Originally posted by: eroticlover
đ I don't understand why that mother-in-law was so adamant on having a grandchild. Varsha did not want the child. This world is modern now and women want to work. So, what if Varsha did not want the baby? She stood up for herself and I commend her for not staying with that wicked mother-in-law. Come on, Varsha, make your career đđđ
actually,i do agree..pls dont bash me for this! personally,i love varsha s character from the start..the highpoint would be her stand against rasika (tht part was her best )..ok ok..coming back to present, the fact is varsha didnt want the child ,rite? why is it so wrong for her not to want a child? not all woman are dying to become mother..varsha is one of them..yes,thy didnt practice control and all..ever thought about the child s future with a mother who never wanted it first of all?would it be good for the child?and they say talk it out first with the hubby and all,but then,would the hubby ever consent to her decision if she did?i doubt not..thy would have fought again and probably she would have had to bear the taunt from her in laws..she didnt want it..what else can she do? she s the one carrying it,na? i know everyone will bash me for this,just felt like saying this,thats all!and i dont agree with archana bashing for bringing varsha home,either..she s her sister,what else can she do?someone has to bring her home no matter what...archu did her duty ..she s trying to save her sis,thts all.would the parents have forgiven themselves if varsha had committed suiceide or wtv bad prior to their decision not to take her back?...anyway,just commenting..no offence..thts a personal point of view..