..::Doubts & Discussions about Historical facts::.. - Page 78

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

257.3k

Users

170

Likes

4.2k

Frequent Posters

history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago


Posted a Farman of Mariam-Uz-Zamani Begum


Hi Friends,


This post is about an edict(Imperial Order/Farman) issued by Mariam-Uz-Zamani(MUZ) Begum. It happens to be one of the most awaited posts, for which many of you have sent enough messages.. Sorry for the delay, but this post is worth it's wait.


Sharing the details of a hukm or edict issued by this remarkable lady with you. It was fascinating to see how involved she was in such a routine court matter as the embezzlement of the assets of a court employee by a Zamindar. This is an example of how she was involved in resolving the civil disputes among the masses through her edicts.


Before we start, let me tell the brief contents of this post. The Imperial Order/Farman of MUZ is discussed at the end of the post, and before that, various terminologies related to Imperial Mughal Farmans have been discussed. This post contains the Original Persian Scan of that Farman, along with some scans from the Indian Historical Records Commission Meeting, 1925 at Lahore ; which describes the title of "Wali Nimat" conferred on Mariam-Uz-Zamani Begum.

Wali Nimat means "Gift of God/Blessing of Saint".

I am ONLY sharing the LINK of that Post by Radhika, here.

Click HERE to READ


Edited by history_geek - 10 years ago
history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago

Hi all,


As most of you know, Akbar once rode nonstop on a horse to stop a princess from being forced to commit the Sati practice...

Was discussing this incident on the forum, few days back.
Thought of writing about that event also.

Regarding the same incident , made a post. Have given the details of this lady also, whom Akbar saved and gave a new lease of life.

Link:


Wish we can see this and other such pro-active steps undertaken by Akbar for the welfare of his people in our show. It would have been a rare Emperor who would have thought of his people so much..

RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago

Hi

Sharing something here regarding Akbar's religious policies. Pls correct me if you think the following extract from my reading is wrong.

*******************************



"The historian Vincent Smith, in his biographical study of Akbar, declares that the emperor, after he had returned from his successful expedition against the rebels, called a formal council to promulgate his new religion the Din-i-Ilahi...The Jesuits apparently had not heard of any such proclamation. In fact, Father Monserrate, who accompanied Akbar to Kabul and back, thought that the emperor had grown more cautious in the expression of his views...These conflicting judgments {on Akbar's religious proclivity}partly reflect the inevitable differences that result from assessing a complex personality, but they are due also to conflicting contemporary accounts and, in no small degree, to erroneous translations of the relevant Persian texts.

The foundation for the misunderstanding of Akbar's religious history was laid by Blochmann in the introduction to his translation of Abul Fazl'sAin-i-Akbari; ...The crucial question about Akbar's religious activity is whether he established a new religion or a new spiritual order. ...The expressions used by both Abul Fazl and Badauni in this connection, however, areiradatormuridi(discipleship) but Blochmann habitually translates these expressions as "divine faith," thus converting a religious order (or even a bond of loyalty) into anew religion. He translated the expressionain-i-iradat gazinan, which correctly means "rules for the (royal) disciples," as the "principles of divine faith," and gives the subsection the heading, "ordinances of the divine faith," although there is no such heading in the original text.

...Akbar's regulations which were not of an ephemeral or tentative character have been preserved in...Ain-i-Akbari, and it would be illogical to suppose that important royal orders, which were to be given general currency in the empire, would have been omitted...there is no reason to suppose that regulations for the Din-i-Ilahi would not have been included. ...theAinappears to be the most dependable source of information regarding Akbar's religious regulations and spiritual practices.

According toAin-i-Akbarithe emperor discouraged people from becoming his disciples...


Edited by RadhikaS0 - 10 years ago
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
How the Mughal Army Fought Wars


It seems that the Mughal army was not one unit but many units brought loosely together. Each unit reported to it s mansabdar / commander only. And at most, to the emperor or some high official. If the commander of a unit fell, that unit simply left the battleground. 😆 This was because their loyalty was bound to their pay which was given by the unit commander.

The commanders were not full-time military officers. At times, even poets and physicians could be asked to command in a war. The army had no command structure. Assignments were ad hoc. An amir in one campaign could be a subordinate in a different or even in the same campaign. SO they were constantly thwarting each other and vying for top spot.

