Kool's Commentary : Feb 7 PR - Page 4

WELCOME EVERYONE TO THE RECAP OF KOOLS COMMENTARY

2012!!!🤣🥳

Fantastic Post KOOLS and EVERYONE!!!!! 🤗

Sorry I have to post early, busy as a bee😆

Kools you really made me laugh today, you are one hilarious person.🤣

Comments of the day:

Guys, Guys, I have seen CVS . And I have seen FORMULA, But NEVER have I seen THESE kind of CVS who have NO FUSE in their BRAIN BULBS . Guys they don't HAVE a STORY ! They r LITERALLY showing OLD STORY again as CREATIVITY has LEFT them due to the CURSE of the viewers whom they BORED . Can Someone tell me the ADDRESS of the office where one can APPLY to be a part of the SCRIPT WRITING TEAM ? If doing NOTHING is creativity and one gets PAYMENT for that , I'm ready to apply !

The most Excellent Point of the day. Kools, you cannot be anymore right about the CVS. The funny part is that you would be doing WAY better than their nothing and their lack of talent, would be even more BLINDING. I have figured out their strategy too. They realise that they have bored us to death, so they rally back on the old story lines that they thought used to work. They save time, money and brain energy and their lack of talent is swept underneath the carpet, in this strategy. Yup, it is the same dramas of divorce, pretentious behaviour, FIL blind love, same Mandir significance of so-called love..yada'yada'yada.. What is new? Oh Savita's Bluetooth, manicures and face packs, and Albert the butler'.wee'wee..wee..

What Punni Told Saas is Sadly true of Karanjkar Women . Punni is really like Rasika if Teju is like Savita . Very Ruthless and Brainy. Punni should NOT be forced in marrying anyone as she will make the guy UNHAPPY if she is CROSSED .

Excellent Point Kools. I was thinking same thing, she is so right, as I said before, cards can't be played easily without reason. So true, I saw Rasika's Sanskaars if you want to make Grandmother comparisons, to Teju and Savita. Punni shows no mercy, and she makes well thought out plans, just like Rasika. It is only natural Karma that can make them fall, otherwise these nuts are hard to crack. I totally agree that Punni should not be forced into a marriage she does not want. Manju and Vinod should be trying to help her to change. Same type of thinking Sulo had. Instead of trying to help Archana build her self-confidence, and let her know she is worthy and a piece of paper cannot define that. Or try to find a way to send her to school first, she was forcing Rishtas upon Rishtas, with boys who were educated and deemed worthy. So both sets of parents have 'unworthy,' daughters who never tried to correct, and yet they expect 'worthy,' boys for them. Isn't that a bit hypocritical and twisted?

Hope Sulochana does not insult Manav tomorrow

Excellent Point Kools. I would love to say same, but I have no faith in Sulo as a Mother or a Woman. She has not set any example for her children, so I definitely have no great expectations of her. However, I know you are just wishing too.

Wonder what Purvi's reaction will be. I won't be surprised if Archu LIES to Purvi tomorrow . If NOT , Purvi's reaction will be interesting .

Excellent Point Kools. I am also looking forward to this drama tomorrow. I am sure Purvi will not be told the real truth. If anything is revealed, it will only be Archu's perspective of course from Sulo. Archu is only aware of her world, her truth, her perspective and her emotions about them, is only know to 'her.'

seriously dont know what the Cvs are up to with Teju and her visit to India,what had i expected from her and the visit of her to India and what have been I am seeing...

Excellent Point Umi Beta. Am I to assume that her reason for visiting India is a lie, and she is only acting out her desire to visit India, when Savita shared her stories about India? I am sure she mentioned an agent since she has been there, but does she not have practice or something till this day, and why is she not meeting with this agent or even a group? This track is seriously confusing and ridiculous.

Hope someone really gives her hell when she does something like above said...because what does she and her daughter thought, for god sake he is a 50yr old man and the Husband to her daughter and the SIL of that house(though he had never got that respect)...he is Even the owner of that House..

