My take on Poison Ivy & Silver Moon - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

65

Views

3.2k

Users

10

Likes

102

Frequent Posters

Rein123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#31

Coming to the scarred moon, there were some theories circulating on YouTube that the moon actually represents Lord Shiv and the scars on the moon represents the Cheel I.e. Aakesh. Which means Aakesh/Veer has some kind of secret relationship or connection with Lord Shiv, plus before he died and was bit by Naageshwari, there was a brief moment of focus on the Shivalinga for some reason, why?? What were the cvs trying to hint there?

Another theory is that Naageshwari got cursed because she killed Aakesh who although seemed evil, rogue, cruel and notorious was actually a good and straightforward simple individual and while him killing Hriday seems to be sinful it might have actually been the right thing given that Hriday may not have been the goody good naag he was shown to be.

Edited by Rein123 - 5 years ago
Rein123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: AutumnColors

15 years age difference is abit too much they should reduce it to 8 or 10 years. This confused me abit not sure but the story took a 40 years leap after they complete Brinda story so it doesn't make sense.

Dude, they’re icchaadhaari creatures, whether they have an age gap of 15 or 100 years doesn’t matter Shivanya was apparently 100 plus years older than Rithik too. Edward was a 150 years old while Bella was just 17.

libran90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: made-in-charms

Very interesting take. The scarred moon can definitely represent Hriday's reincarnation.

Thanks dear.😊

And him being absent from the mandir during the shiv puja seemed a bit odd. Where was he ? Why wasn't he there ? I think s3 wala Vikrant jaisa locha hain.

Aisa zaruri nahi ki ho. I mean midway even Vikrant turned over a new leaf. But I would for once prefer that Nag does not go rogue. But, if its a revenge saga, then who will Adi Naagin take revenge from. Kisi se to lena padega na. Anyway, lets see.

Cheel jaisa bhi tha his love was pure & honest but Nageshwari didn't value his love just because he was cheel ( just how Brinda pointed out ). Aakesh also couldn't care any less about the nagmaani.

Aakesh's love was honest, but not pure. He chose deceit, desecration, and force, which is the usual for a cheel to get what he wanted. Additionally, his intent was to obtain Naageshwari, but he also wanted the Naagmani for his father. Naageshwari gave him a chance to enter the temple out of humanity, which he used against her. Naageshwari's fault was after being given the chance of being the first shapeshifting naagin, her duty was first towards the Naagmani and its protection, she took that for granted and broke a divine order. Aakesh's fault was however honest his love was, he came to the temple with malintent. And so Naageshwari was cursed and Aakesh died. They have received this life to rectify that error. Bani's duty always has to be first toward the Naagmani, and protect it at all cost, even if that cost is losing her love, and Veer has to decide what he truly wants - Bani or the Naagmani.

I wish that none of the two male leads are/becomes evil this time. One doesn't have to turn out as the villain of the show to make way for a couple.

For once, I too wish the same.

Honestly I am not stressing anymore about this naag/cheel twist , whatever EK has planned she'll execute so koi fayda nahi hain. Filhaal I am believing whatever is being told.

That's true as well. No point doing magajmaari. But what I am sure of is that Aakesh was no ordinary cheel. There must be a reason for the prophecy of him succumbing to light. Succumbing not in the sense of dying, but rather being cleansed of the darkness that he has within. His purpose was higher than just loot, probably he was chosen to be a guardian of the temple or guardian of Adi Naagin. Naag is not meant to be her partner, but he could be devoted to the cause of protecting the Naagmani. Let's see though.

libran90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: AutumnColors

I heard the Baba said in 40 years Cheel will be reincarnated and 15 years later Naageshwari will be born Hriday will be born before you and it goes on... The subtitle could be wrong too but yeah 15 years age difference is alot.

I think 15 years is included in the 40 years. And going by that Cheels ka pura vansh will be reborn too, the big bad Daddy Cheels as well. Hriday will be reborn a year before and Naageshwari after that. But why are we bothered yaar. Supernatural order me age is no limit. After vampires and werewolves, this should not matter per se.

libran90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: IfritAmbrose

Ekta thode aur saal bada de please..baap-beti bana de unhe🤢

Itna magajmaari mat karo EK ke shows me yaar, chakram kha jaogi behen.

libran90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: AutumnColors

I am not that good with Hindi I needed the subtitle to understand better but Voot subtitle could be wrong too.

C6-F7-EDD8-7-A0-F-4-E73-B8-C8-321-E8-EA3379-A.jpgAB816-FB9-130-B-40-AB-9-DBD-9-A7-A1-B3-E1-A4-B.jpgAA8-E50-B5-E0-C4-48-BB-A3-E0-C1-BFB7516-EF5.jpg89741-D90-C966-4-DE6-B76-B-ED833-C33-F4-B0.jpg

Voot ke subtitle ka jawab nahi - arre snake aur serpent to same hi hote hai. Isse viewers ko thode hi na samajh aayega that they mean Naag and Nagin. How stupid.

libran90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: IfritAmbrose


Can I assume 15 years are included in the next 40 years??


If that's the case and it's alright..kyun??

Subtitle padke to aisa hi laga. I think the15-year timeline falls within the 40 years.

libran90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#38

Originally posted by: AutumnColors

15 years age difference is abit too much they should reduce it to 8 or 10 years. This confused me abit not sure but the story took a 40 years leap after they complete Brinda story so it doesn't make sense.

I think we are taking the age factor a bit too seriously, that too in supernatural shape-shifting order. These creatures live for over 100 years, how does it matter dear.

libran90 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: IfritAmbrose


Hmm.. whatever it is I'll assume for my sanity that Veer is not that much elder to Bani maybe by 4-5 years but usse zyada nai..


Baki ekta ka kya hai..woh toh kuch bhi intense ke naam pe chep degi..

Forget all this and focus on Cheel and Naagin. That is more interesting. Ganit ka class bitha diya hum logo ne yahaan.

Midnightsorrow thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#40

Originally posted by: libran90

I think 15 years is included in the 40 years. And going by that Cheels ka pura vansh will be reborn too, the big bad Daddy Cheels as well. Hriday will be reborn a year before and Naageshwari after that. But why are we bothered yaar. Supernatural order me age is no limit. After vampires and werewolves, this should not matter per se.

That's true I don't think age difference matters in supernatural shows.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".