Even the dress and fighting style / weapons varied from unit to unit. It was hard to say in the war who belonged to which side. What confusion this must have caused. 😲

Generally, the front soldiers fought while those at the back just waved their swords or whatever and shouted slogans and did little else. This was because there would be just one officer for around 5000 soldiers. So the soldiers were barely under control during a war.

Only the artillery was a specialized unit under a Mir Atish. The cavalry, infantry and elephant divisions were distributed among high-ranking mansabdars. Only the central army was under the emperor. Then came the forces maintained by mansabdars and rajas. Finally the local militia brought in times of need by zamindars and others for temporary service.

Corruption and laziness marked the Mughal army. Mansabdars had to maintain a cavalry of soldiers and horses as per rank. But they would take the upkeep money and when required to show their horsemen, would produce stray horses and local men. This was one of the reasons why Akbar promulgated branding of royal horses and maintaining a register of soldiers with their personal details. 😊

Europeans found it easy to defeat Mughal armies even when outnumbered esp in the latter years of the empire because the army size kept getting fatter while its fighting spirit kept going down.

When Babur won at Panipat against a huge Afghan army with a small force that he could command directly. But Humayun lost at Kannauj with a much larger army against a smaller Afghan force. Humayun won back his empire with a small army. This proves that discipline, energy and spirit are more important to win a war than the size of the army.
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
How the Mughal Army Fought Wars - Contd.

The core of the Mughal army was the central cavalry under the direct control of the Emperor. This was a small, select force. Under Akbar, its strength was less than 25,000. Each soldier and officer was selected with care and had to have good behavior. The horsemen also had to maintain at least one Turkish horse each.

It had an inner core of its own, made up of gentlemen troopers called Ahadis, who were kept in a high state of military preparedness at all times. (Where are these in the show?)

Aurangzeb always had 2000 to 3000 horsemen, presumably Ahadis, at hand for emergencies. But as the Mughal empire declined, the term Ahadi became synonymous with an idler.

The Mir Bakshi checked the men, the horses and the equipment periodically. If a horse died, the horseman had to show proof the same day and buy a new horse within a week.

When the emperor sent a general on a campaign, the latter had to parade his unit in front of the palace windows. 3 days after the check up, he could proceed on the campaign. The time was given to make up any shortages in equipment etc.

As mentioned earlier, the mansabdars tried to cheat the emperor by not maintaining the required number of soldiers/horses, forget about the quality. They would sometimes dress up their own servants as soldiers for checks or even borrow men / horses from each other.!

No wonder Akbar had to start branding of horses. During Aurangzeb's time, the horses in the emperor's service were branded on the right flank and those under mansabdars were branded on the left flank, usually with the first letter of the owner's name.

The inspection of the force of a mansabdar was slackened later and Aurangzeb exempted mansabdars of 3000 and higher rank from having to show their force for inspection during his Deccan campaign.

The local militia was called bhumi and usually had infantry. But it could have some cavalry, and even guns and boats. The cavalry maintained by zamindars was more regular and was usually used to maintain law and order in rural Hindustan.

Edited by RadhikaS0 - 10 years ago
-aady- thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Radhika, you mentioned about having some hard copies of certain Historicals. I would like to order a few, so what would you suggest? :)
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
How the Mughal Army Fought Wars - Contd.
The cavalry was the elite wing of the army. About 1 lakh horses were imported into India from the Balk, Bukhara and Kabul every year. And the emperor made a neat profit on their import. 😆

In late 16th century, a horse could cost about Rs 1000 while a slave girl cost only Rs 40-60.

Cavalrymen were usually heavily armed. "at their sides good swords; under them sheves of arrowes; on their shoulders bucklers, and upon their backs guns fastened with belts; at the left side bowes hanging in cases, and lances about 2 yards and a halfe long (having excellent steele heads), which they carry in their hands."

A Mughal cavalry charge must have been an awesome sight and it would have been something to watch a cavalier gallop into action mounted on a imported horse.

The horses of Amirs had embroidered saddles adorned with precious stones, and tassels of yak tails on the front and back of their saddles as well as the heads of their horses. When the cavalier would be riding at full speed or when a good wind would be blowing, these tassels would fly in the wind and it would look like the horse had wings - a delightful sight indeed to behold!