Excellent Point Umi Beta. I want her to regret if she insults Manav. She has no respect for the fact that her daughter is a grown woman, who should be able to make her own decisions, that Manav is the SIL of that house and the owner of the 70 lakhs worth building for crying out loud.

Sadly Manav was expressing his displeasure and frustration on the events he had gone thro because of marriage...

and whatever might be the anger or the loss or frustration he had till now ,

Excellent Point Umi Beta. Manav was surely expressing these feelings, how can we blame him? How can we blame him for thinking these Rasams are fake? Whether it is Archu, Sulo or Savita's deeds, that is how he feels, because he is the one left confused, uninformed and without a wife beside him at night.

according to latest promo court order arman to live together so where they both going to live in karanjkars house,or in dk house where arjun is living and will purvi accompany archana.PLS CV'S just finish this divorce track soon.

Excellent Point Taya. The Cvs need to end the divorce track. We know nothing will be solved in a realistic and sensible way. Archu will come out on top without repenting, Manav will look like a loser 'Mamas Boy,' who is wrong, so just hurry up with it already.😡

now i m waiting for archana scene with her daughters and how they react.And another scene i m looking forward to is sachu purvi scene as kool called IT "FUN SCENE".IT is interesting ke both sachin and purvi are adopted by arman but sachin is trying to braek arman mariage onthe other side purvi will unite them.

Excellent Point Taya. I am also looking forward to see how the twins will react to Archana, I seriously want to see. Such an interesting perspective you have put forward with Purvi and Sachu both being adopted but one is for uniting and the other is for breaking the marriage. I really like this, never looked on it that way before.👍🏼 It makes me want to look forward to their clashes even more. It would be nice if the Cvs were smart enough to show us some compelling arguments for both children desires when they are fighting.😆

Umi Archana is not fit to be the chappal in Manavs feet , honestly . Husbands r NOT like this ...They ask wife to work , to contribute to double income , raise eyebrows when Wifes Maika demands more and more or over stays , pull wife up sharply if kids r neglected , Will divorce without giving a PENNY if Wife sues for strangers .

Thats the real world for u .

Excellent Point Kools. I loved the entire Post on this. 👍🏼 Sulo believes her daughter is more worthy, but we know the lies. Archu is definitely not fit to be the chappal at Manav's feet. Kools I Knight you for saying this.👏👍🏼 Manav is a 'real man,' practically non existent in the real world, he would be what God wants in a Man. The husbands in the 'real world,' would definitely do all what you said and some worse.

Damodar's character is so weird. He really has no role or use except Archana jaap,and that doesn't even help archana. most purposeless character I've seen; and frankly, his character is perverted the way it's been portrayed so far. While his liking for archana is okay and even natural; his indifference to his own children and grandchildren is abnormal and that's what makes it perverted.

Excellent Point Sowmya. Loved your overall post. Damodar is one big drunkard joke. Where is his input in all of this, except my Bou, My Bou, you are perfect. If he really thinks that way, why did he not take the initiative and call a meeting between Manav and Archu and see how best he can play mediator, why the babies have to get involved? You are also right about him not interacting with the grandchildren. Is he so better losing Archu, that he can't even love anyone else in the house? He needs Archu around to feel love for his grandchildren? I like your words 'abnormal.'and 'perveted.' This is a very complicated love shown by Damodar.

I liked him after the court case and Soham's kidnap, not the fact that he blasted archana or that he took the children from her. But the fact that he knew what he had to do, and did it.

Excellent Point Sowmya. I agree with you so much, this is the Manav required for such situations. Strong, assertive and confident. I really hope he applies it tomorrow when Sulo tries to insult him, or anyone tries to undermine or misunderstand his actions.

