Originally posted by: viveka698
Oh well, what's the point in even getting trained in firearms...!
Our fighting instincts have clearly been eroded by years of civilization. But specifically, what has truncated women from their baser selves - is it patriarchy and generations of conditioning? - the kind of pacification that would like us to believe that women are innately all-beatific, nurturing, do-no-harmers - that men are protectors and women are protectees?
Women today, in general, are barely aware of their physical powers; barely get to shed their civilized skins while men are more likely to use their physicality. And just self-defense training isn't enough to stop a woman from being afraid during an assault, no? (thinking out loud here) In addition to training, it does takes lots of mental preparation, the "choice" to fight, and ceaseless anticipation of danger to help channelize such unhealthy fear and react.
@Meera30: Survival of the fittest alone isn't enough, no? For the human race to carry on, females are also (more) necessary. So, it's more like - survival and reproduction of the fittest. From this perspective, I think whichever soldier it was that died protecting her did good to "prolong the process of the end", as you so eloquently said.
Most importantly, for human race to survive in such dire circumstances, shouldn't the balance of power (responsibility) between the sexes be reestablished?
P.S.: Dude, you made me fall in love on a damp Monday morning. You write about human psyche so darn well. It's a great day to live! :=)
3