Avoid or skip alexander track - Page 4

Poll

Do u dislike or skip alexander track

Login To Vote

Created

Last reply

Replies

39

Views

2k

Users

10

Likes

82

Frequent Posters

siyarati thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: Priya258

they take our views as joke
Jo audience unka show dekhke unko hi trp de unka opinion joke h
I don't say ki audience jo chahe wahi dikhaye but sometimes they should conside what audience like or not


CVs ke paas itna tym hota hoga ky, Jo humare forums ke topics, ek ek reply padenge??
Srsly ?? U think so??😲
mehaksingh13 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: LawlessLawyer

Let me clarify a few things over here once and for all which are strictly what I feel and I respect everyone else's opinions.

1.I do not belong to the category of TRP audience as I live abroad and watch the show online.The only scenes which I proudly skip are Shivdutt and Kanishk's scenes.But the audience who actually contribute to the TRPs by watching the show in their television sets and without changing the channel even during ad breaks do so for a reason.It's because they love the show and the characters.It's their choice and we cannot overlook that.

2.I have got no problem with any actor of this show.I love Rati since MJHT days and Rohit is one of my favourites.Through this show I grew to like Laksh a lot and I was also introduced to the gorgeous and brilliant Sameksha.Aditya,Suhani and everyone else are doing an awesome job.Therefore I don't think the actors are a problem either.

3.Yes I feel certain things can be changed about the show.Like Shivdutt and Kanishk's scenes can be reduced.Those scenes add to the negativity and tell me something honestly.Wouldn't people enjoy Anu-Bamni romance,Anu-Bamni-Puru's family time,RuChi's love story etc rather than those painful and heartbreaking torture scenes with Shivdutt? I know villains and negative characters are important but too much negativity is not good for any show.

4.As far as Alexander is concerned then he is an integral part of the show and no one can deny that.There are people who watch for Anusuya,there are people who watch for Puru and similarly there are people who watch for Alexander.He is there on the montage with Puru and he should get the importance which he deserves.Not as much as Puru but certainly more than characters like Kanishk and Shivdutt.

5.Also I will never understand the point of making this issue a Puru vs Alexander thing.Some time ago it was Puru vs Bamni and now Puru vs Alexander.
No character on this show is perfect.Neither Puru nor Alexander.
Therefore I don't understand the point behind criticising any character unnecessarily.Yes everyone has the right to express their views,take things in a light manner and have fun.I myself have made fun posts.But there is a point where we have to draw a line.Mocking the characters beyond a limit is not fun from any angle.
And many a times,limits are crossed and under the pretext of a joke,India,it's values and it's customs are mocked which is unacceptable atleast to me.

6.Lastly @meheksingh mentioned the producers are not going to care for our opinions.They will show what they want to show and they won't change as per our wishes.
So we can either watch and enjoy the show or quit it.


friend this is my experience. in some previous shows which i used to watch though the trps were falling drastically the producers and channels never bothered . now too same is happening in case of other shows. Once my friends during CN days used to cry to show CGM not as a man making cowdung cakes. picking up drumsticks to cook for his wife milking the cows, fear about honey bee and hiding in a box along with wife etc with regard to the great CGM but to show his wars and political administration nobody bothered. then why do they bother now? as long as business goes on reasonably good they don't bother about minority group complaints. and that too when they r getting too positive reports about the show on facebook and producers insta compared to negative comments why do they bother. it is for us whether to continue or not if we don't like the show. but they don't bother. this is the opinion of many. just for timepass we argue among ourselves about the characterisation, scenes etc of any show!!
486792 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: mehaksingh13

friend this is my experience. in some previous shows which i used to watch though the trps were falling drastically the producers and channels never bothered . now too same is happening in case of other shows. Once my friends during CN days used to cry to show CGM not as a man making cowdung cakes. picking up drumsticks to cook for his wife milking the cows, fear about honey bee and hiding in a box along with wife etc with regard to the great CGM but to show his wars and political administration nobody bothered. then why do they bother now? as long as business goes on reasonably good they don't bother about minority group complaints. and that too when they r getting too positive reports about the show on facebook and producers insta compared to negative comments why do they bother. it is for us whether to continue or not if we don't like the show. but they don't bother. this is the opinion of many. just for timepass we argue among ourselves about the characterisation, scenes etc of any show!!

