Kool's Commentary : 8 Oct PR - Page 9

Created

Last reply

Replies

142

Views

11.3k

Users

12

Likes

584

Frequent Posters

Dabulls23 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#81

Originally posted by: Kalapi

Jeejus are some priced possession in Ekta serialsšŸ˜†šŸ˜‰...all SILs only run after them for some reasonšŸ˜†šŸ˜‰šŸ˜‰šŸ¤£...

You are really one of the best DA šŸ‘ šŸ‘and that is a huge compliment, my dear šŸ¤—and I also consider myself quite a good DA😃, since I can argue both sides effectively most of the time..šŸ˜†

Jiju's are rare but priced commondities in EK world ...You cracked me up šŸ˜†šŸ˜†
Not only we are Dinosaurs of IF but DA too now šŸ˜†šŸ˜† Thank you my darling Partner in Crime šŸ¤— What would I do without you šŸ˜†
On a serious note we do try to see both sides when and all possible...Support right and criticize wrongs ofcourse our perception people will say...But someone's got to be DA and do the dirty job so here we are 😃
Kalapi thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#82

hamko mary nahee mangta, hamko lilly nahee mangta

hamko sandra from bandra nahee mangta, toh kaun mangta

hey JeeJu JeejušŸ˜†šŸ˜†šŸ˜†šŸ˜†šŸ¤£

Varsha, I agree…the forum need some contrary views…..people need to hear the other side of the argument too, besides, how is it fun if everyone says the same thing…I get bored so easily…

koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#83
Did Purvi join the rival company

now why that did not surprise me

so after doing satyanash of Arjun's life she is not satisfied she wants to do satyanash of him professionally too

Now i wonder how DK will react to it

First this girl dumped his son now she has joined rival company and son is not enjoying his marrige and become devdas

and what is dear Archana saying about her tyaagi daughter ...who has joined her damad's rival company

isn't it her duty to ensure damad's success and advise her adopted daughter who has been nothing but trouble to her family since day one to join any company but this company ...anyways she was just sitting at home

chalo maan liya Puri did not know this fact while joining ...after knowing she can resign yes

or no šŸ˜‰ to rub it in lover boy's face like the wedding invitation was rubbed in Ovi's face as 'farz'
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#84
Dear Kalapi,

I agree with all your comments about the disruption that the 7 year rule can cause, but they have to have some specific time period, and not too short a one. Otherwise greedy relatives would grab the property in no time. Most such cases relate to amnesia or to those missing in action in a war. I think the 7 year period applies in many other countries as well.

Priya does try to call Ram when she learns that she is expecting, not once but thrice, but he is very depressed and he does not pick up the call. When she finally does get thru, it is when he is at a restaurant with Vikram and Neha, and he takes the call. But just at that moment, he spots a lady sitting at another table wearing a pair of earrings that Priya was looking for without success. So he goes across to that lady and starts praising her earrings as a preliminary to asking her for them. Priya hears this part of the conversation, which sounds flirtatious, and so she concludes that he has got over her and drops the idea of telling him about the baby. So you see, one can blame her, and severely, for her initial decision to promote his 'moving on' and not suffering with a wife in jail for 14 years, as being both very stupid and irresponsible. But one cannot blame her for telling him nothing about the baby.

Even now, Priya had no notion of returning to Ram; she is planning to return to Dubai, and her meeting him at that wedding was a pure accident. She does not meet him and claim him in Dubai at that party solely because, just as she is going to do so, she learns that Ram has married Ayesha, and she does not want to disrupt that marriage. Now of course she knows that it is only a marriage for form's sake, which changes a lot of things.

As for Ayesha, she was the one who got Priya into prison in the first place thru her testimony in favour of Sid.What is more, she doesn't care a hoot for Ram, or for her son Kush, or indeed for anything or anyone else except herself. She has always been a terminally selfish and unfeeling woman, and how she could do what she did to Priya, who stood up for her at every point and never counted any cost when it came to her, passes my understanding. To my mind, horsewhipping is too good for someone like Ayesha.

And as for little Kush, his life would made, not disrupted, if Priya were to take charge of him. A worse mother than the one the poor kid has now can hardly be imagined! As it is, he is far happier with Natasha than with his mother.

Even if none of this applied, if an amnesia victim regains her memory and returns after 6 years, the new spouse just has to lump it. it cannot be helped. It is unfair on the new spouse (and I do not count a golddigger like Ayesha here), but the law is the law, and the three have to work it out between themselves as best as they can.

Shyamala


Originally posted by: Kalapi

Kool,

Yes, Priya never even contacted Ram when she came to know her pregnancy. Wasn't Ram entitled to this info? She continuously took decisions on behalf of others in the name of all kind of justifications'God, how the leads are glorified, when some decisions can't be solely theirs to make.

