Originally posted by: bitasta
Strange isn't it, Pallavi di? It seems CVs have a natural disdain towards Purvi's character. Million dollar question is " Why?". Just because Arvi reunion was not in the book, but a forced sequence owing to an unprecedented public demand? Otherwise why show Arjun and Purvi in the most unsympathetic light? As you keep on saying and I agree wholeheartedly the worst of everything ( storyline, plots, dialogues, execution, costumes, make-up and so and so) is reserved for Ashvik.
And the indifference towards Arvi's second baby is the heights of it. Had they shown the miscarriage, it would at least have been a plausible reason for their separation. If the baby is still alive, it would show Arjun Purvi in worse light: Arjun for not reaching for either of his children and Purvi for keeping away both of their children away from Arjun.
@ Red : My grouse exactly. When the other female characters lose a child or have a miscarriage, albeit due to their own folly or cruelty towards the baby, the CVS milk the last pathos out of the situation. The forum floods with sympathy for that character.
@ Blue: And here if Purvi has lost her unborn due to shock ( which is not her fault), doesn't she deserve some sympathy from the CVs and audience as well? Just because it is Arvi's baby doesn't mean that CVs can leave this track with loose ends.
Just show if Purvi had miscarried, Arvi's second child is alive and elusive Rohan is their child, just bring in a Dhruv out of blue as Arvi's child...but please do show something about the child for God's sake. The audience ( especially the one who like, sympathize with or even love Arjun and Purvi) need a closure on this matter.
@ Fuchsia : Can we ask them to put on their thinking cap instead?