There you said it.
It's all business for the PH.The show will continue to do well,producer will get profits,the actors will get name,fame,money,insta followers and move on to the next show.Fans who enjoy the show will enjoy it.
Only we will be left behind on the forum debating over this and breaking our heads like a coconut 🤪🤣

I doubt the CVs even come to the forum and even if they do so they would have a great deal of entertainment at our expense😆

So from now onwards I am not gonna fry and grill my head and enjoy the actors' brilliant performances.





rahulkrishna24 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

see persian track had decreased trp...this is not something i am saying...this is what trp's are representing ...i hope you are understanding ...i am not making trp's dear. And again persia track...not alone alex. And no i didnt feel like you are targeting me or something like that. i did got your point in the first go ...so no need of sorry at all. I told you that it wasnt for you because not every statement i was talking about was made by you. I was talking about forum condition in general.

What i don't understand is even if someone wants to voice out as puru characterization is not good for them...why can't it be said like i personally don't like puru characterization and found it weak then generalizing it for the audience or using unnecessary wrong words. If people want to appreciate alexander...why a parallel needs to be drawn and ridiculing of puru as a character or pourav rashtra tracks need to be done. Its ironical that people on this forum feel bad when alex is not treated well to glorify puru in the show but the same is done in this forum only just the roles are reversed.


once when i posted the same my post was mocked. my intention at that time was producers used alex on montage to show macedonian side and pr side to attract viewers but they gave shivdutt anu bamni and dasyus also more screen space as the show is almost biopic of porus and even laachi also not getting more. shradda hrishikesh etc actors r very very famous with cid series. it doesn't mean they r neglected. in the story of puru which has no records if they show as he has a family and his sufferings etc what is wrong. how do they show a biopic without showing his version and show directly his enemy and war which is final to end the show? and when they don't show all these how can alex role gets more screen space? if they want to give equal screen space they would have given a different title to the show. it is minimum reasoning for porus character and his family gets more screen space.
Edited by rahulkrishna24 - 7 years ago
EtherealRati thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9



Trp don't increase or decrease by only one character., I said anusuya , shivdutt & Darius inhe jitna screen space Mila itna agar Alex Ko milta to trp kuch aur hoti , I still say d same , no where I blamed anusuya 4 low trp. Anusuya & shivdutt r not main leads, infact they r not second lead also, they r frictional characters who had been given 2 much screen space . Puru definitely need better tracks then family drama, Puru Ko uske hi track Mai development nhi milta, Alex Ko jyada screen space milega tabhi viewer Ko uska track samajh Mai aayega

Frictional character like anusuya , bamini , shivdutt they have nothing 2 do much in story line except drama

again the same thing...kase pata aapko ki achi hi hoti...aakashwaani hain yeh ???.,...
Regarding anusuya...see according to this show, jitne bhi characters hain is show mein real hain...atleast makers have shown that and people who are watching believe that too...especially people who have no real idea about history...they do believe that anusuya and bamni puru ke parents the,,...Anusuya is an important character for siddharth sir and thus an imp. one in show...this show is made by him...kis character ko important rakhna hain...kisko nahi rakhna is upto him...ab ofcourse anusuya is not important than porus or alexander ...but ya after these two ...its anusuya mostly...jis tarike se story mein dikhaya hain aur agar nahi bhi hain...toh bhi its okay...the kind of scenes rati di get to perform as anusuya on this show is more than enough for me. I am way too happy with the screenspace she got too...this show has given her a platform back...and i am thankful to siddharth sir for that...as a fan ...i always want to see more of her but i do understand this show isnt all about anusuya...Rati di isnt playing the main lead here ...but ya her character still holds quiet an importance in pourav rashtra tracks. May be whatever is drama for you is not the same to others...waise bhi drama toh yeh show hi hain...historical drama as they say.
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago
#36
Surbhi do u really believe viewers accept any stupidity shown on d historical shows. Viewers r not idiot when start seeing any historical series mostly they start 2 cross check d facts from net. Makers run a disclaimer that serial is created 4 entertainment, viewers already knew story is frictional, they just enjoy d characters played by actors. Nobody truly believe anubamini r parents of Puru , on net also articles r there about frictional character of anubamini,
On this forum many members have very gud knowledge of history, I m only saying about myself I have little bit knowledge of history , I only see indian historical serial , I definitely can't digest only a family drama 4 Puru, coz I definitely expect better tracks 4 Puru than family drama
Edited by deepikagupta9 - 7 years ago
EtherealRati thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Surbhi do u really believe viewers accept any stupidity shown on d historical shows. Viewers r not idiot when start seeing any historical series mostly they start 2 cross check d facts from net. Makers run a disclaimer that serial is created 4 entertainment, viewers already knew story is frictional, they just enjoy d characters played by actors. Nobody truly believe anubamini r parents of Puru , on net also articles r there about frictional character of anubamini,

