Can I ask a question KC?
(This is an honest question, not meant to offend or provoke any negative reaction) This is a question I wanted to ask for sometime.
If Ovi had no rights over Arjun because he did not love her, even though they were engaged, doesn't that mean that every arrange marriage in the history of India should be terminated? Didn't the majority of those arrange marriages begin without love? Didn't some even resent those they were engaged to initially?
Didn't some of those marriages eventually turn into love, not to mention the birth of billions of special children?
Let us retrace our steps, to before Ovi put forward the deal to Purvi:
Whether or Not Arjun loved Ovi, he is the one who engaged her, there was no gun involved. Ovi made a feeble attempt of making him jealous, and he fell for it, because obviously he had some attraction for her, correct or not? So, how is that a trick or force? A man cannot be jealous and have no feelings, correct or not?
Once Arjun engaged Ovi, she had full rights on him, whether or not he was in love. He agreed to this proposal, correct or not?
When a Marriage is fixed, shouldn't it be taken seriously? Correct or not?
Arjun broke the rules of engagement when he got himself involved with Purvi. Arjun could have avoided this in many ways. I am sure it is quite normal to be attracted to someone even if you are attached, but I am sure there is awareness that you can avoid going deeper by distancing yourself and focusing on your commitment, correct or not?
Almost everyone is a potential soul mate for any person in life, when you think about it. However, it is the choice of deciding to commit that changes the game.
Arjun made a commitment and broke it.
Was Ovi supposed to forget that commitment also? In which world is it so perfect that the man will break his commitment and miraculously the woman feels the same way at the same time? Rarely.
There is normally one person who is still hung up on the relationship, sometimes for a little while sometimes almost forever.
Purvi had a choice, when Arjun told her he was engaged. Instead she waited for him to break off with Ovi. She was part of this big betrayal. As a woman she should have thought of Ovi, and how it would feel if she was in her place. However, Purvi never feels that her decisions are wrong, that is what makes her so dangerous.
Purvi really thought that her love built on a whole family's unhappiness could possibly be true love? A woman should understand and know these feelings more than a man. Ekta obviously does not understand this.
With that said, couldn't Ovi have been still hung up and feels that she has every right and was wronged by Arjun and Purvi, to the point where she puts forth a deal?
Since Arjun and Purvi felt strongly enough about their feelings for each other, where they were planning a wedding, while Ovi was planning her own funeral, how could a mere deal change their well laid plans? Weren't they meant for each other?
I believe that when Ovi put forth the deal using Archana's name, it is possible Purvi realised the shame in what she was doing. It does not matter if Arjun and Purvi fell in love under the most unfortunate circumstances, but do they have any right to forged their relationship on the framework of lies and betrayal? On the destruction of a family?
I can't see how that is right.
We know Manav and Archana were willing to let their daughter die a thousand deaths for Purvi's happiness, but I am ashamed to call them parents, because Arjun and Purvi's coming together was brutally done.
Maybe if Arjun had gone to Canada long before the drama, and sat Ovi down and explained, I would not be so turned off by Arjun and Purvi being together. However, they both handle this situation in a horrible unfeeling way towards Ovi.
Purvi should be ashamed as a female. I now completely with others that Ovi had a right to put forth a deal and bring down a heartless girl like Purvi and make her parents feel like crap for siding with the girl who facilitated the destruction of their BIO daughter.
Nothing is wrong with being adopted, but Purvi had no shame in taking Arjun, it is Ovi's deal that made her backtrack. I don't believe she did it directly for Archana or she would not have gone ahead to plan a wedding in the first place. I believe when Ovi put forth the deal, she saw that she was doing a grave injustice on Archana who took care of her, instead of her own children. She could not ignore Ovi's deal, because her wedding equals "Betraying Archana."
If I had any possible thoughts of maybe misjudging Purvi, she erased that completely when she gave Pari to Ovi and then once again backtrack to tell the truth, when Punni put forth her deal. She could have easily exposed Punni regarding the house. When it was a question of her dirty secret being exposed, she chose to give her baby to Ovi. Now when it is a question of Manav's (Sulo's) house, there is no thought of Ovi, she is ready to sing like a bird.
Purvi does not have a genuine bone in her body. She goes with the waves, goes with the motion of the ocean. She is as fickle as fickle can be. Purvi only thinks of Purvi.
What was done to Ovi was and still is a grave injustice by arranged marriage standards, since we are made to believe that Arjun does not love Ovi.
Please no offence meant to readers of this post
Edited by hillydee - 12 years ago
Marathi TV