Cvs have zero idea regarding girls growing up in the West..'how pathetic is their depiction of Teju so far'a girl with a fighting spirit like Teju will more often go into social studies and take up causes working with NGO etc.,

Excellent Point Kalapi. Exactly, they have no idea of how girls in the West operate. I cannot say anymore how they need to educate themselves on so many things. You are so right, a girl like Teju join organizations to utilize their curiosity and thirst for alternative causes. The Cvs most certainly showed no respect for the education system in Canada, by how they have misused Teju's 'Spirit,' in an unnecessary and stupid way. Kalapi, you made a Fantastic Point, I applaud you for this...very deep. 👏

My Comments of the day:

So, we have entered the Chambers of Ekta's🤡 FULL BLOWN. We are now seeing recycled flashbacks, mandir's symbolism of love and destiny between Arman, senseless divorces, and pains of the Saint only God alone can figure. There must be a lot of cobwebs where Ekta keeps those old scripts.🤡 We are surely saw some today. 😆

Purvi's eagerness for a Baba can be considered sad, understandable, and touching, but for the life of me, I feel annoyed in some aspects. Am I that cruel, to say that everything she does, is annoying? Yesterday, I thought she was OTT, I cringed when she prematurely said Baba and Dada, but I let it slide a bit, I think🤔 Anyways, today I had to be real with myself, it is not healthy to bottle things up. This display of gladness for Baba, who never signed adoption papers is too OTT for me. 😒I wish I never felt this way, because I really should feel more sorry for her, yes I do a little but not enough for me not to be so annoyed. I wonder if it is because first impressions last for the most part with me.🤔Gosh.

I think I am over the Bollywood scenes which Ekta tries to hard to mimick, and fail miserably. I hope I am not wrong for saying this, but why use the Mandir for a love that is not PR to us, or is it a matter of perception?She could have used the steps of somewhere else. If I was deeply religious, I may forget this is a show and be😡 Anyways, I don't want to stir anything.

Today I talk about Manav and Savita.

Manav, I believe is a 'real man.' From the beginning Manav was shown sheltering an already drenched Archana with his umbrella in the rain, do you remember? What does this really signify? Was this the beginning of a relationship that no matter what this man will always live for this woman? Isn't that a 'real man?' He was soon caught up in a web of deceit starring his Mother, that he was an engineer, instead of a mere mechanic. He received slaps upon insults from Archana's family and also insults directed at the rest of his family. He acquired so many enemies due to this Rishta, that he even lost his brother. How did Manav deal with all of that? That's right, like a 'real man.' He tried to show his real intentions of love for Archana and is doing so till this very day.

Manav never sided with his Mother's wrong doings, he always defended Archana. It was Archana who always insisted on taking his Mother's taunts a lot of the times, without Manav's knowledge. Manav was constantly torn between his love for his Mother and Wife. What did he do in those occasions? He cut in many times, and stopped his Mother from continuing her taunts/abuse. The other times, Archana took it silently, never telling Manav. Manav is a 'real man.' The most profound action of his love for Archana, was when he fully realised Savita would not accept Archana, and he took her and moved out. What did Archu do? She did everything to get them back under the same roof, because he was very sad being away from his Mother. Manav worked with it, because Savita became good at this point. This is a 'real man.'

When Manav lost his son, because he was poor and had no one to help him to save his son. What did Manav do after this experience? He left home to become a 'better man,' is that not a 'real man?' Manav worked hard to become a success, and he wanted the people he grew up with share in this success. Now who is the 'real man?' Manav fought for the rights of the chawl people even with his boss DK, remember the whole mess with the other company that wanted to make the people homeless and not get a red cent? Who pleaded with DK, to change all of that, so he can help his own chawl people? Yes it is the 'real man,' Manav.

