Firstly they did not even talk about from where the gun came. If it was planned by DD and Roshni to lure RV into the fort so that they could kill him then why did RV posses a gun.
Second there were other goons present in the fort. Where are they? Aren't they supposed to be present at the court?
Third how can a lawyer ask a person that couldnt they manipulate the person by talking for 2 minutes and wait for the police. That was ridiculous.
Fourth DD herself called the police when they were following the wrong vehicle.
Fifth RV himself had called up Kritika there to meet him so how in the world did Roshni n DD lure him there?
Anyway my point is the lawyer himself was confused and I don't understand when there are so many proofs that Roshni AnD DD did not pre plan how can the defense lawyer say in the end that they will lose most likely. It was a tough case, one against 2 witnesses. ( SidNi )
Just to make Siddharth prove DD innocent they just did not go into the details.
Plus the prosecution lawyer's acting was horrible and not at all convincing. Sorry his acting and questions made it uninteresting .