Siddhi's Questionable Status and Seema's Response.

I don't think Seema was wrong saying what she said to Siddhi given the circumstances that Siddhi claimed to be leaving Kunal for money and higher status 9 years ago and 9 years alter she does appear to be very rich and powerful😉

Originally posted by: -Rani

I don't think Seema was wrong saying what she said to Siddhi given the circumstances that Siddhi claimed to be leaving Kunal for money and higher status 9 years ago and 9 years alter she does appear to be very rich and powerful😉

So basically what Siddhi told Chopras and Kunal made it look true as well by living with Diwans, changing her look (BTW, why was her look in the party vampish?) to be very unlike her and holding a powerful position in a big firm.

Seeing what Siddhi said actually coming true, Seema wasn't wrong with her views about Siddhi at all.

i agree too...9 yrs ago she portrayed that she choose money over her husband n 9 yrs later the chopra family spot her all revamped with a rich man who was nower in the picture earlier,...cnt blame them for thinking that she ditched them for money n a better life.

i am too tired to discuss abt this matter...i went deaf when this scene was happening...infact i went deaf when the whole episode was happening...was not interested in watching circus act...

i dont have a problem with the family thinking she has ditched them for money ..sure anyone in their place would have thought so ..
My problem is they have conveniently forgotten everything that she has done for them prior to this particular deed of hers ..ok even if they think she has committed a crime by giving importance to money than to relations, but at one point of time she has given the relationship so much importance hat she married a man she hated to save the person's life who is talking non sense about her .. she has put her career , her life at stake to save her husband from going to jail..
she fought with her husband , to save the lady's life who is calling her manhoos now..
all this easily swept under the carpet because she has power , name and fame now ..

and the most important thing I dont understand is ..
how can some one being bad makes other person good..
hating Sidhi doesn't justify them loving the creature ..

Originally posted by: d.padmini

i dont have a problem with the family thinking she has ditched them for money ..sure anyone in their place would have thought so ..
My problem is they have conveniently forgotten everything that she has done for them prior to this particular deed of hers ..ok even if they think she has committed a crime by giving importance to money than to relations, but at one point of time she has given the relationship so much importance hat she married a man she hated to save the person's life who is talking non sense about her .. she has put her career , her life at stake to save her husband from going to jail..
she fought with her husband , to save the lady's life who is calling her manhoos now..
all this easily swept under the carpet because she has power , name and fame now ..

and the most important thing I dont understand is ..
how can some one being bad makes other person good..
hating Sidhi doesn't justify them loving the creature ..

Rani .. from Seema's POV, what she is thinking is right but there was no need for her to be so harsh and rude to Sidhi ..to call her the worst lady in the world etc was way too much ..
and again even if they think she ditched them for money she has not committed a crime ..practically speaking ...she was 22 years when she was burdened with all responsibilities of the family to add to the husband's psyco girlfriend and a mother in law ..how long can anyone take all that and if they can forgive and forget what creature has done to them then why cant they forgive Sidhi ..??

Originally posted by: d.padmini

Rani .. from Seema's POV, what she is thinking is right but there was no need for her to be so harsh and rude to Sidhi ..to call her the worst lady in the world etc was way too much ..
and again even if they think she ditched them for money she has not committed a crime ..practically speaking ...she was 22 years when she was burdened with all responsibilities of the family to add to the husband's psyco girlfriend and a mother in law ..how long can anyone take all that and if they can forgive and forget what creature has done to them then why cant they forgive Sidhi ..??

Originally posted by: d.padmini

Rani .. from Seema's POV, what she is thinking is right but there was no need for her to be so harsh and rude to Sidhi ..to call her the worst lady in the world etc was way too much ..
and again even if they think she ditched them for money she has not committed a crime ..practically speaking ...she was 22 years when she was burdened with all responsibilities of the family to add to the husband's psyco girlfriend and a mother in law ..how long can anyone take all that and if they can forgive and forget what creature has done to them then why cant they forgive Sidhi ..??

i agree with your point but i still feel she was harsh and rude with sidhi ...at least for the relation they have shared she could have given benefit of doubt to Sidhi ..