jay_bpm thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
Yesterday's episode on its own didn't have much to say about. Siddhi-Seema conversation was best & Kunal's dream part seem good. Would've liked it if constable didn't wake him but he himself woke as seen during kidnapping. To me it would have better effect forcing Kunal to evaluate what the hell has happened?

Now episode & pre-cap did give me an idea how things can move. It us likely Siddhi will come to know about Vikram's involvement in case & she may choose to confront him or not. I hope she finds that chain somewhere related Rohit case material, so it can hold some value. Now Siddhi sure wants to save Kunal but by compromising Vikram? Second thing Thakral paid SG for his testimony & to leave town. What I think Siddhi can do:

Kunal was convicted based on 2 things. SG testimony that Kunal pushed Rohit & motive established thanks to Dumbo. So she needs to attack both as Rohit's truth is not out yet. First Siddhi can go look for SG & find out he quit his job. Upon more inquiry she finds out he actually left town & his neighbors believe he had come to acquire large sum of cash as SG was behaving & talking ad he has become big man now. It is likely of people in SG's situation to Blabber such things in front of others.

So at the hearing Siddhi can once again ask to evaluate motive & action. Well Raveena issue sure provides motive but Kunal wasn't the only person involved there. Raveena's husband, father, FIL & many more were angry at Rohit for harassing Raveena. Vikram is the person who was directly involved with Rohit & had dispute over business as well. Kunal wasn't aware of thus till few hours before the accident. So there are many more people who would want Rohit dead. She can say if they found Vikram's chain near by is he the culprit given their history? Just use Vikram as an example and not incriminate him as the culprit.

Second thing is action. Well can court really rely on SG testimony? First he came & said he saw someone fight with Rohit & later changed it to seeing Kunal there. She would once again like to cross examine him and make sure what is his final testimony. But when she inquired about him, he quit his job & also left town in less than a week. Also there is some indication that he came to acquire large sum if cash. Present a witness which may say how SG behaved and indicated that. The money Kunal supposedly gave him was present ad evidence in court so wonder where he got this money from? As saying last sentence she can look at Thakral. It would definitely make Thakral angry and he may say you ate accusing me of fault practice. There Siddhi can raise last case. In front of sane judge, same lawyer had presented an eye witness saying Kunal commuted the crime & paid money to stay quite. Well if it wasn't true then, how can court be sure Dane thing is not happening here? Then Rohit is the one who came along and testified against his sister & father.

So being Rohit's past he had trouble with many. Even with Raveena, mire than Kunal were angry on him. She herself had given him warnings & that's why Thakral first charged her. But now he jumped to Kunal, wonder why is that? Because conveniently before Thakral had presented motive and action for Siddhi as well. Also given how SG changed his testimony, his current status & fact SG confessed he was drinking while witnessing a fight; how valid his testimony should be considered?
Given reasonable doubt on motive & action; court should delay the judgment and give Kunal conditional bail with someone acting as legal guardian till next hearing.

So what do you guys think?
Edited by jay_bpm - 13 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

1k

Users

6

Likes

15

Frequent Posters

norzar thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
hi

jay i think its possible for siddhi to get kunal bail with the help of vik statement, he wanted to tell kunal the truth so maybe he wants to tell reg him having a fight with rohit that night.

i do have doubts on vik's dad, but then i feel vik will come into the picture now bec i feel the have altered the track a little, bec in e24 seg vik was there when kunal wnt to jail, but in the episode his clip was edited out and they showed him out of town. they has to be some purpose to it

i feel siddhi will confront vik on mon maybe and then he will tell her

i dont think siddhi will want vik to go to jail and raveena too may be shown against siddhi

norzar
jay_bpm thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3
Oops forgot to add one more thing where we can see both gold medal and nari-shakti.