When Manav's own wife, sided with Chawl people and indirectly made Dharmesh and Ajit have victory, who besides his pain, loss of reputation and confusion, sent plane ticket to his Mother, for this same wife to accompany him to Canada? The 'real man,' Manav. What about sweet Soham, innocent of the impulsive behaviour of a Mother who gave him to her sister from birth, to make her 'happy,' who cares about Daddy's 'happiness,' he does not have a womb. Sister is right, husband is wrong, child now lost or dead, Baba still sent plane ticket, to move ahead. Isn't he a 'real man?' What would the opposite man do?'

Eighteen years, no call, no queries, SIL still in India, go figure. Manav in a world, of belief that he is a single Dad, hugging the pain of court case, dead or lost children, estranged wife, but he still hugs the kids putting them to bed. Mother gets to live the good life, she never had. Even a lawyer came out of all of this. What a man, what a 'real man.'

Eighteen years later. Destiny pulls him to his death, but he only sees life, with the same wife, what strife. He is giving away half, keeping on worthless staff, playing knight in shining armouron Mandir steps, tears fall in his heart it wets. Yet he is the one to blame, what a shame. He is indeed a 'real man.'

Savita, I believe is a woman that possesses Normal Motherly instincts for the most part, even if her actions may be deemed wrong. Savita did want a wife for her son, she shared the same concern for his worth just like Sulo. They both felt their children were lacking. Savita felt Manav was not rich enough and Sulo felt Archu was not educated enough, aren't they driven by the same insecurities? Savita lied, Sulo forced rich Rishtas, in spite of her concerns. One is extreme, one is passive aggressive, but both are 'ambitious.' Archu sees this of Savita and Manav, but ignores with her Aai. Maybe it is normal to be biased, but when one lives in a glass house, he/she must never throw stones.

Yes, Savita is driven by greed and jealousy a lot of times. However, what about the times, when her greed created 18 yrs of uninterrupted success for her son? What about the times when she felt her son was wronged by the Ks, with slaps and insults? What about the time when she was mad at her son's money going to the Ks, saving them from their own wrong actions, 70 lakhs worth? How many lakhs was she wrong, when for 18yrs benefactor, insults and mocks while laying in it? What at about the time, when Sachin died? What about the time when she and her family were beaten in prison, due to a K? Why wasn't Dharmesh beaten for bigamy, or a K would not benefit? Why wasn't Archu beaten for suing her own husband and his Boss? What about the time when the Ks SIL misbehaved with her daughter, forcing her to marry a wife beater and live with a hateful MIL? Disclaimer: I am not condoning beating of any character, especially the ladies, just showing hypothetics.

Yes, her treatment of Archana when she stepped into her Sasural was wrong, but what was it motivated by? Wasn't Manav also insulted and slapped by the same wife's mother? Can we really judge her? What would you do in such situations? Should we judge one or both MILs, the mainly passive-aggressive Sulo or the more straightforward Savita? Isn't this two of the same evil? If there is to be forgiveness wouldn't they share equal rights? Isn't a lie a lie, not matter the degree?

Savita have displayed that she can be good, when she does not feel threatened. Insecurity is a hell of a thing, it can make you do crazy things, but was all Savita's insecurities unjustified? Mother moves in no problem, but then DIL, can't balance. Dil spends the whole time catering to Mother, children being neglected, rightful duties of Mother towards children is even being shared by Mother, so where does Savita fit in? Personally I would ignore, because I am not insecure, nor have I experienced. Who to judge? How to know what I would really do? Was she really wrong about Sachu being ignored? Then how could she have played that card? At times, one may get blamed for things and no one believes, they see no signs'.Nah..but what about the times when it is obvious to the regular eye? Constant issues with Mother's problems, sisters constant Sasural issues, spending 9mths or so in court fighting against husband, while pregnant, when does one really get the time to raise a children with the full attention he/she needs? Love is there we believe, but is nursing cuts from falls or burns and making meals, all about parenting? How do we not see from early the questioning eyes and doubts from our little ones? Are we really paying attention are we really parenting? How does the child of another get in the hands of a sister who aborted her own for freedom, then sees other sister pregnant and suddenly has instincts? What was the motivation of her instincts, did Archu care to know? I guess not. Do we really want to be Savita? Does she deserve hate or pity for her methodology?

