Posted:
I'm making this post as I was taken aback by shilpa shirodkar s tweet about wanting us to focus on the "positivity " of the show
Ironically the two other people I can recollect focussing on the "positivity" of the show have been pakhi ( don't know her real name) and pawandeep
That basically makes it the three negative characters ( 2 cast 1 crew) who insist on this positivity
Shall we attempt ?
1 Kamla saves pakhi over kalpi
If she didn't save pakhi she would probably lose her job , how would she educate kalpi if she didn't have a job , so it's justified ( cv s forgot that kalpi would be dead by then)
2 Kamla gives kalpi s pen to pakhi
She taught her daughter to always share , but she has no rights over pakhi cause she's not the biological mother ( cv s forgot that this applies only when the situation appeases to Kamla and pakhi)
3 Kamla sends kalpi away
To make her strong independent and determined
She didn't want to be in her daughters face so she doesn't bother to see her daughter for years
( cv s forgot that she's even educated , Kamla has kept her cutting vegetables the past 5 episodes)
4 Kamla doesn't trust kalpi
It's normal for any mother to worry about their daughter so it totally justifies her saying she is having "lafdaa" but since pakhi in this situation is not her daughter it is ok for her to have a "lafdaa"
5 Kamla loves pakhi and kalpi the same
Yet she chooses ones happiness over the other
Worst of all she choses daughters over the son ( positive thoughts remember actually this is a progressive thought)
Pakya has probably had it worse than kalpi
6 I cannot talk about pakhi
I've tried very hard and I'm tired spending so much time thinking about how any of their actions can even be remotely considered positive by a normal human
I cannot see anything positive with these two characters yet they claim that either they are positive ( pakhi) or the show is positive ( Kamla)
The less said about pawandeep the better
They badly need to change their pr strategy , it's laughable !
Ironically the two other people I can recollect focussing on the "positivity" of the show have been pakhi ( don't know her real name) and pawandeep
That basically makes it the three negative characters ( 2 cast 1 crew) who insist on this positivity
Shall we attempt ?
1 Kamla saves pakhi over kalpi
If she didn't save pakhi she would probably lose her job , how would she educate kalpi if she didn't have a job , so it's justified ( cv s forgot that kalpi would be dead by then)
2 Kamla gives kalpi s pen to pakhi
She taught her daughter to always share , but she has no rights over pakhi cause she's not the biological mother ( cv s forgot that this applies only when the situation appeases to Kamla and pakhi)
3 Kamla sends kalpi away
To make her strong independent and determined
She didn't want to be in her daughters face so she doesn't bother to see her daughter for years
( cv s forgot that she's even educated , Kamla has kept her cutting vegetables the past 5 episodes)
4 Kamla doesn't trust kalpi
It's normal for any mother to worry about their daughter so it totally justifies her saying she is having "lafdaa" but since pakhi in this situation is not her daughter it is ok for her to have a "lafdaa"
5 Kamla loves pakhi and kalpi the same
Yet she chooses ones happiness over the other
Worst of all she choses daughters over the son ( positive thoughts remember actually this is a progressive thought)
Pakya has probably had it worse than kalpi
6 I cannot talk about pakhi
I've tried very hard and I'm tired spending so much time thinking about how any of their actions can even be remotely considered positive by a normal human
I cannot see anything positive with these two characters yet they claim that either they are positive ( pakhi) or the show is positive ( Kamla)
The less said about pawandeep the better
They badly need to change their pr strategy , it's laughable !
Hindi TV Shows
