Negative character

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

tanvismile

@tanvismile

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#61

Originally posted by: Hiral_Halwa

I do like Ansh + Jagan as a team

as in, me talking about that epi in which A came to talk to Ganga in hospital quarters...the four of them in one screen, looked great together - like the power of 4⭐️ - I dono I feel CVs are restricted both the pairs, by not integrating them together in a problematic situation

but thats occational ,once in while that too great ,i think during the time manu was kidnapped by rat,ansh with jagan.both were like a team,but it wasnt that great

Quote

tanvismile

@tanvismile

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#62

Originally posted by: Missesha
Nice topic Hiral,

I don't think its lack of antagonists but its the way CVs are handling their tracks - half-baked and rushed

Cvs had a great potential of making Ratan singh a villian in J-G's life. But they messed the track with introducing Sa and a triagular love story

Even Saurabh's track and court case was badly handled.

Sa turned out to be more irritating than negative.

Kashmir track was half-baked. Although I never ever wish to see that Vicki again.

And what happened to that corrupt collector

Most of the tracks Cvs are dishing out these days are to make one character a saint and another one as evil. Then they make efforts to change the evil character to saint. 😔

So, to come back to your question. I would say let Cvs work on something realistic and tell us a story in a flow, rather than pure good vs evil.

It can be good vs good too or normal tiffs in family due to differences in expectations, but it just has to be realistic and well done.

i agree ,they should put focus on story rather then creating evil v/s saint,earlier i feel bv wasnt like this,it was realistic,there were fights ,arguments,like ds toturing anandi favouring jagya but that was natural ,old people from those background are like that only,but now with sanchi ganga or sanchi anandi ,ira anandi it all done to glorify one character,now adays cvs just glorifying characters,any body in bv is doing something too great,there is no solid storyline ,gud they dint bring gauri ,i dont have any expections from cvs.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#63

Originally posted by: Missesha
Nice topic Hiral,

I don't think its lack of antagonists but its the way CVs are handling their tracks - half-baked and rushed

Cvs had a great potential of making Ratan singh a villian in J-G's life. But they messed the track with introducing Sa and a triagular love story

Even Saurabh's track and court case was badly handled.

Sa turned out to be more irritating than negative.

Kashmir track was half-baked. Although I never ever wish to see that Vicki again.

And what happened to that corrupt collector

Most of the tracks Cvs are dishing out these days are to make one character a saint and another one as evil. Then they make efforts to change the evil character to saint. 😔

So, to come back to your question. I would say let Cvs work on something realistic and tell us a story in a flow, rather than pure good vs evil.

It can be good vs good too or normal tiffs in family due to differences in expectations, but it just has to be realistic and well done.

bold - nice observation. In fact good vs evil is the simplest thing. They can show clash of interest where both the parties are good and right. I think more than an antagonist, creatives need a long term story plan. At present (in fact right after Anandi's marriage) their tracks seem to be haphazard - now this next something else. They should make broad outline of the story and then plan their track so that the tracks do not look like coming out of nowhere and then left in the middle jumping on some other track.

Quote

1 ... 3 4 5 6 7

Negative character - Page 7

Related Topics

Explore Topics