i hate separation tracks

michelle281194 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1

W*F was the connection of gehna's sister getting married n then her side paining during the wedding?
I seriously thought that she would have to do bone marrow test for her kidney problem (i checked online, they do that) n then Mannu would be saved by her.
But now i guess these ppl are seriously planning a STUPID leap with Mannu being separate from the Singhs (which is a cliched ploy that i hate coz its a waste of so many precious childhood years) n Shashank will play his own kid n all that crap... Ugh.

I'm totally devastated.

Edited by michelle281194 - 11 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

52

Views

5.4k

Users

20

Likes

134

Frequent Posters

Sunna_Deewani thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
Mannu Ratan ke paas gaya toh 100% Leap zaroor hoga.
But if they don't plan to end the show (TRP reasons), i guess, Leap is better. Otherwise story right now is getting too tedious - either some drama in the name of social issue or some non-existing problems/drama being brought in.
-poloenigma- thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
They better show Anandi having her own baby (biological) before the dimwitted writers even think of bringing in a leap. This is so unfair to deprive the viewers of Anandi's pregnancy phase and her giving birth to her own child Honestly, this is the only happiness left to come into AnSh's life. It would be very unfair if they don't show it..
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
But if Mannu goes back to Ratan's family that will be like all efforts of Ganga to give a better childhood for Mannu have gone waste .
They better show her fighting back for Mannu.
Leap or no leap
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
Ganga fighting back for Mannu will not be morally right. It will be like making someone donate bone marrow on false promise and is utterly selfish to retract from their promise once their work got done. Once they (Ganga-Jagya) gave their word and their signature- they have to stick to it if they are not opportunists.
Only court has the power to give custody of Mannu back to Ganga. If creatives have planned Mannu's stay with Ganga, they can show court rejecting the papers signed by Jagya.
RainbowKitty thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#6

Seriously ?Were the conditions correct on so called moral and legal ground that JaGan should stick to something so wrong on moral grounds and they become utterly selfish and morally wrong, Opportunists fighting for the child back?In court too they will have to file a case or court is sitting only waiting for to reject Rat's deal on its own when no one will file against it so it means JaGan are morally wrong if they do so ?What is the logic of opportunist in here if the fight for their child back 😲

Edited by Hina- - 11 years ago
Sunna_Deewani thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Hina-

Seriously ?Were the conditions correct on so called moral and legal ground that JaGan should stick to something so wrong on moral grounds and they become utterly selfish and morally wrong, Opportunists fighting for the child back?In court too they will have to file a case or court is sitting only waiting for to reject Rat's deal on its own when no one will file against it so it means JaGan are morally wrong if they do so ?What is the logic of opportunist in here if the fight for their child back 😲


Ratan's demand is morally wrong, maybe legally wrong too. But Jagya and Ganga have agreed to it now. On this pretext only Ratan is agreeing for Bone Marrow transplant. If JaGan backtrack, its not right. Only way is ratan suddenly having a change of heart and giving mannu back😕.
RainbowKitty thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: Sunna_Deewani


Ratan's demand is morally wrong, maybe legally wrong too. But Jagya and Ganga have agreed to it now. On this pretext only Ratan is agreeing for Bone Marrow transplant. If JaGan backtrack, its not right. Only way is ratan suddenly having a change of heart and giving mannu back😕.

It is not correct in legal terms too Ratan wants custody of child not taking some property No one forced him for marrow He agreed in his own greed He called Ganga later Jagya was going to search for unrelated donor and later he is going over board in his blackmailing There is no point of backing out from JaGan First they never wanted to back out they were fine thinking no matter Mannu will stay away from them but remain alive but handing over a child to such people who are lusting to take him back even cannot wait for his recovery when he has to stay in hospital Tomorrow if JaGan fight for Mannu back why they are not right ? Its for the better of that child's life why they should stick to so called vachan and let Mannu's life ruined as they signed a paper the conditions on which are morally , ethically , legally, socially. incorrect? Even sometimes a lie in order to save an innocent is not declared sin in moral context so breaking such promise which was forced upon them is not wrong either I don't consider it utterly selfish , backing out , opportunists , backing out in anyway
Rat 's change of heart is not needed In court his case is weak thats why in condition he mentioned no Legal action The court will throw him and his deal out in one minute
Edited by Hina- - 11 years ago
tssvenkat thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#9
It looks like the legal document that they had signed seems like a masterplan but keeping mannu's condition JaGan were forced to sign the papers. I guess they can always legally file a case thinking mannu's future and welfare and counter argue the case stating that they were blackmailed at the last minute with no time to decide or negotiate. Also, Ratan's negative side can be brought out by Ganga and Padma if willing to stand for trial. They can also point out that a child can not be brought up in the circumstances where Rats main intention was and is to hurt JaGan family. I think Singhs can legally win Mannu back with no problem.
Edited by tssvenkat - 11 years ago
Wanderbug thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: Hina-

It is not correct in legal terms too Ratan wants custody of child not taking some property No one forced him for marrow He agreed in his own greed He called Ganga later Jagya was going to search for unrelated donor and later he is going over board in his blackmailing There is no point of backing out from JaGan First they never wanted to back out they were fine thinking no matter Mannu will stay away from them but remain alive but handing over a child to such people who are lusting to take him back even cannot wait for his recovery when he has to stay in hospital Tomorrow if JaGan fight for Mannu back why they are not right ? Its for the better of that child's life why they should stick to so called vachan and let Mannu's life ruined as they signed a paper the conditions on which are morally , ethically , legally, socially. incorrect? Even sometimes a lie in order to save an innocent is not declared sin in moral context so breaking such promise which was forced upon them is not wrong either I don't consider it utterly selfish , backing out , opportunists , backing out in anyway

Rat 's change of heart is not needed In court his case is weak thats why in condition he mentioned no Legal action The court will throw him and his deal out in one minute


I have a feeling that this is another way of bringing in Anandi to save the day. maybe they will ill-treat Mannu and coming to know of this Anandi will go to seek justice. The paper said no legal action from Jagya and his family. it didn't say anything about Government taking the action. so if Anandi or a 3rd party reports child abuse then its not going against Ratan's papers.

And maybe this will be another thing by which they will show Vivek helping the Singhs out... they way things are ... it could be a possibility.

Now, only thing is that if BV Cv's are angling for Leap and this is just an unoriginal thing they are forcing for post leap story.


Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".