Reinforcement By Kalapi:

the Cvs are getting on my last nerve by talking about the so called 'Pavitra rishta''please can they clarify what is so 'Pavitra' in this 'rishta''nothing just staying married in name only equates to NOTHING'.rishtas are only pavitra (be it of mom/kid, hubby/wife, brother/sister), when these are maintained to its truest meaning, with compassion, respect, trust, and humility'.and in Arman's rishta nothing is there'.

Jokes of the day:

Kools reporting from base : ARMAN do Goo Goo Gaa Gaa in PR

Kools'.funny as hell'.wee..🤣🤣

full of feminist women going in for divorces like no one's business . She convinced the SAAS that they divorce even if they don't like the color of their HUBBY"S HANKY . Or if Hubby forgets to KISS them GOODBYE while rushing to office . She then SLYLY congratulated the SAAS for her HIMMAT in agreeing to marry Prashant to such a KHANDAAN .Saas Looked PERTURBED

Wee'..Kools'.this was is too funny'..🤣🤣

Saint Archana listened , disturbed . She of course FORGAVE Sad Manav for his bitterness . Instantly . Its all because he PINES for me , she thought . Its his DESPERATION speaking , not his soul . What he does not know is the divorces are ONLY ON PAPER . From INSIDE I am STILL MARRIED TO HIM . THAT he doesn't know and hence this bitterness , in ignorance ! His IGNORANCE has to be forgiven . Suffering shall eventually bring about his self realization . Saint Archana wondered if she should put a laddoo in Sad Manav's bitter mouth . She decided AGAINST it as the TOUGH WAY is the BEST .

Kools, I did not know whether to laugh or cry''.but laughing got the best of me'.wee'..🤣🤣

But you CAN"T divorce ! cried Damo . TUM EK DOOSRE KA DAMAN NAHI CHOD SAKTE ! Put Archana ON ! I need to TALK ! You both are MADE FOR EACH OTHER ! The CONSTANT PAIN is a mere camoflauge for LOVE ! Its actually LOVE ! Besides , WHAT about the fuure of CANADIANS ? And Me ? I'm tired of seeing Savita's FACE and eating ALBERT's cooking !

Kools'this one I can't stop laughing about'.I had your vision and I almost wet myself'.wee'..this is extremely funny''weee🥳🤣🤣

Ovi-Arjun

Purvi-Sachu

Archu-TDH

Wah wah wah...

Archu & Purvi both can now bow down to Manav and take the blessings

Varsha Homie...good one...weee...🤣🤣

Disclaimer: For All to enjoy!!! If I Quote anyone wrong, Sorry. If I did not Quote you, Sorry. PLEASE VIEWERS AND THOSE CLICKING THE LIKE BUTTON, IN KOOLS COMMENTARY, WE WOULD LOVE TO HEAR YOUR OPINIONS, PLEASE JOIN US IN LETTING THE CVS KNOW OUR OPINIONS.

Originally posted by: umayal

Kool Di, Varsha di, Kalapi di, Hilly di, Sowmya, Taya and all,,

Good Night from my side...
Going to sleep now...

see you all tomorrow...😊

Today I talk about Manav and Savita.

Manav, I believe is a 'real man.' From the beginning Manav was shown sheltering an already drenched Archana with his umbrella in the rain, do you remember? What does this really signify? Was this the beginning of a relationship that no matter what this man will always live for this woman? Isn't that a 'real man?' He was soon caught up in a web of deceit starring his Mother, that he was an engineer, instead of a mere mechanic. He received slaps upon insults from Archana's family and also insults directed at the rest of his family. He acquired so many enemies due to this Rishta, that he even lost his brother. How did Manav deal with all of that? That's right, like a 'real man.' He tried to show his real intentions of love for Archana and is doing so till this very day.