The infantry had the lowest status and lowest pay. It was huge in size but had porters, postal runners, gladiators, wrestlers, palanquin-bearers, water carriers etc on its rolls. It was ill-equipped, ill-disciplined and more a liability than an asset in war.

Gunners were part of infantry. They ahd no rank and were known as tufangis. This was a pity because Indian, esp Mughal guns, were better than European guns in quality. Firearms came to India from the middle east. They were used in Kashmir, Gujarat and Kerala for the first tie in late 15th century. Babur was the first to use cannons and muskets effectively on a battlefield for the first time in India.

Common weapons were the sword, the bow and arrow and the spear. The Rajputs usually used a short spear with shield, dagger and sword.

Shields were made of leather and had inch-long nails protruidng from them.

Soldiers wore a coat of mail. But the emperor preferred the jubba, a coat made of thick quilted silk or cotton that could bend the point of a sword!

Size

Akbar led the largest army unit in his Deccan campaign - about 80,000 horsemen. But after him, the size kept increasing. Aurangzeb led a cavalry of 170,000 in his Deccan campaign.

Pay

The Ahadis, the personal guards of the emperor, were paid around Rs 500 per month! Ordinary royal mounted soldiers got Rs 7 to 8, apart from money for maintenance of their horses and equipment. This could go up to Rs 13-15 if the soldier had an imported horse. This salary was same as that of a physician!

Artillerymen were paid Rs 7 to Rs 13.

Mansabdars paid their men as they pleased.

Passwords

Yes, there were passwords back then too! 😊 One for the tribe and one for the whole army. Since the armies had no uniforms or dress code, passwords were used to identify friend from foe on the battlefield.

Technology

Military technology was changing. Infantry with its guns, cannons and muskets was replacing the cavalry in importance. New military discipline, new formations and tactics were needed but the Mughals were slow to adapt.

Conventional Mughal campaigns under Akbar would consist of cavalry charges as soon as the enemy came into sight. (Though Humayun and Sher Shah Suri would face each other at close quarters for weeks without engaging in battle. 😲)

Capturing Forts

This was a slow, tedious process during Mughal times. Cannons were not good enough to breach the walls of the fort. Mining was foiled by counter mining.

Storming a fort was extremely risky as the defenders in the fort would attack them with bricks, stones, arrows and bullets and even pour boiling pitch on them. Defenders would even fire cannons, throw lighted bombs, blazing sheets steeped in naptha, bundles of burning grass. Very primitive and barbaric but effective in those times!



How I wish we could see some of this war strategy and tactics in the show, but alas!

PutijaChalhov thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago
Thanks Radhika for the information.


Updated: March 23, 2015 08:13 IST

Humayun's Tomb gets new finial

PTI

The Hindu
The new finial above the dome of Humayun's Tomb. The decorative structure was damaged by a storm last year. Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

The gold leaves on the final are just plating, but the idea is to get it done in gold eventually.

The Humayun's Tomb in the national capital has got its finial back, after a storm dislodged it last May.

"The new finial was installed last week," Atul Kumar Bharagawa, Superintendent Archaeologist, Delhi Circle, Archaeological Survey of India, said.

Almost a replica of the previous one, the new finial is made of copper of 99.5 per cent purity.

Traditionally crafted

Traditional craftsmen worked on it to match the perfection of the original piece. On May 30, the ornamental and "auspicious" finial installed atop the dome of the 16th century tomb, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, was damaged in a thunderstorm. The 18-foot-long finial had 11 copper vessels in gold finish and covered with a brass crown. It had a beam made of sal wood inside.

After an initial study carried out by a team of the ASI and the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, the trust was asked to prepare a report in June. After it submitted the report on July 16, the ASI sent samples from the broken finial to the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. The trust was given permission on December 31 to carry out the repairs.

The finial is 24 foot long, with a little of it going inside the dome.

"After months of hard work, we have finally brought the finial back on top of the dome. To carry out the installation, we had to put up a 140-foot-high scaffolding," Ratish Nanda, project director of the trust, said.

He said the gold leaves on the final were just plating, but the idea was to get it done in gold eventually.

"We are looking for a corporate sponsorship to get the leaves done completely in gold. Once we get it, we will redo the finial with all gold work," Mr. Nanda said.