The scenario I described requires amazing rhetoric brilliance as Vikram's name is to be used not imply him as culprit. If it was Kunal; he can do it, but for Siddhi is little hard. So Siddhi can be shown asking Kunal for guidance telling him what she has come to now. They both can cook up this plan together. Kunal can instruct Siddhi on how she can effectively throw Thakral off by raising specific arguments conveyed is specific manner. Later Siddhi can bring out wife in her and argue with woman power that can overshadow all. 😉

Now Rohit bring alive; I've said earlier how I see it could play:
Rohit can go to a disco with thought of celebrating his win over SINAL and how he used his delusional sister in the process. Lollypop can visit same disco as that's the only thing I hear she does. Gaurav can come looking for her as for a change now he has to act mature😆.
Here he spots Rohit and forces himself to go help SINAL. I had liked Gaurva character and he needs something substantial to reestablish his credibility.

myra_3490 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
Kunal cannot get bail nw as the court is convinced that kunal is guilty n the court has given the date to decide and pronounce his judgement...acc to law when the court is convinced abt the guilt and the accused is sent to judicial custody then.it lies entirely in the hands of the court to convict him or acquit him n he cannot aplly for bail...nw if vikram gives his statement in the court then kunal will be acquitted and freed from all the charges...i hope sidhi makes vikram give his statement in the court then kunal will be freed...n then vikram would be charged bt as rohit is alive if sinal bring out this truth in front of the court then vikram will also be freed
jay_bpm thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: myra_islam

Kunal cannot get bail nw as the court is convinced that kunal is guilty n the court has given the date to decide and pronounce his judgement...acc to law when the court is convinced abt the guilt and the accused is sent to judicial custody then.it lies entirely in the hands of the court to convict him or acquit him n he cannot aplly for bail...nw if vikram gives his statement in the court then kunal will be acquitted and freed from all the charges...i hope sidhi makes vikram give his statement in the court then kunal will be freed...n then vikram would be charged bt as rohit is alive if sinal bring out this truth in front of the court then vikram will also be freed


Well I am not in law directly but so can't speak for sure. But some of my family members are lawyers. Of course on the face Kunal will not get bail.
But if Siddhi is able to show there is reasonable doubt that Kunal may not be the culprit, wouldn't that force court to hold decision for some time? The judge said if Siddhi can provide any evidence, do they have to be of his innocence directly or can they be such to raise doubt on prosecution's evidence?
chitsss thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: jay_bpm


Well I am not in law directly but so can't speak for sure. But some of my family members are lawyers. Of course on the face Kunal will not get bail.
But if Siddhi is able to show there is reasonable doubt that Kunal may not be the culprit, wouldn't that force court to hold decision for some time? The judge said if Siddhi can provide any evidence, do they have to be of his innocence directly or can they be such to raise doubt on prosecution's evidence?

Jay myra_islam is a lawyer in the making😃 I think what she is saying is that in the previous hearing the court pronounced Kunal guilty but adjourned the case for another date to just decide on what punishment to give him.So if in this hearing Siddhi can provide proof that establishes he is innocent then he will be acquitted of murder charges.He cannot appeal for bail under such circumstances.
jay_bpm thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: chitsss


Yes I do know that myra-islam is a lawyer in process and I was hoping to hear from her in this matter. I know Kunal can't just get bail as it is. My question is now would Siddhi must provide proof to prove innocent, that would be end of case and I don't trust CVs for that. So what I wonder was can Siddhi raise strong doubt on validity of presented evidences? If so would that have any effect on the status of the case or not? Or given the current situation; now it has to be last hearing where Siddhi must prove Kunal innocent?
I know there exist legal loopholes that had allowed few people in India to get bail during the time Kunal rests in custody. But that and even sentencing is depended on many factors such as first crime, confession or not, circumstances of crime, etc.

Shehnaz.K thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8
Parichay creatives have no idea of law system.N the way they r showing a JKR siddhi doing all detective wrk n kunal guiding her in dreams n people around her saying she will win,she will win means it wil b nari shakti all the way unless trp z fall as creatives only understand these numbers.
Edited by Shehnaz.K - 13 years ago
chitsss thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9
Vik's confession+evidences that raise doubts on the Rohit's death can probably convince the judge to withdraw his judgement that Kunal is guilty at the same time Thakral can argue conspiracy and get the judge to give him time to prove it.That way the case won't end but Kunal won't be considered guilty anymore right!!
Edited by chitsss - 13 years ago
jay_bpm thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: chitsss

Vik's confession+evidences that raise doubts on the Rohit's death can probably convince the judge to withdraw his judgement that Kunal is guilty at the same time Thakral can argue conspiracy and get the judge to give him time to prove it.That way the case won't end but Kunal won't be considered guilty anymore right!!


Of course that is the hope. But tricky situation is would SINAL allow Vikram to take fault and then there is presenting it in logical manner. Do you trust CVs on that❓

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".