Manav never sided with his Mother's wrong doings, he always defended Archana. It was Archana who always insisted on taking his Mother's taunts a lot of the times, without Manav's knowledge. Manav was constantly torn between his love for his Mother and Wife. What did he do in those occasions? He cut in many times, and stopped his Mother from continuing her taunts/abuse. The other times, Archana took it silently, never telling Manav. Manav is a 'real man.' The most profound action of his love for Archana, was when he fully realised Savita would not accept Archana, and he took her and moved out. What did Archu do? She did everything to get them back under the same roof, because he was very sad being away from his Mother. Manav worked with it, because Savita became good at this point. This is a 'real man.'

When Manav lost his son, because he was poor and had no one to help him to save his son. What did Manav do after this experience? He left home to become a 'better man,' is that not a 'real man?' Manav worked hard to become a success, and he wanted the people he grew up with share in this success. Now who is the 'real man?' Manav fought for the rights of the chawl people even with his boss DK, remember the whole mess with the other company that wanted to make the people homeless and not get a red cent? Who pleaded with DK, to change all of that, so he can help his own chawl people? Yes it is the 'real man,' Manav.

When Manav's own wife, sided with Chawl people and indirectly made Dharmesh and Ajit have victory, who besides his pain, loss of reputation and confusion, sent plane ticket to his Mother, for this same wife to accompany him to Canada? The 'real man,' Manav. What about sweet Soham, innocent of the impulsive behaviour of a Mother who gave him to her sister from birth, to make her 'happy,' who cares about Daddy's 'happiness,' he does not have a womb. Sister is right, husband is wrong, child now lost or dead, Baba still sent plane ticket, to move ahead. Isn't he a 'real man?' What would the opposite man do?'

Eighteen years, no call, no queries, SIL still in India, go figure. Manav in a world, of belief that he is a single Dad, hugging the pain of court case, dead or lost children, estranged wife, but he still hugs the kids putting them to bed. Mother gets to live the good life, she never had. Even a lawyer came out of all of this. What a man, what a 'real man.'

Eighteen years later. Destiny pulls him to his death, but he only sees life, with the same wife, what strife. He is giving away half, keeping on worthless staff, playing knight in shining armouron Mandir steps, tears fall in his heart it wets. Yet he is the one to blame, what a shame. He is indeed a 'real man.'

Savita, I believe is a woman that possesses Normal Motherly instincts for the most part, even if her actions may be deemed wrong. Savita did want a wife for her son, she shared the same concern for his worth just like Sulo. They both felt their children were lacking. Savita felt Manav was not rich enough and Sulo felt Archu was not educated enough, aren't they driven by the same insecurities? Savita lied, Sulo forced rich Rishtas, in spite of her concerns. One is extreme, one is passive aggressive, but both are 'ambitious.' Archu sees this of Savita and Manav, but ignores with her Aai. Maybe it is normal to be biased, but when one lives in a glass house, he/she must never throw stones.

Yes, Savita is driven by greed and jealousy a lot of times. However, what about the times, when her greed created 18 yrs of uninterrupted success for her son? What about the times when she felt her son was wronged by the Ks, with slaps and insults? What about the time when she was mad at her son's money going to the Ks, saving them from their own wrong actions, 70 lakhs worth? How many lakhs was she wrong, when for 18yrs benefactor, insults and mocks while laying in it? What at about the time, when Sachin died? What about the time when she and her family were beaten in prison, due to a K? Why wasn't Dharmesh beaten for bigamy, or a K would not benefit? Why wasn't Archu beaten for suing her own husband and his Boss? What about the time when the Ks SIL misbehaved with her daughter, forcing her to marry a wife beater and live with a hateful MIL? Disclaimer: I am not condoning beating of any character, especially the ladies, just showing hypothetics.

