Kool's Commentary : Sep 28 PR - Page 6

ghar se nahi sanghamitra man se

this is no comment on hitens acting he acts fab

Hiten acting is fab bcoz he's hiten, but ankita's not bcoz she is Archana??
this whole thread comments abt how archana is not looking 50 yr old...but does hiten look so...not a single grey hair, if he had option he would have wore t shirt

only thing is archana has the variety/choice to wear coz women has...and men dont have other than shirt and suit...

I have seen in many women wearing punjabi dresses, even grandmas wearing for convenience...person to person choice...

many ekta ladies have not greyed and wore backless blouses...

When manav is giving it back to savita what she has done these years...its BAD CV's how they are showing manav
if archana does wrong...its archana fault...not CV's
fair enough

Hiten's does a good job as the 'older' version of MAnav...Sushant did an absolutely fab job as the younger version too... he looked and acted as well in his character...was an absolute eye candy😆, whereas Hiten has a serious feel to his acting that suits a 55yr+ old...

A suit does makes a man look older...men in corporate world wear suits to add to 'their' look and look experienced and older (specially before big bosses of the company where yrs of experience matters😆)...especially younger looking men...Hiten is older in suits and that is why he isn't wearing a T shirt (and probably following CVs direction too, as an actor should😆)...dress and look suits him fine as an older and experienced person...

Ankita too could looked older, wearing sarees😆...sarees add an amount of maturity and years to the characters, whereas dresses makes one looks younger...especially salwars makes one look their age, whereas, sarees tends to add some years to a person..😃

Absolutely, Ankita could have wore salwars, if she could have been 50+ (or 40 yrs +, and was married with kids in real life ... then her curves could be different😆) and even a Salwar could show her 'real' age at 50 yrs...then we wouldn't be giving constructive criticism for the costume people of the show😆... 54yrs + women wearing Salwar absolutely show their age (may even one tries to hide, can they really😆😆, they show the age irrespective of the salwar😆)...no question about it...but a character of 54yr (who in real life is 27 yrs) wearing salwar only show her age to be 27 yrs...she isn't even dying her hair...so, what age is she trying to portray???...the character's age or her true age??? Then the question is, why is she so insecure or why she can't 'dress' to play her part...surely that is part of acting, right (or am I wrong😕)...we are not kids watching a show...even kids playing "mommy' dress up for the part...😆

At the end of the day, everything is Cvs fault...the actors/actresses do not direct the show...or do they?? Who knows Ankita might be filling multiple shoes these days...😆 and Ekta Mata laughing to the bank 😉

What Savita, did not giving the tickets was wrong...in fact, Savita, needn't have to do anything, these 2 are enough of destroy each other😆...but, some audience feels that she has a POV..

What MAnav, the son, is doing is wrong...in any dictionary and in any country...No son can be abusive to his mom...it simply disregards the womb that gave him birth in the first place...and one needs to be a mom to appreciate this simple fact...Manav, the dad should too, as he is the son as well as a Dad...so he was wrong from any way one look at his behavior...

Archana doing the court case cannot be justified from any POV, if anyone can, please do...am curious to see such justification😆. She (or the Cvs) never said sorry for that action of hers and Manav the hubby simply forgot her action (due to high hormones), when pre-leap, the Cvs showed serious difference of opinion...maybe, one need to try out a CC on husbands to see now "pavitar rishta' gets deeper...could love to hear personal experiences that Wifi done a wrong fraud case 😆😆 on hubby and marriage survives...just a police complaint of something against a spouse will cause a permanent 'walk out' of marriage...seen in many occasions...absolutely my POV...

You are Violating Rule Number #4 and #7

Originally posted by: FoxxyCleopatra

Why make comments in the names of the "CVs"? From what I have read so far, all of you appear to be aware of / have read through most of the other threads on this forum. However, if you have somehow avoided the information for this long, I would like to break the news that writers have nothing to do with wardrobes. I am certain all of you know that Ankita has picked (and even paid for) nearly every single outfit she has worn as Archana in the past many months. She wears exactly what she wants, from the sarees and blouses down to the jewelry and shoes.

So direct in most of your comments, why take the roundabout here? Be direct in your criticism there too.

I am perplexed by the constant need to point out how young she looks and dresses. Saying it once or twice should enough. It is not going to change because a few people on an internet forum are having issues with it.

ETA: There is no mysterious meaning behind it, either. Ankita made it clear that she wants to look and dress nice. She is tired of sarees so now she wears suits. That is all there is to it.

Originally posted by: FoxxyCleopatra

You actually happen to comment in many of those threads. Often you remark how much you dislike something or another about Ankita from a news segment or article. You also comment in this thread (or similar) about how much those other threads irritate you. Thus it is a valid assumption that you read and keep up with those news pieces. Also, your tone of voice and constant scathing remarks about her indicate your apparent knowledge on her activites.

You yourself make many assumptions about everyone and everything. Currently, you are trying to put up a front that you assumed the writers dictated the clothing, which I find incredulous because you seem to be a seasoned soap-watcher and would know that it is a different department altogether. So, do tell me, what happens when one assumes? In your case it would be that you are wrong when you assume.

I realize that if/when you reply, you will largely ignore most of my points. Instead you will write in a manner that will make you feel like you are correct. You will also make an attempt to be cheeky. Understandable. Enjoy the feeling, while it lasts. It must be great to feel correct on the internet. Accomplishment of the highest order.

Originally posted by: FoxxyCleopatra

A) The first part is your own insinuation. All that has been stated is that she wants to look and dress according to her own choices.

B) Yes, the reason for change is that she simply wanted to, after feeling exhausted by the sarees.


You all truly enjoy making a story out of anything and everything. No appreciation for simple factual matters.