Confusion about Hindu Mythology - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

2k

Users

12

Likes

37

Frequent Posters

FairyLiquidSoap thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#11
SonyašŸ¤— Ahlan
I dont have sufficient free time right now but will try to address this in a day Very interesting question i must say ā­ļø
himba thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#12
You have raised an interesting topic. It is something that can spark off a lot of debate.

As you may already know, Greek Mythology was actually believed by the ancient Greeks. The Gods were worshiped in Temples.

If you now asked about the archaeological evidence of Rama, Krishna, Shiva -Parvati there maynot be any.

But Meera bai who wrote the Meera bhajan is a true devotee of Lord Krishna.

Now the main word here is belief ---if you are a believer it is true for you.
phulwa thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
Hinduism is the most ancient religions on earth and no one has been able to establish the period when it came into existance. Based on various studies and research, the proof of
existance of hinduism was estimated to be 5000 BC, i.e 5000 yrs before Christ was born. But, as per the Hindu texts it exists since the time universe came into existance. The belief that hinduism means worship of multiple gods/deities is not correct, according to hinduism god is the supreme force that does not have a form. Hindu scriptures define god as the creator, nurturer and destroyer and is respresented as the holy trinity Brahma(creator), Vishnu (nurturer)and Shiv(destroyer). So this trinity eventhough described as 3 gods is one entity and all the number of gods worshipped by hindus are different forms of the god and not different gods as such.
God represented as lord Vishnu the nurturer was born on earth 9 timee in different avatars, the most popular and recent being lord Ram and Krishna, there is physical evidence relating to both these avatars and hence it is established that they were truly born on this earth.
The usage of word mythology in context of hinduism is not appropriate and should not be used. The west coined this term as it was difficult for them to understand hinduism and also as
they could not find any physical evidence related to the instances mentioned in Hindi texts. Hinduism had at one point infinite literature and scriptures detailing everything related to the universe, unfortunately most of it has been destroyed over thousands of years and what we are left with right now is hardly 5% of it.
Edited by phulwa - 11 years ago
Zeffy thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#14
Hey,
This a really interesting topic. One important thing that comes to my mind when Hinduism is mentioned is the multiple avatars or re-incarnations of the different Gods and Goddesses who people worship.

Well Hindus do believe deeply in their traditions do have temples and holy places to substantiate their beliefs.There are loads of pilgrimage places that prove the existence.of Gods and Goddesses.

For example, Ramayan is a very popular and well known to many. In the story Lord Ram builds a bridge to reach Lanka to save Sita, well the bridge does exist in Rameshwaram, a place in south of India.

I can give you a another example. Lord Shiva and Meenakshi (Avatar of Hindu goddess Paravti) got married at a place called Madurai, it has a world famous temple built and in fact, the city is built around this temple. They do celebrate their marriage every year grandly in the city.

Similarly there are various places are over India that have a history associated with the presence of different Gods, which eventually is distinguished by the construction of a temple, gurudwara etc. Only by visiting such places do we actually come to know the truth and importance of the place. It is the belief in the end that matters and people travel from Kashmir to Kanyakumari to get the blessings.



BillyJean. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#15
I don't think it is appropriate to use the term mythology while referring to the sacred texts in Hinduism.
Since Hinduism it the most ancient religion, a lot of literary evidence is lost.
However, every day new archaeological evidence is being unearthed.
Like the unearthing of the submerged Dwaraka(abode of Krishna during Mahabharat times) and discovery of the Saraswati river, which was at one time considered to be a mythical river.
These discoveries throw light on the authenticity of the texts and the happenings of yore.
This topic can be discussed at great lengths, but it can spark debates and arguments.
Edited by SanayaIsBest - 11 years ago
Rockerchic thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#16
No I use the term Hindu mythology quite often. Because Mythology as it turns out is a misunderstood term, mythology itself means that it's a culturally based story which is believed to be true. It means it's a story which is based on religion and not science.

Since many myths have been debunked it's assumed that myth itself means something fake. But that's not necessarily true is it? It depends if you're a believer or not.


Edited by Rockerchic - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".