nature or nurture that depends on the parent

this is the worst show ive seen, non of the characters have consistancy,

All I know is that Evil is Evil. Pakhi is Evil and deserves the slap rightfully. Her parents are murderers and she will also turn into one very soon because of her IMMATURE nature.

Kamla has not abandoned Paakhi...but the other way round. Paakhi had always used Kamla knowingly and unknowingly ...Kamla has always given her all to Paakhi and always tried to keep her on the right track. She had always taught Paakhi the right thing to do. She had advised Paakhi to win Raghav with love not conspire against him and win him by deception. That was all Paakhi's doing. In this as you rightly said, nature won against nurture. Though Kamla tried to nurture her with love and right morals , Paakhi's manipulative, egoistic and deceptive nature won the struggle and she showed her true colors and the fact that the Kapoor blood does flow in her veins afterall. So Paakhi has proved that nature cannot be altered , only modified according to circumstances. Paakhi was sweet when it suited her and when it came to her survival she returned to her roots.

There's a saying, "children are a product of their environment", I don't mean like an area, I mean the household, the manner in which they were raised and the parents they have. Analyze Pookie, Kalpi and Raghav's environment and then you would get a better understand of how each one turned out to be the way they are.

Originally posted by: daisyfields

Kamla has not abandoned Paakhi...but the other way round. Paakhi had always used Kamla knowingly and unknowingly ...Kamla has always given her all to Paakhi and always tried to keep her on the right track. She had always taught Paakhi the right thing to do. She had advised Paakhi to win Raghav with love not conspire against him and win him by deception. That was all Paakhi's doing. In this as you rightly said, nature won against nurture. Though Kamla tried to nurture her with love and right morals , Paakhi's manipulative, egoistic and deceptive nature won the struggle and she showed her true colors and the fact that the Kapoor blood does flow in her veins afterall. So Paakhi has proved that nature cannot be altered , only modified according to circumstances. Paakhi was sweet when it suited her and when it came to her survival she returned to her roots.

Kalpi has never loved Ragzs for his money , she always loved him for himself. She also believed in achieving her dreams on her own and has time and again refused Ragzs's help in doing so. She always knew her mother favoured Paakhi and even so loved her so never stood up to Kamla . She also knew that all said and done Raghav was in the wrong and she is aware of her parent's pain adn humiliation that they suffered due to her broken marriage, so she's keeping peace by not standing up to them. At the same time she's also firm in her resolve to love Ragzs so she is standing up to Pakahi and Kamla for her sindoor marriage. Kalpi has proved that not only is her nature truly gentle and good but her nurturing by her parents is good too.

Raghav has never had any nurturing in the first place having been left alone to fend for himself in this world. So he's always been selfish and looking after his needs for survival . He got his first taste of love with Kalpi and gave his all to fight for it and keep it. He was almost successful but suddenly he was given that one love for which he had been desperate for all his life- his mother and so he went for it like a starving child landing in a candy store with a free pass. He was willing to do anything to please his mother and keep her with him forever. He also knows that Kalpi will always love him and its just a matter of time after which they will be together...

So all in all I guess each character is true to their nature...

Originally posted by: aanchal57

Well said dear and don't explain 2 deaf ears dey won't understanding understanding... Khi fans r obsessed

Originally posted by: swetha_ch01

@daisyfields well explained. but I don't agree with you totally. CVS have butchered most of the characters to an extent. In general, any show modifies the storyline to suit the characters, but in EMA they have experimented with characters to according to story line. Kalpi and Raghav were introduced as strong characters of EMA but after Ra-khi they made them dumb in most of the scenes.

@aanchal57 merrydock is not Ra-khi fan, she commented in many Ragna posts. Its her general opinion about pakhi, and the way the cvs are taking this poo track.