ASI archives say the finial was last dismantled and repaired by the British in 1912, who documented the object. It helped the team in its reconstruction.

"The 11 copper vessels in gold finish were in a friable state and had been repaired several times over the past five centuries. Each vessel was weighed and studied separately to allow comparisons with the original profile and carefully map the damage," Mr. Nanda said.

He said the wood of the beam had been damaged by water retention following repairs a few decades ago using cement, blocking the water outlet. In keeping with the conservation philosophy, traditional craftsmen were engaged to prepare the vessels just as they were prepared five centuries ago.

"We got some of these craftsmen in Chawri Bazar here, but it was not easy, putting this together. But, we did not want to compromise on the heritage value of the finial. I am glad the crown is finally back on the king's head," a senior ASI official said.

Old one to be preserved

"The old finial will be kept in the new, onsite museum coming up at the tomb. It will be its centrepiece," Mr. Nanda said.


harshu27 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: PutijaChalhov

Thanks Radhika for the information.


Updated: March 23, 2015 08:13 IST

<h1>Humayun's Tomb gets new finial</h1>
PTI









The Hindu
The new finial above the dome of
Humayun's Tomb. The decorative structure was damaged by a storm last year.
Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma







<h2>The gold leaves on the final are just plating, but the idea is to get it
done in gold eventually.</h2>

The Humayun's Tomb in the national capital has got its finial
back, after a storm dislodged it last May.


"The new finial was installed last week," Atul Kumar Bharagawa,
Superintendent Archaeologist, Delhi Circle, Archaeological Survey of India,
said.


Almost a replica of the previous one, the new finial is made of
copper of 99.5 per cent purity.


Traditionally crafted


Traditional craftsmen worked on it to match the perfection of the
original piece. On May 30, the ornamental and "auspicious" finial installed atop
the dome of the 16th century tomb, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, was damaged in
a thunderstorm. The 18-foot-long finial had 11 copper vessels in gold finish and
covered with a brass crown. It had a beam made of sal wood inside.


After an initial study carried out by a team of the ASI and the
Aga Khan Trust for Culture, the trust was asked to prepare a report in June.
After it submitted the report on July 16, the ASI sent samples from the broken
finial to the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. The trust was given
permission on December 31 to carry out the repairs.


The finial is 24 foot long, with a little of it going inside the
dome.


"After months of hard work, we have finally brought the finial
back on top of the dome. To carry out the installation, we had to put up a
140-foot-high scaffolding," Ratish Nanda, project director of the trust, said.


He said the gold leaves on the final were just plating, but the
idea was to get it done in gold eventually.


"We are looking for a corporate sponsorship to get the leaves done
completely in gold. Once we get it, we will redo the finial with all gold work,"
Mr. Nanda said.


ASI archives say the finial was last dismantled and repaired by
the British in 1912, who documented the object. It helped the team in its
reconstruction.


"The 11 copper vessels in gold finish were in a friable state and
had been repaired several times over the past five centuries. Each vessel was
weighed and studied separately to allow comparisons with the original profile
and carefully map the damage," Mr. Nanda said.


He said the wood of the beam had been damaged by water retention
following repairs a few decades ago using cement, blocking the water outlet. In
keeping with the conservation philosophy, traditional craftsmen were engaged to
prepare the vessels just as they were prepared five centuries ago.


"We got some of these craftsmen in Chawri Bazar here, but it was
not easy, putting this together. But, we did not want to compromise on the
heritage value of the finial. I am glad the crown is finally back on the king's
head," a senior ASI official said.


Old one to be preserved


"The old finial will be kept in the new, onsite museum coming up
at the tomb. It will be its centrepiece," Mr. Nanda said.




thnx fr sharing d info
history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago


Hi all..

Sharing a link of a post here.

It is a Nishan (more or less, it is like a farman in simple terms) issued by Sahibat uz Zamani Padshah Begum Saheb Jahanara under her Seal.

Click Here to READ

A stellar personality whose stature has been eclipsed under the giant names of Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb. This post also contains link of 2 other posts made on her. She played instrumental role in the life of these 2 people, mentioned above.

At the end of this post, a brief comparison has been given of the situations when the Mughal ladies issued such strict orders. I found it interesting.


Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".