Posted:
It is thoroughly painful to watch the rape trail. I am not sure how it works in India, but it all seems a pathetic fiasco. Unlike in the US, the state prosecutes the accuser and it is his job to find an attorney to defend him, but it appears that the case in India is that both the rapist and the victim have to defend themselves...
Leaving that aside, here is what bewilders me...why didn't Mansi's attorney ask for the phone records for both Mansi, Kinari and Ruank and bring to court what had transpired that night and how this prompted Runak to rape her. They could have bring the phone is as evidence and reveal the phone recording...what a delight that would be to listen to in the court room. Here's hoping there is a writer who has the intelligence to be this creative. The fact that the three of them would be asked about the phone conversations would weaken the case and it is something even Runak's attorney does not know...
Additionally, just because Mansi could not see him in the night, doesn't mean she could not identify her..Mansi's attorney could have done the same and asked her to have Runak and a few others of those men repeat what was said to her and have her pick out the voice...
Additionally, I'd have Mansi disclose what was a distinguishing feature of Runak...if Kinari had intercourse with Runak, she would know this information and if not, then it will show that something happened...
Writers, when your audience is way ahead of you, then you should seriously die of shame.
I would welcome SOME creativity and intelligence...
Members Lounge