Shymala,

Wasn't the 7 yr loophole used cleverly by the Cvs here? How convenient it is to have Priya come back after 5 yrs, when she just knew exactly where Ram lived etc. all these years. She wasn't the one losing her mental stability, either. It was rather a cool and calculated move and then she chose to hide her daughter for Ram, who had every right to this piece of info., in my opinion.

I am especially interested in this 7 yrs loophole. Priya was assumed and in all possibilities considered death after the accident. In this scenario, how can the 7 yr rule be applied? What if Ram really did move on and married someone and is happily leading a married life. It is unfair, for a wife to appear after 5 yrs and just disrupt the other wife/kids family? Somehow, this doesn't seem fair at all.

Now, if Priya was just declared missing, even then, isn't 7 yrs too long a wait. What is there are circumstances like a small kid is involved and the family decides to get the hubby married for the sake of the child. What if the hubby, after awhile of mourning, moves on and finds a girl and gets married? It is so unfair to this girl, because the first wife suddenly appears from nowhere? I find at this age, a 7 yrs wait is just not acceptable'it is a long time to wait to keep life 'on a hold' and see if someone wants to make that appearance. Even if this person lost mental stability or something, that doesn't give the person the right anymore even then to disrupt someone else's life. Unfair, yes, but when is life fair'at best, life is bitter sweet😃

In case of Ayesha, she might be evil personified, but she did make a life for herself and for her son. How fair is this to this son, for Priya to come and disrupt a setup that was working, in a sense'

As for Arjun/Ovi and Purvi mess, I too don't care where the banana finally lands up, rather am interested to see who gets to peel it firstšŸ˜†

koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#85
Balan is astute without being overtly emotional ...he knows if police search his house the photos will be trouble . Clever man .
Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 13 years ago
koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#86
I don't see the serial but the baby is a different issue altogether ...the father has a right to know . The mother's personal feelings about him don't count . Whether she finds him flirtatious whether their love story has ended , whether he is a bigamist like Dharmesh ...he has a legal right to know as it takes 2 to make a baby . If he has gone away from the mother's heart she can file for divorce and opt not to live with him . But the child is a seperate issue altogether . One must not mix the 2 issues . One must never mix the personal feelings as a wife with his rights to his child .
koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#87
And i find it hard to beileve that Purvi who knew everything about the company and attended so many meetings on the company's behalf did not know its rivals . Thats the first thing one knows while one joins that position . I hope DK takes serious serious offense .
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#88
Kools,

I agree, and it is not just the husband's right to know about the baby, it is also the kid's right to have the love of a father.

That is why I said earlier that Priya was irresponsible and stupid, but as for the baby angle, it is not that she does it deliberately. Nor is it that she stops loving her husband. She still loves him very deeply and is an emotional mess, and she regrets what she did off and on all the 5 years that follow, only she does not have the guts to come clean at a later stage. She feels increasingly that what she did is very unfair to both her husband and her daughter, but then this is a Balaji serial, and everyone has his or her head screwed on all wrong!

In fact , this baby and faking death things are nothing compared to the lunacy about a fake divorce demand by Priya earlier, with the stated objective of exposing her wicked step-MIL. There is nothing that the Balaji folks cannot cook up,

Shyamala

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

I don't see the serial but the baby is a different issue altogether ...the father has a right to know . The mother's personal feelings about him don't count . Whether she finds him flirtatious whether their love story has ended , whether he is a bigamist like Dharmesh ...he has a legal right to know as it takes 2 to make a baby . If he has gone away from the mother's heart she can file for divorce and opt not to live with him . But the child is a seperate issue altogether . One must not mix the 2 issues . One must never mix the personal feelings as a wife with his rights to his child .

koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#89
šŸ˜† I can only imagine shyamala . We saw such a fake divorce demand from Archana in PR too . Of course it was for the ultimate good ...pampering the sulky step son .šŸ˜† So it was ok . It was identified as a 'tyaag' .
Tunasnah thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#90
so purvi join new office great news but cananybody tell me how is new boss i mean is he handsome šŸ˜‰ actually i dont watch pavitra rishta these days due to some problems with zee tv signals ...i depend on this forum ...so i have lots of questions to ask .so today purvi again dream arjun ...😵 now i dont like this ..for cv's arvi are still on board this will be very bad if they show ovi divorcing arjun and arjun going back to purvi.cv's should focus on other love angles of soham teju sachin love tracks why the hell tooo much focus on arvi šŸ¤” i mean "aisa kia esp hai arvi ki love story mein "...the show is stagnant not moving our beloved arvi are seprated ...so this is not theee end "sujal kashish" "angad kripa" "karan nandini"...all our favourite couple are seprated whats the big fuss abt arvi "cv's pls move on bring something fresh and new .
Edited by tayabafarooqui - 13 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".