know (as of now) that Nimboli is a balika vadhu. So, they should have removed this pallu and mang tika otherwise it looks like Anandi is actually foolish to not notice these things (I did not use this word earlier - but to clarify the point I used it here) . Since this is their main story - the protagonist is devoted to eradicate the evil of bal-vivah - she herself was a balika vadhu and she has been living in village for most part of her life - she should know the signs of being married and how the attire of girls changes after getting married. Removing pallu and mang tika was not such a big thing that could not have been incorporated.

Coming to blaming the character part - my personal opinion is - if we can praise the character for what he/she is being made to do by creatives - we can also ridicule the character. It is not that the character is to be praised for anything good he/she does but when he/she does anything bad/foolish - it is the fault of creatives.

Originally posted by: SPuja

I dont bash any character - since Anandi is positive character - I also like Anandi. But for quite some time - perhaps after this leap, the forum has changed. I joined the forum because it provided a platform for wonderful discussions. Now it is reduced to fan war and anybody pointing out any lapse in the serial will be bashed/mocked/ explained that such things do happen(in short creatives will be defended because it is related to their favorite character) - it does not matter that the person pointing out the lapse in track is not bashing any character. This may be the reason we do not see many members who used to take part in discussions. I come to this forum sometimes and post very less - there is no use coming to forum for fighting.

What I wanted to say by pointing out this borla/mang tika and pallu thing is - Nimboli actually looks balika vadhu because so far no unmarried girl was shown with mang tika and pallu. I know to stretch the serial, it is necessary that Anandi should not know (as of now) that Nimboli is a balika vadhu. So, they should have removed this pallu and mang tika otherwise it looks like Anandi is actually foolish to not notice these things (I did not use this word earlier - but to clarify the point I used it here) . Since this is their main story - the protagonist is devoted to eradicate the evil of bal-vivah - she herself was a balika vadhu and she has been living in village for most part of her life - she should know the signs of being married and how the attire of girls changes after getting married. Removing pallu and mang tika was not such a big thing that could not have been incorporated.

Coming to blaming the character part - my personal opinion is - if we can praise the character for what he/she is being made to do by creatives - we can also ridicule the character. It is not that the character is to be praised for anything good he/she does but when he/she does anything bad/foolish - it is the fault of creatives.

Harki took away Sindoor from Nimboli but everyone in that village know na that she is Kundan's wife? including Akheraj's relatives...don't know how this will hide kundan is married.

What is so difficult about hiding about Kundan's wedding to Nimboli? If he can terrorise the villagers to keep silent about Gopal's murder and silence the witnesses he can very well hide Kundan's marriage.

Originally posted by: Cool-n-Fresh

Harki took away Sindoor from Nimboli but everyone in that village know na that she is Kundan's wife? including Akheraj's relatives...don't know how this will hide kundan is married.

I don't think Harki wants to hide Kundan is married. She just doesn't want Nimboli to put sindoor in the name of Kundan. Harki must have given her borla & sindoor long back because she considered her Kundan's wife to get rid of some dosh. Now she felt the purpose is fulfilled hence took them back.

She didn't ask Nimboli to dress like an unmarried girl she just doesn't want to recognize this marriage anymore.

She took away Sindoor and Borla from Nandini to derecognise the marriage.Since she wanted to get Kundan married again.