Originally posted by: vasu_2013
My friend, I do not agree to majority of your theory that
a) Purvi initiated sex
b) Purvi's story is a lie - fyi, what was shown earlier was what happened inside the hut and what was shown yesterday was prior to that
the video which i put the link of it shows what happened prior to hut scene, it doesn't show what happened inside hut...
c) Purvi and Arjun did not have sex outside the hospital because Onir was there. I would not even attempt to debate about this
so if noone is there around then they can have sex again
You are quoting one example of the affidavit, unfortunately cannot view your youtube clip now but there are many occasions that she has also taken the blame for Ovi without exposing her. Remember when Ovi accused Purvi of theft, she silently accepted that as she did not want to expose Ovi? And did she not protect Ovi on the biggest deal by not exposing her? Who would have known the true colours of Ovi if she had not put the phone on speaker and Arjun happened to hear that?
see the theft thingy, Ovi was talking about pictures, and purvi thought about bottle, and Teju told about pictures...so it was good Manav asked her why she accepted when she didnot take anything...she took and accepted...and in my view for Ovi purvi was more dangerous than alcohol at that situation
On the "pre-marital" sex, I am confused if it is a problem or not as I hear differing views but nevertheless, Purvi is bashed.
noone is opposing premarital sex...people oppose it as
1. Middle class sanskars they portrayed in the show doesn't support it
2. The way they didnot respect the situation and made a whole mess without telling truth to everyone makes it bad...
Purvi is not bashed here, her sanskars are bashed here, her way of lying is bashed here...if near death expi made the situation for consummation then she should have asked Arjun to prove his true love so mnay times...
The family mourned for a lost baby and that was the truth. If that is apshagun, how do you support Ovi who claims she is not married when her husband is still alive? Why do not call her a liar when she had already decided on the divorce but cited to Manav that Purvi being in Arjun's room as the reason for her wanting to be separated from Arjun?
there is a difference...family mourned on a live baby thinking it is dead, which is apshagun...
if you say Purvi being in wet cloths in Arjun's room without permission is valid then whatever Ovi is doing is valid...
if Purvi can still have relationship with Arjun is valid then Ovi saying she is not married is valid too...
and Ovi saying she is not married will not make Purvi's wrongs as right...
Last but not least, I find it strange that you do not have problems Ovi demanding why didn't Purvi abort her baby but you blame Purvi that she made Ovi look bad by asking how can a mother harm her baby? 😲 Can't believe this.
yes...if Purvi claims that she wants happiness in ArOvi then she should have aborted the kid...don't you think Pari makes ArVi to come together...Pari makes hopes of ArVi reunion which makes Purvi a big liar who says she wanted ArOvi happiness...
Having said all this, I agree that good intentions or not, Purvi did lie about pari being Ovi's baby, . She should realize her mistake on that part.