RUSHALI - THE ROOT OF ALL EVILS - Page 2

Originally posted by: bhallarox

I agree with you jklp, I think Rushali is the main culprit here. She is the one who has caused trouble for Ankita, Naren is also no better. He has also hurt Ankita a lot and been very rude to her, even though Ankita had done so much for him, he has rudely told her to go and die and also encouraged her to leave Mumbai knowing she was pregnant. Pari I dont blame as much because she has the worst parents ever, Purvi and Arjun, who have nothing else to do then to enjoy themselves in Australia, neglecting the entire family and just enjoying, thats what they have been doing these last 5 years probably, Pari mentioned that her parents were dead but she might be being kept in the dark, I really dont think Arjun/Purvi are dead but probably somewhere in Australia enjoying, both of them have been awful parents, Purvi never bothered to contact Pari once she left to Australia, Pari lost her baby but all this doesnt matter to them, Arjun did not try to contact Pari/Pia, neither did they ever try to make Pari a better person.

@Bold

Now that Arjun and Purvi are no more in the show ,why are you dragging them in these posts when it is not necessary ?
Now Pari is been shown as a vamp and a negative character just because that Ankita could be shown as a Mahan and a Sacrificing lead..
Manav's decision was wrong,he could had given some part of his property to Teju and Pari..He says that both of his grand daughters are same for him but he did differentiated between them by giving all the property to Ankita who is a daughter of a criminal.
Now Manav and Archana has forgotten that their Soham is a criminal and a murderer ,He killed Gauri just because of his obsession and in his rage..Why isn't Soham is shown to be punished ?
Why is Ankita shown to be a Justice Queen,If she is then she should hand over her father to police so that he could serve his punishment for killing Gauri..

Pari hasn't been shown as negative to make Ankita look good and sacrificing cos even before the leap (and Pari turning negative), Ankita was shown as good and sacrificing, even if foolish, and she is still the same. Ankita had sacrificed a lot so in a way she had audience sympathy already. Pari has been made negative to make Naren look good.

Pari has been made negative so that audience sympathises with Naren and wishes for Naren-Ankita to get back together at least for Ashi's sake if not anything else- the same audience who wanted that Naren should never get Ashi's custody cos his Mom kidnapped Ashi from Ankita and that Naren-Ankita shouldn't unite ever after all that had happened. That is also why Naren is being shown as such a loving father and Pari as the overtly negative 'mother' from whom Ashi needs to get away, so that they can justify the breaking up of this marriage and Anken marriage later.

The creatives are trying to make Naren look like a character who deserves sympathy and that he should be accepted cos he has a miserable wife and loves Ashi while Ankita deserves and loves Ashi and Naren and thus 'trick' the audience into accepting Naren-Ankita again, bcos right now the 'fair' thing (also, what most of the audience would want) is for Rannvijay-Ankita to be together bcos he was the one who loves her and supported her all through, also cos Ankita-Vaishnavi love each other a lot and of course, Ankita MUST be united with her baby who was separated from her at birth.

This is another reason why Naren isn't appealing to me at all- he hasn't become a hero post leap by his own actions (he has done nothing right except for his love for Ashi) - rather they are trying to convince him deserving of Ankita by making Pari look bad and getting him the sympathy. I'm sure later they will suddenly show Rannvijay as negative to convince us of the Anken marriage, and once again, I will hate it.

writers are destroying all other characters to make naren hero again .they even destroyed ankitas character by making her to dance with him when her fiance is in coma.

@Bold

Now Pari is been shown as a vamp and a negative character just because that Ankita could be shown as a Mahan and a Sacrificing lead..


@ yes this is besic in pr ...bcz before it they did same with ovi...for trying to show arjun and purvi's stupid action is right ...so no strange for pari...where ovi's character was lovely and innocent but they can changed it...and purvi was smart but changed as stupid for proved ovi is right ...then what particle is pari...she is rude and selfcentred girl from the starting...
Manav's decision was wrong,he could had given some part of his property to Teju and Pari.
@ not only teju and pari but pia and gaurav, prasant and mansi has also right...but here is question about MD post so for entire company the MD post is one , one people can sit there ...who will be best among all that was ankita now...and one thing manav did not give entire property to ankita but gave only MD post and he is still chaiman...then how can he will be choose everyone for one property...

.He says that both of his grand daughters are same for him but he did differentiated between them by giving all the property to Ankita who is a daughter of a criminal.

ankita's father is a criminal...is it ankita's fault ...after prove herself as a good and selfless person ...strange people considered her a s a criminal daughter and she should not get anything...soham is a killer and he should get punishment but why his child...who are even not born at that time....
Now Manav and Archana has forgotten that their Soham is a criminal and a murderer ,He killed Gauri just because of his obsession and in his rage..Why isn't Soham is shown to be punished ?
Why is Ankita shown to be a Justice Queen,If she is then she should hand over her father to police so that he could serve his punishment for killing Gauri..

ankita already have lot of work and responsibility due to her criminal and looser father...so blaming her is not good ...its arman responsibility not ankita's ...