a clarification

in one thread my comment on abhimanyu got most glorious death is taken wrongly as i tried to justify all those who killed him saying them great , see i know people can have own interpretation regarding one statement and i have no right to stop them having that. but this is the case of Abhimanyu and i am always very much sensitive about him. So its a most cruel accusation to me that i tried to justify his murder hence i had to clarify this. because Abhimanyu's murder is a thing that i still can't accept and i still cry for him.
what i said that Abhimanyu got most glorious death in Kurukshetra because he fought till his end with seven valiant experienced maharathis double-tripple of his age
in battlefield every warrior dreams of dying while fighting till last breath, killing enemies , bathing in blood , this is called veergati what exactly Abhimanyu got and yes a valiant warrior of that stature only deserve a veergati and Abhimanyu got it so i said it was most suitable death of that brave-heart , that doesn't mean i wanted him to die in that young age or i justified his death no never in my worst nightmare but yes i will still say it was most suitable death for him wheather he would get in young age or mature age
regarding Karna broke his bow in fair fight that statement too was not to justify karna's participation in abhimanyu's murder even in my comment i wrote karna did wrong
what i said was karna didn't attack abhimanyu from behind, he broke his bow on a front fight and that too obeying drona's order
but i will never accept the cruel accusation that i considered abhimany's murderer great and i will fight till my end exactly as abhimanyu to justify myself in this case
Abhimanyu got glorious death because of his murderers? if my comment looked like that i agree to apologize for that to that much time until mods asks to stop me
but i clearly said karna was wrong in joining warriors to jump on the boy but i will still say abhimanyu wouln't have gotten this much glorious death
imagine a boy is alone fighting and killing enemies till last breath and those maharathis like drona, kripa, aswathama, duryodhan. duhshasan and ofcourse great warrior as karna are not able to defeat him alone, abhimanyu compelled all of them to attack him together what can bring more glory to him?
i think my comment got interpreted in opposite way but i request not to read too much between lines

this was my comment

and during killing of Abhimanyu that was most glorified death abhimanyu could ever get , yes Karna broke his bow but that was in a fair war , that was a cruel death but a suitable death for a braveheart as abhimanyu
Karna was not only one who killed abhimanyu from back if Karna was not involved then too Abhimanyu could have been killed
and Abhimanyu also killed Lakshmana, son of Duryodhan , both of them was like sons to Karna , what could Karna do he couldn't throw his bow it would be insult to warrior's duty which is foremost in battlefield

but still Karna was wrong being involved to kill his nephew when all the warriors jumped on the boy

in this comment did i ever say abhimanyu got glorious death because of his great murderers? no i only said karna didn't attack him from back and breaking bow from front was fair fight, but i didn't say karna with others attacking abhimanyu was fair no i clearly said its wrong, but karna did what drona asked him to do here he followed his commander to break abhimanyu's bow so here he was not attacking from back, so i can't call that unfair if one breaks opponents bow from front

and even if i accept that Karna attacked abhimanyu from back but he followed drona's order , drona suggested that and warrior's duy is to obey commander's word so how i can say karna was unfair there, how can he oppose his commander? yes all were wrong but here karna can't b singled out

so i conclude my statement with this that i consider everyone wrong for Abhimanyu's death , i know i am considered hater of draupadi , hater of arjun (which is another wrong accusation but i am not going to answer that) , hater of krishna and so on , i am not going to justify myself in these cases as my opinion is to me and people have right to consider what they want but Abhimanyu is my most sensitive spot hence i am not ready to accept the wrong accusation

sorry if i hurt anyone, mods can close the topic if they find it offensive but i didn't mean to offend anyone this clarification was just needed from me.