PSF All Dramas TRP Thread #1 (DT.N. Pg 117) - Page 113

Originally posted by: SwatiSingh79

To be fair, they did re-shoot and add many scenes of Fazal Baksh

That's what I don't get it, they added much more scenes once it started getting high trps and views. So it means were the actual episode count only around 20-22🤔

Also Haalim, I just checked tb and im views and im episodes views are just few lakhs less than tb's, but even that's a commendable feat considering tb aired 1.5 years back and im just ended a few months ago, so it automatically makes a bigger blockbuster than tb.

Edit : I'm trying to add ss but idk why it's not getting updated.

Well I'm happy for both my favourites for scoring sucha big hits, they fully deserved it

https://www.facebook.com/100067954286960/posts/pfbid0324rwCwovSSeKsVNdiu7GTxgxSja8ZhWzG62D1fyc4SQyDYihJUR1SFC2Z5US5U1wl/?app=fbl

PDPTRP applies same TRP formula (female viewers 15-45 in ABCDE centers) across all shows from week to week. This means we can now compare TRPs of different shows and different episodes with each other. If we just use TRP reported by the channel, we will end up comparing apples with oranges.

Do pdtrp use this?

As per the writer he had written 26 episodes but he also said that the episode count increases when we execute it. FR added some scenes by himself but cut some important scenes from the script that made the plot go haywire.

Originally posted by: Witchofthewest

PDPTRP applies same TRP formula (female viewers 15-45 in ABCDE centers) across all shows from week to week. This means we can now compare TRPs of different shows and different episodes with each other. If we just use TRP reported by the channel, we will end up comparing apples with oranges.

Do pdtrp use this?

Yes. That's what Hypno said earlier. She surely has a deep knowledge regarding numbers.

We criticized Hum for inflating IM's ratings based on Pdtrp only. On what basis would've people criticized it then?

BARC has the official nod from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, for its job of tracking TV viewership unlike an Instagram account like pdptrp making bold claims without any official backing

BARC's approach to sample selection, metering techniques, datasets, algorithms, and statistical methods is highly transparent. They provide data across various categories including urban, rural, metropolitan areas, states, demographics, time periods, channel categories, and program genres. Viewership data is reported weekly and monthly, facilitating trend analysis over time and comparisons across different time slots.

However, there are concerns regarding urban bias due to challenges in installing barometers, recruiting and retaining rural panelists, and disparities in TV penetration. Furthermore, BARC's methodology may not fully capture viewing habits on non-traditional TV devices such as mobile devices and streaming platforms, which are increasingly popular, particularly among younger audiences.

Apart from the above mentioned issues, BARC remains notably transparent and reliable compared to obscure entity with questionable credentials, like PDPTRP.

Originally posted by: Hatimoon

BARC standard is Urban rating because of advertising money as most of ads money come from urban areas. But that doesn't mean that that TRP is the TRP of entire country.

Yes, they used to consider 45000 houses. No idea how much they have increased now. Even the founding CEO partho das gupta had acknowledged that 45k is a very small sample size and they are aiming to increase gradually.

They do not consider streaming platforms, views , DTH ,Tatasky , their own HD channels too.

So, yes, there are loopholes in barc too, but they are pretty transparent about their approach .

Originally posted by: Witchofthewest

PDPTRP applies same TRP formula (female viewers 15-45 in ABCDE centers) across all shows from week to week. This means we can now compare TRPs of different shows and different episodes with each other. If we just use TRP reported by the channel, we will end up comparing apples with oranges.

Do pdtrp use this?

They are not forthcoming with the source of information

Originally posted by: nightingale1234

BARC has the official nod from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, for its job of tracking TV viewership unlike an Instagram account like pdptrp making bold claims without any official backing

BARC's approach to sample selection, metering techniques, datasets, algorithms, and statistical methods is highly transparent. They provide data across various categories including urban, rural, metropolitan areas, states, demographics, time periods, channel categories, and program genres. Viewership data is reported weekly and monthly, facilitating trend analysis over time and comparisons across different time slots.

However, there are concerns regarding urban bias due to challenges in installing barometers, recruiting and retaining rural panelists, and disparities in TV penetration. Furthermore, BARC's methodology may not fully capture viewing habits on non-traditional TV devices such as mobile devices and streaming platforms, which are increasingly popular, particularly among younger audiences.

Apart from the above mentioned issues, BARC remains notably transparent and reliable compared to obscure entity with questionable credentials, like PDPTRP.

PDPTRP is not the one calculating TRP, none is comparing it with BARC, PDPTRP reports TRP like gossiptv and Salil Sand and since many important people from different channels do follow the page, it is pretty much a credible one

Honestly I want to know how and when people started with gauging trps through pdtrps

Cos Since last 5-6 years from when I am active in psf. Everyone considered pdtrps to be authetic.