Now episode & pre-cap did give me an idea how things can move. It us likely Siddhi will come to know about Vikram's involvement in case & she may choose to confront him or not. I hope she finds that chain somewhere related Rohit case material, so it can hold some value. Now Siddhi sure wants to save Kunal but by compromising Vikram? Second thing Thakral paid SG for his testimony & to leave town. What I think Siddhi can do:
Kunal was convicted based on 2 things. SG testimony that Kunal pushed Rohit & motive established thanks to Dumbo. So she needs to attack both as Rohit's truth is not out yet. First Siddhi can go look for SG & find out he quit his job. Upon more inquiry she finds out he actually left town & his neighbors believe he had come to acquire large sum of cash as SG was behaving & talking ad he has become big man now. It is likely of people in SG's situation to Blabber such things in front of others.
So at the hearing Siddhi can once again ask to evaluate motive & action. Well Raveena issue sure provides motive but Kunal wasn't the only person involved there. Raveena's husband, father, FIL & many more were angry at Rohit for harassing Raveena. Vikram is the person who was directly involved with Rohit & had dispute over business as well. Kunal wasn't aware of thus till few hours before the accident. So there are many more people who would want Rohit dead. She can say if they found Vikram's chain near by is he the culprit given their history? Just use Vikram as an example and not incriminate him as the culprit.
Second thing is action. Well can court really rely on SG testimony? First he came & said he saw someone fight with Rohit & later changed it to seeing Kunal there. She would once again like to cross examine him and make sure what is his final testimony. But when she inquired about him, he quit his job & also left town in less than a week. Also there is some indication that he came to acquire large sum if cash. Present a witness which may say how SG behaved and indicated that. The money Kunal supposedly gave him was present ad evidence in court so wonder where he got this money from? As saying last sentence she can look at Thakral. It would definitely make Thakral angry and he may say you ate accusing me of fault practice. There Siddhi can raise last case. In front of sane judge, same lawyer had presented an eye witness saying Kunal commuted the crime & paid money to stay quite. Well if it wasn't true then, how can court be sure Dane thing is not happening here? Then Rohit is the one who came along and testified against his sister & father.
So being Rohit's past he had trouble with many. Even with Raveena, mire than Kunal were angry on him. She herself had given him warnings & that's why Thakral first charged her. But now he jumped to Kunal, wonder why is that? Because conveniently before Thakral had presented motive and action for Siddhi as well. Also given how SG changed his testimony, his current status & fact SG confessed he was drinking while witnessing a fight; how valid his testimony should be considered?
Given reasonable doubt on motive & action; court should delay the judgment and give Kunal conditional bail with someone acting as legal guardian till next hearing.
So what do you guys think?