Disgusting !!! Wrng Pg.3 - Page 2

Originally posted by: eshaaax3.

Oh please anything related to Arjun, Purvi is automatically disgusting. Ab aar Purvi koi chamaach haath de toh woh illegal saman ban jayga, agar Arjun koi grocery bag ko haath lagai toh woh un-edible ho jata hai, relax-

Pari, whether or not concieved before or after marriage IS legally Arjun Kirloskar's daughter.

If youre so keen to bring in culture etc, Arjun has named her LEGALLY and RELIGIOUSLY at the Namkaaran ceremony.

A baby is a baby- if marriage is "God Saman", you must also be aware that a baby can only be a form of God's Angels. These illegitmate, najayaz, illegal terms are HUMAN made- not GOD made sorry.

Sure Pari is an out of wedlock by two days child, but SHES A BABY FOR GODS SAKE ! She doesn't even have common sense yet forget understand whats going on around her.


If a baby born out of wedlock is illegal, is a baby born after marriage still legal if he/she acts illegally?


jo bhi ho,

"They see us rollin, they hatinnn"

Exactly my point, thank you. I'm not talking about arjun purvi or even PMS. I actually am from a religious and conservative family and don't believe in sex or kids before marriage but my religion never taught me to call a little child illegitimate. Why should that child suffer whole life ( people calling names and stuff ) just because of his / her parents fault ?

Originally posted by: aRchiE_frieNds

Exactly what I mean in my post , please read it again ...people instead of getting westernized wearing western clothes and speaking English should broaden their thinking , that's more important.
I'm not supporting PMS , I'm very much into Indian culture and trying to incorporate that in my kids too but calling a little child illegitimate for the mistake their parents did was never right in the past century and will never be right for me. Why should that child suffer while he/she is little or even while growing up ? What's his/her fault ?

Disregarding Pari's Naamkaran by her legal and biological father means insulting Indian heritage and religious ceremony!

I don't usually post but, I felt compelled this time... In India a child is also thought of as an embodiment of God...so then why is the iiligimate tag ok?

Originally posted by: punirashakti

hello dear...

India main marriage ko god ke samaan mana jaata hai...usme kya hua agar ab 21st century chal rahi hai...iska yeh toh kataiii matalab nahi hota ki aap apane indian golden values n morality bhul jao...

rahi baat illeagal child ki toh yeh sach hi hai pari is illegal child kyunki onir ne chaha usse respectful life dena bt uske bio-parents ne uspe paani fer diya...aur usse duniya ke saamne...najaayaj ka tag laga diya...

purvi ne b4 marriage sex kiya yeh galat hi hai...uske upar usne uss mangetar ko ditch kiya wo bhi galat hai...itana hi nahi wo prego hai yeh jaanane ke baad bhi kisiko na batake Mumbai se bhag gai yeh toh sabse badi galati hai jiski koi maafi nahi...

pari is illeagal child yeh ek kadawa sach hai...jo na kal badala tha...na aaj badalega...aur na future me badalega...bcs of her useless n unresponsible bio parents...

I hv sympathy for poor innocent child pari...par wat to do nw her bio parents hi uske is najaayaj tag ke liye responsible hai.

Originally posted by: nkkolas

I don't usually post but, I felt compelled this time... In India a child is also thought of as an embodiment of God...so then why is the iiligimate tag ok?

Originally posted by: punirashakti

yes child is also as an embodiment of god...bt in pr der bio-parents already prove pari is der illeagal child b4 wedlock...dats the kadawa truth...none rub dis ever...

Dude get a life 😡 by calling a small child names you are only making yourself look pathetic 🤢 . Get a life and next time pick on someone your own age.

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Disregarding Pari's Naamkaran by her legal and biological father means insulting Indian heritage and religious ceremony!

So true!! The do called moral brigade on this forum has conveniently forgotten about this important detail. Pari will always be pari arjun KIRLOSKAR , no matter what. 😃

Originally posted by: punirashakti

yes child is also as an embodiment of god...bt in pr der bio-parents already prove pari is der illeagal child b4 wedlock...dats the kadawa truth...none rub dis ever...

Originally posted by: arvifanalways

Dude get a life 😡 by calling a small child names you are only making yourself look pathetic 🤢 . Get a life and next time pick on someone your own age.

A baby is never jayaz or najayaz. When the father has given his name to the baby and the mother has agreed to bring her in the world toh legality ki baat hi nahi aati. It's an individual's decision and about the Indian culture its a hypocritical culture where rule changes when baat apne pe aaye.