Brief Update : 28th August 2012 - Page 11

My dear Jai and Naava , I am a much bigger romantic fool than both of you ...😡

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

My dear Jai and Naava , I am a much bigger romantic fool than both of you ...😡

That is why I am hating Manav so much now ...😡

🤣🤣🤣ankita and hiten saying yesterday archana manav should divorce and marry other person😆😆they also irritated and we viewers also irritated😆jai,naava,tanya all r very dedicated viewers of PR now CV should think atleast 3of u😆

Guess what guys .Just now in SBS they made fun of that last scene of Pavitra Rishta yesterday and mocked Manav of how much he loves Archana ...👏😆

Originally posted by: poas

🤣🤣🤣ankita and hiten saying yesterday archana manav should divorce and marry other person😆😆they also irritated and we viewers also irritated😆jai,naava,tanya all r very dedicated viewers of PR now CV should think atleast 3of u😆

tanya see its from PR official FB Arjun-purvi's romance is not working for TRPs ...in week 34 (20th to 24th august) pavitra rishta gets the TRP 2.6+ (laste week 2.9)...we did give lots of scene to arjun-purvi's in week 34 but those episode didn't get high TRPs, only two episode gained highest TRP in monday episode, vishnu's court case (2.8+TVR) and wednesday episode ovi demands arjun (2.9 TVR) 😆😆

i m thinking it would b nice archana comes and say good bye to ovi-teju before divorce hearing and tell them about her love for them.they willnt listen but if CV show the scene nice way that atleast her bidaii effected ovi-teju it look good

Dear Naava,

There would be any question of perjury ONLY if someone could prove, and not just claim, that the signature was not hers. How would anyone, Purvi or anyone else, do that? Archana would not say that she has not signed it, she has in fact affirmed to Manav that she has signed it, and the case is proceeding on that basis.

How could it be proved now that Archana was lying? Purvi or Sulochana or anyone else making a statement would not suffice; Archana would have to accept that she had lied. She would never do that; think of the vaada to Sachin! So any perjury charge does not arise.

Shyamala

Originally posted by: naava

Shyamala, I'm certainly not a lawyer, and perhaps you are or involved in legal things, so i believe you, but couldn't then Archana be held in contempt of court for perjury? Could they could declare a mistrial? Of course, Indian courts may be different. And especially Indian PR courts 😆

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Naava,

I agree with you about the first sentence. That is quite clear.

As for @red, please do see my post to you and Jyothi above. Once Archana fails to deny the authenticity of her signature, as she did at the first court hearing, and thus implicitly confirms that she signed it, the signature automatically becomes authentic, and no accusation of forgery can stand. Of course in PR, anything can happen.

Shyamala

Hey guys , I am having major problems logging on to this site and also some other sites .I have PMed Poppy and Naresh that if I cannot open the brief update thread on time today then if they can open it for me but I am not sure if they read the PM...

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

My dear Jai and Naava , I am a much bigger romantic fool than both of you ...😡

That is why I am hating Manav so much now ...😡

Originally posted by: naava

🤣 What to do Tanya...i think more than romantic fools we are fools to be watching this show anymore.

Everything you say about the situation yesterday is true. Divorcing your wife because you don't want her to take abuse from your mother and daughters is nuts. But then, so is divorcing your husband because one of your sons asked you to so that he could bring his real mother into the family, even though his father doesn't want her or love her, but loves you.

It isnt' that i disagree with you about what Manav is doing. It's just that i hope he will realize it and change his behaviour... Cause i think he does love Archana

Besides I thought Jai and Arjunaluis needed company 😆 (JK)