Ishita is letting Subbu to get emotionally attached with her

It's not a Ishita bashing post as some of her "supporters" might think. Raman previously asked (through his letter that Ishita termed as love letter) Ishita to wait for him as he would accompany her to the doctor. Ishita could've waited for Raman easily. If you say she would miss the appointment, then there were Bhallas to accomapny her. Even we previously saw she alone had gone out with the driver. Why so suddenly Subbu had to accompany her? Similar thing happened during Mani track, when there were so many family members to help her, she opted to choose Mani's assistance. One might say it's for creating drama but it's also undelinable that it's making bad impression on her character.

You can say, can't a lady go out with a man? Such a regressive thinking. But does a person go out or seek company of his/her ex when there is no need for that "company" at all?

Ishita is following her own dialog "ungle denge toh haat pakdega". And, the precap is just a distraction, she'll again forget all her doubts. Just the way she forgot her initial doubt on Subbu. It's a common sense that if Ishita keeps leeting Subbu interferring into her life, he will again get attached to her as he lost his family now. You don't need to be a Sherlock Holmes to deduce that and if that happens, who'll be resonsible?

Who is responsible???

Originally posted by: appuss

Who is responsible???

Answer - Ishita, she is the reason for all problems in ishra life!!! Sad that Raman didnt go to Singapore. That would have solved everything.😕

See, no matter how you expalin, some ppl will think TM is bashing Ishita or Raman.

Its cvs who for their love for drama make illogical tracks.
Just as we saw Raman having dinner with Shagun forgetting about his handicapped wife in a restaurant, similarly we will un-necessarily see Ishita going with Subbu while she cud have gone with anyone from Iyers/ bala jeeju/ mihika or even driver or neelu.

But Cvs love drama so we have to watch such scenes.

If one of the characters dont act out of their character then how will they create drama.

I think there is no point in talking about compromised characterizations of leads it just grows into Raman vs Ishita wars n We dont get any Result out of it.

Originally posted by: --Megha--

Its cvs who for their love for drama make illogical tracks.
Just as we saw Raman having dinner with Shagun forgetting about his handicapped wife in a restaurant, similarly we will un-necessarily see Ishita going with Subbu while she cud have gone with anyone from Iyers/ bala jeeju/ mihika or even driver or neelu.

But Cvs love drama so we have to watch such scenes.

If one of the characters dont act out of their character then how will they create drama.

I think there is no point in talking about compromised characterizations of leads it just grows into Raman vs Ishita wars n We dont get any Result out of it.

Both the lead characters are being compromized, that I agree. But Raman having dinner with Shagun is a different case altogether coz Ruhi was there. She also requested her father to stay there. Raman had met or helped Shagun (other than the riot episode) only when their children were involved. Here, Ishita seeking Subbu's help doesn't make any sense, specially when her own family members were available.

Originally posted by: RaimaV

It's not a Ishita bashing post as some of her "supporters" might think. Raman previously asked (through his letter that Ishita termed as love letter) Ishita to wait for him as he would accompany her to the doctor. Ishita could've waited for Raman easily. If you say she would miss the appointment, then there were Bhallas to accomapny her. Even we previously saw she alone had gone out with the driver. Why so suddenly Subbu had to accompany her? Similar thing happened during Mani track, when there were so many family members to help her, she opted to choose Mani's assistance. One might say it's for creating drama but it's also undelinable that it's making bad impression on her character.

You can say, can't a lady go out with a man? Such a regressive thinking. But does a person go out or seek company of his/her ex when there is no need for that "company" at all?

Ishita is following her own dialog "ungle denge toh haat pakdega". And, the precap is just a distraction, she'll again forget all her doubts. Just the way she forgot her initial doubt on Subbu. It's a common sense that if Ishita keeps leeting Subbu interferring into her life, he will again get attached to her as he lost his family now. You don't need to be a Sherlock Holmes to deduce that and if that happens, who'll be resonsible?

its a very common thing with Balaji cv's to butcher the characters to create drama...else how can you explain, that the Ishita, who was hell bent against Subbu...suddenly is going with him, without doubting him...

Originally posted by: RaimaV

Both the lead characters are being compromized, that I agree. But Raman having dinner with Shagun is a different case altogether coz Ruhi was there. She also requested her father to stay there. Raman had met or helped Shagun (other than the riot episode) only when their children were involved. Here, Ishita seeking Subbu's help doesn't make any sense, specially when her own family members were available.

Whatever it is - whether Ishita asked him to go or Ruhi k liye dinner but leaving ur handicapped wife alone in hotel comes across as "insensitive".

That is the effect what CVS wanted to show then that Raman is insensitive.

Similarly now we see Ishita preferring to go with Subbu for check ups leaving behind her family, when in reality one's ex will b the last person one wud go for medical checkups with when we have other alternatives like requesting family members.

Originally posted by: sunitas123

Did u not see the episode? All had gone out except Rinki! Rinki did take the trouble to complain to Raman but she cud have accompanied Ishita instead. She was going for getting the plaster removed after which she may need some help to walk. She called Raman n number of times, he cud still have gone if he wished knowing Subbu had gone with her. But he chose to stay back.

Ishita never wanted anything to do with Subbu. So if Subbu gets attached to ishita it is Raman's fault. But we can be sure Ishita wont get attached to Subbu in which case it wud have been her fault😆

Well, she could've phoned her other family members and not to forget Iyers were there too. And, Ishita should ask Rinki's assistance, would have been far better than seeking Subbu's assistance, no? More imprtantly, we had seen Ishita going out alone nuber of times after her fracture, she just needed a driver for that.

Sorry to say, you tried to sound sarcastic in your last paragarph but ended up uttering something illogical. Raman a[obviously asked her to forgive Subbu but he never told to be friendly or to spend time with him. Ishita can easily understand that if she continues to spend time with Subbu he'll get attached to her considering his current situation. If she still continues to do so, isn't she inviting trouble on her own?

I want YHM CVs to visit this forum.