Yes they do...when porus started...i did believed that anusuya and bamni are his parents...my sister did believed as well...my mom still believes...when i say..she tells ki jab pata hi nahi hai toh phir toh kuch bhi ho sakta hain...porus ke parents ke baarein mein kahi hain hi nahi...kaha se cross check karega koi...and.sab ke paas nahi hota hain itna time deepika that they sit and cross check. Hardly people do that...where is a article that anusuya bamni are fictional ??????...i never saw that...and even if that's there on internet...nobody has the time...the disclaimer is for all the characters in the show and their actions...yeh nahi aata hain likha ki bamni anusuya frictional hain...alex side ke sab asli hain...audience ko kya pata ...kaun asli kaun nakli...woh toh bas entertainment ke liye dekhte hain yeh show...history quiz thodi khelne ja rahe .😆
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago
#38
History quiz nhi khelni par serial ki story dekh Kar koi bhi bata Sakta hai ki story frictional hai, maybe Surbhi u don't have time & believe everything shown on TV but not only in this forum b ut every historical or mythological serial forum people do post article related 2 serial coz they have knowledge of tha t serial. Nowdays viewers don't believe on every thing on tv.
Edited by deepikagupta9 - 7 years ago
EtherealRati thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

History quiz nhi khelni par serial ki story dekh Kar koi bhi bata Sakta hai ki story frictional hai, maybe Surbhi u don't have time & believe everything shown on TV but not only in this forum b ut every historical or mythological serial forum people do post article related 2 serial.

haan story frictional hain bata sakte...but anusuya aur bamni naam bhi frictional hain.thats hard for people who have never listened olympia and philip name either...they only know porus and alexander...see i am not speaking hawa mein...i have seen people watching it that way...
exactly people on forums do it...eventually hamare paas jab time hota hain...hum forum par tabhi aate hain...and everybody watching porus isnt on forum...moreover others dont even have access to internet...some people toh go to cyber cafe to access internet too...i am sure waha jakar yeh nahi check karenge ki anusuya bamni asli naam hain ya nakli...there are people who are interested in history and they will ofcourse know many facts from before and will love to dig in...but the same is not the case with major audience.
Priya258 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#40
When Puru went to Faras at that time Alex ne jab ek bache ko marne kaha my mother said kitna cruel tha ye Alexander.Tan tak I was reading some articles on Alex I clarified to her that whatever they are showing is not 100% true.There is not much info of King Puru.Aur koi King or Yubraj pagal nai h jo itna dur faras jayega.Darius III never came to India but our beloved cvs was so in love with him ki 20 saal darius India me aata jaata raha h.
We get frustrated when we see jo history me h uska ulta show me hota h.
But we forget for makers if anything matters to them is only Money.It's their business.
Jo bhi wo dikha rehe h aankh band karke believe nai kar sakte.
All don't time some don't have internet access I agree with that but it will not change the truth.Those people will have misconception regarding history.
I am Rati fan but Bamni Anusuya Shivdutt Kanishk yesab Real King Puru ke history me mention nai h.Cross check karne ki zarurat hi nai h.Kyun ki kuch info hai hi nai how he was as a king,what was his mother role,what was their name.As kuch info nai h makers ne kuch fictional naam liye.
Rati as Anusuya is doing great.
But use show me Sirf historical facts 10% bhi nai h.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".