Something to think about - Page 24

Nice concept and a nice story but I am unable to process it because in the segments she dies in his arms...I don't think that can be reversed. This is unbelievably cruel...the whole point of the lovestory has just dissolved. I am utterly appalled by the cvs. They have taken us for a ride.

My first post on RR and a first LONG one at that. For all the frenzy happening around with the array of BTS, articles, etc, what surprises me most are the following
1. Eternal silence of makers on networking sites who are otherwise active
2. For such a major change of story if a lead is being written off, there is not a single promo.
3. The choice of words to discuss the track.
-- BTS segments call it 'fanaa' instead of a simple word 'mauth'.
--The TB video talks about Rudra 'assuming' Sh killed Paro and Sh "wanting" to kill.
-- Rudra offscreen uses the word "haadsa" instead of saying Paro ko maar diya but Shantanu
says "maar diya" cos that's what is his POV.
-- AS and SI in the joint IV discuss about dusri shaadi karva do, move on in life, biwi mar gayi toh
shok me jaounga, pagal mat ban jaa, kuch bhi ho sakta hai. That was too much of a give away of
the real plot IF ever it were.

All the offshoots and articles are not reaching the audience who contribute to TRP as there is not even a promo that can stir their curiosity. The frenzy is only among online viewers where they already have a huge following.

What is the guarantee the "killing off" would gain the numbers. With considerations of change in time slot, they might as well have continued another 50 episodes with existing storyline. If its slated to end before BB airs, why kill the main lead for just 50 more episodes.

Something is amiss.

Originally posted by: Abhi4u

My first post on RR and a first LONG one at that. For all the frenzy happening around with the array of BTS, articles, etc, what surprises me most are the following
1. Eternal silence of makers on networking sites who are otherwise active
2. For such a major change of story if a lead is being written off, there is not a single promo.
3. The choice of words to discuss the track.
-- BTS segments call it 'fanaa' instead of a simple word 'mauth'.
--The TB video talks about Rudra 'assuming' Sh killed Paro and Sh "wanting" to kill.
-- Rudra offscreen uses the word "haadsa" instead of saying Paro ko maar diya but Shantanu
says "maar diya" cos that's what is his POV.
-- AS and SI in the joint IV discuss about dusri shaadi karva do, move on in life, biwi mar gayi toh
shok me jaounga, pagal mat ban jaa, kuch bhi ho sakta hai. That was too much of a give away of
the real plot IF ever it were.

All the offshoots and articles are not reaching the audience who contribute to TRP as there is not even a promo that can stir their curiosity. The frenzy is only among online viewers where they already have a huge following.

What is the guarantee the "killing off" would gain the numbers. With considerations of change in time slot, they might as well have continued another 50 episodes with existing storyline. If its slated to end before BB airs, why kill the main lead for just 50 more episodes.


Something is amiss.

Originally posted by: babyji

Bang on post...something is definatly amiss unless they are banking on the fact that the trp junta watches SBS ,Sbb so they don't need to promote the track , those segments are enough to creat a stir among the trp Janta...

Originally posted by: ddFan2012

Exactly...something is amiss big time...

I was watching the Friday repeat, and they could have easily got Paro killed with the first bullet and ended her track there itself.. why the birth of the child...

So there is so much more to what is being shown in SBS segments who are right now busy gaining TRPs

Secondly again why would makers add a child artiste to their team...just for 50 epis...no...this little boy is key to the future PaRud track...

If it was Rudra just falling for someone who looks like his wife...there wasn't any need to have a child around...Its an added responsibility and investment.

P.S. also articles said she "feigns familiarity"