Originally posted by: Hina-
It is not correct in legal terms too Ratan wants custody of child not taking some property No one forced him for marrow He agreed in his own greed He called Ganga later Jagya was going to search for unrelated donor and later he is going over board in his blackmailing There is no point of backing out from JaGan First they never wanted to back out they were fine thinking no matter Mannu will stay away from them but remain alive but handing over a child to such people who are lusting to take him back even cannot wait for his recovery when he has to stay in hospital Tomorrow if JaGan fight for Mannu back why they are not right ? Its for the better of that child's life why they should stick to so called vachan and let Mannu's life ruined as they signed a paper the conditions on which are morally , ethically , legally, socially. incorrect? Even sometimes a lie in order to save an innocent is not declared sin in moral context so breaking such promise which was forced upon them is not wrong either I don't consider it utterly selfish , backing out , opportunists , backing out in anyway
Rat 's change of heart is not needed In court his case is weak thats why in condition he mentioned no Legal action The court will throw him and his deal out in one minute