Yes, her treatment of Archana when she stepped into her Sasural was wrong, but what was it motivated by? Wasn't Manav also insulted and slapped by the same wife's mother? Can we really judge her? What would you do in such situations? Should we judge one or both MILs, the mainly passive-aggressive Sulo or the more straightforward Savita? Isn't this two of the same evil? If there is to be forgiveness wouldn't they share equal rights? Isn't a lie a lie, not matter the degree?

Savita have displayed that she can be good, when she does not feel threatened. Insecurity is a hell of a thing, it can make you do crazy things, but was all Savita's insecurities unjustified? Mother moves in no problem, but then DIL, can't balance. Dil spends the whole time catering to Mother, children being neglected, rightful duties of Mother towards children is even being shared by Mother, so where does Savita fit in? Personally I would ignore, because I am not insecure, nor have I experienced. Who to judge? How to know what I would really do? Was she really wrong about Sachu being ignored? Then how could she have played that card? At times, one may get blamed for things and no one believes, they see no signs'.Nah..but what about the times when it is obvious to the regular eye? Constant issues with Mother's problems, sisters constant Sasural issues, spending 9mths or so in court fighting against husband, while pregnant, when does one really get the time to raise a children with the full attention he/she needs? Love is there we believe, but is nursing cuts from falls or burns and making meals, all about parenting? How do we not see from early the questioning eyes and doubts from our little ones? Are we really paying attention are we really parenting? How does the child of another get in the hands of a sister who aborted her own for freedom, then sees other sister pregnant and suddenly has instincts? What was the motivation of her instincts, did Archu care to know? I guess not. Do we really want to be Savita? Does she deserve hate or pity for her methodology?

Superb compilation hilly and a 🤗 and many thanks

Loved ur analysis on Manav and Savita , Ur too good at this like sowmya

The best line thst summed Savita up was that she is better when she is not threatened

Originally posted by: umayal

Hi Umi, I'm well. How are you? I'm coming in to post when I can, but I read most of the posts here and agree with all of it. Very well written too! LOL...Jaywant coming back would actually be good probably. I can just imagine it, Ovi-Arjun and Archu-jaywant getting engaged at the same party and both ovi and archu taking manav's blessings 😆😆

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

nyway, I forgot to mention in yesterday's post that the Cvs are getting on my last nerve by talking about the so called 'Pavitra rishta''please can they clarify what is so 'Pavitra' in this 'rishta''nothing just staying married in name only equates to NOTHING'.rishtas are only pavitra (be it of mom/kid, hubby/wife, brother/sister), when these are maintained to its truest meaning, with compassion, respect, trust, and humility'.and in Arman's rishta nothing is there'.

Kalapi and the Nothing amounts to literally nothing . They never had a marraige in real sense where they raised kids together ...Soham was raised by Varsha , Sachu was half the time with Savita , and Ovi Teju just did not have a mother in their life due to Archana 's decision of simply giving them up . They never worked together to raise income , make savings , nothing ! All they have are some romance memories and some teeny bopper ideas , bas ...that what we have is a Pavitra Rishta blah blah ...even slum people have better marraiges , REAL ones

Hilly ,ur compilation on Manav and Savita was superb 👍🏼… too good darling🤗...u should have made it as an independent post for all to see…I just loved it…too good👍🏼….

Originally posted by: sowmya_jairam

I know right 😲 It may actually happen though. Age doesn't seem to have done a thing for these two; they 're still eyelock-ing and playing marriage-divorce. Doesn't seem so odd that jaywant comes back more handsome and passionate than ever and convert sad manav into bad, angry manav and foolish archana into still foolish, but abla nari-ish archana. I would so love to see that 😍

@ Varsha, we were discussing the possibility of Jaywant coming back now that PR is doing a repeat telecast with the same characters and new extras. Hope Satish and Dharmu😍 come back too; we need more hot men in this show. And Manav, DK, jaywant, satish, dharmu and arjun can form a boys club and hang out and discuss their (sometimes common) women 😆