Kool's Commentary : Feb 14 PR - Page 2

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

sherma the full family was in jail together ...........how can manav leave them and dance with the family that put them there once ?

[/QUOTEexactly my point.i will never forgive any one i mean anyone who raise hands on my parents,a fact is dis it happened cause of k fly.i am not saying dont forgive dem but dont forget it.savita was alwys dere for mnav,evne in d hardest time(jail) she was not ready to let go off manav unlike damodar whowas happy tat his son in jail. its rther sad seeing manav like dis.

Originally posted by: umayal

Yes Di,To Admit even I am finding it Odd.
When she Doesn't Greet Ajit and started talking with vaishu about Grocery list and then Leaving to her Maayka the second time,I was Like,oh this is not so Archu or the one I have seen earlier,the lovable,innocent well mannered girl.

Then even today she just left.How about asking Sachu.
Why ARMAN's part with Sachu is totally forgotten.I think CV's as totally forgotten that a character called sachu exists,Even with Damo-Sav sachu is not there.


For me,they are Butchering Her character after post marriage(not exactly post marriage,to be frank,
after JDJ is what I feel).Her Importance and Lovable nature as lost.

The character archu who I had fallen in Love with is losing its charm.
Just Because of Ankita,I am seeing archu these days.

Originally posted by: sowmya_jairam

Hi all,
@Koolsadhu. I visit PR forum to read your commentary daily and feel that it is one of few analytical posts devoid of blind fanaticism. I have not watched a single episode of PR to date, and I have no plans of watching one. But I love reading your commentary, so please continue your daily posts.My dear am extremely flattered that someone reads my commentary without seeing the soap .😊 THANK YOU .

Coming to PR itself, I havent watched the episodes and all of it is what I understand from the commentary and written updates, so correct me if I am wrong but my biggest gripe is about Dharmesh. His was such a real character, not conventionally handsome or hero material, but having a commanding presence and immense self-confidence. That was probably the reason a conventionally beautiful girl like Vaishali fell for him. And the character is so real- he is a practical, no-nonsense business man who has his principles, morally right or wrong, firmly in place; but also good with his relationships. Obviously, real and even powerful businessmen are not all good-looking or even good. The character sketch seemed to have taken a sudden turn when the creatives decided to make him a manipulative bigamist, making him a villain from an anti-hero. My question is this-Excellent description of Dharmesh .

Why should anybody who is/was against the leads be taught a lesson? i too dont get it Sowmya. Not just that ........the way to do it is by making the ones who cross the leads POOR . Where does this happen in real life ? For instance now they will show Dharmu losing his money and becoming a bhikaari . WHY ? Why shud everyones MONEY be taken away ? Cudnt Ajit come to his senses remaining rich only ? Cannot Dharmu realise his mistake staying rich ?Cannot Manav become rich and his equal WITHOUT Dharmu losing his money ?😕😕😕😕

Why should anybody who questions the leads be the villains so that the leads can say that their detractors are just evil?Aptly put .

Why should the leads always be right? And why should they be right by making others wrong? And why should other characters have bigger and bigger flaws so that the lead's flaws is overshadowed?Coz the leads r PATHETIC . They have nO scope of rising unless others r diminished is hwat CVS think .

The characters in PR and in general, Hindi serials are so one-dimensional and stereotypical, and nothing I haven't seen in a hundred serials before; and frankly, I find them boring. This guy, Dharmesh was a non-stereotypical, non-conventional, multi-dimensional character; and they butchered him just to show that anybody who fights the leads are intrinsically wrong. His cutting salaries of workers maybe cruel, but is understable particularly in times of recession. Even blaming an innocent man who pissed him off for a crime he did not commit could be explained due to his innate business sense and need to protect his own hide. And he cannot be blamed for trying to separate the leads when her own family did not support them-it can be explained that he was trying to protect his SIL. But with the bigamy and the purposeful mainpulations, the character went too far. And I think I will miss this character the most in PR.That is exactly the way I defended Dharmesh in my commentary ............I had NOT sided with Archu for slapping him , I had found it uncalled for and not appropriate considering her relation with him .I stopped defending him when he was shown a blatant BIGAMIST . I COULDN"T defend him anymore then , the CVS just butchered him ! A real character , a realistic marraige.Dharmu Vaishu was razed to the ground by CVS . What is there to defend now? The next step , without telling is making him POOR . And thats why I asked which IDIOT is writing this script .

Originally posted by: pallai

kools nice commentary.. i was shocked when i read in WU that manav said sulo u stood by me when no one believed me i was like when??? wen he went to jail sulo didnt fight for him....even the robbery accusation was not cleared properly and he says u stood by me?!!!

i think manav is sucking up sooo much .. its like he himself wants their approval or something..!

also i didnt quite get the point that manav expects his expenditure to be covered as loss to the business? so ajit and shibu share h expenses? i have a feeling this business is gonna cause some major rift between manav and ajit... though i hope not....

i agree with u that archana has turned cold after marriage its like she does wat she wants not wat is right...

Originally posted by: sowmya_jairam

This guy, Dharmesh was a non-stereotypical, non-conventional, multi-dimensional character; and they butchered him just to show that anybody who fights the leads are intrinsically wrong. His cutting salaries of workers maybe cruel, but is understable particularly in times of recession. Even blaming an innocent man who pissed him off for a crime he did not commit could be explained due to his innate business sense and need to protect his own hide. And he cannot be blamed for trying to separate the leads when her own family did not support them-it can be explained that he was trying to protect his SIL. But with the bigamy and the purposeful mainpulations, the character went too far. And I think I will miss this character the most in PR.