Richa being criticised by Judges - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

32

Views

2.1k

Users

24

Frequent Posters

madhy thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago
#31
i dont care if she wins da title..
Edited by madhy - 18 years ago
shizajaved thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: kshreya2002

thats rite seema. even when we were watching the auditions richa stood out thanks to her sweet, innocent face and good quality singing. but her childish voice also stood out. if lay ppl like us could make out that she has a childish voice why couldnt the judges.

public voting in every country is ruled by emotions rather than actual merit. so its the judge's duty to ensure that the best talent reaches the top 28 when the public voting opens so that whoever the viewers vote for is talented.

when judges arent doing that for whatever reason (channel pressure? who wants plain contestants who can sing well? they dont look good on the cover!) they can cant expect good judgement from the public. richa is simply doing her best but no one can change their voice overnight!

Replying to both of you in this single post! I respect what you both are saying. In the first place, Richa's voice is very attractive. That's why she got selected by the Judges. She was there till the piano rounds because she deserved to be there!! The song "Pal Pal" was extremely awesome when she sang it!! She's not a bad singer but I said "She did not deserve to enter the GALAS". At this stage, we have got many other wonderful singers as well! It's her luck and voice that made her reach the Piano rounds- True and obvious but.. Ankita was surely a BETTER singer and she got voted out instead of Richa (Who should have actualy got voted out!)

It's not judges fault! We were looking for a good talent and we got Richa. She's not a bad singer but sounds childish. If there would have been other judges (Sonu Nigham or whoever).. they would also have chosen Richa (in auditions).. Because her voice sounds attractive at the first place! But it's actually Janta's fault who is saved her to the Galas!!

Now, competition is TOUGH. There are many great singers. So, compared to them, she should not have got the chance to enter the Galas.

Judges are NOT criticizing her but just letting the public know that she sounds childish and can become a good singer after 2 years. They said this in a polite manner and I don't feel it's wrong. It is their opinion. And they are saying this to aware the public to vote for the right ones who deserve to enter more rounds!😊

TheRager thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 18 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: shizajaved

Judges are NOT criticizing her but just letting the public know that she sounds childish and can become a good singer after 2 years. They said this in a polite manner and I don't feel it's wrong. It is their opinion. And they are saying this to aware the public to vote for the right ones who deserve to enter more rounds!😊

true! but ensure na that good ones get into top 28. why wait to see how a contestant performs in the piano rounds and then start feeling he/she shouldnt have made it?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".