I am so disappointed in Bela - Page 6

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

thinking character Less and verbalizing it in cheap way r different .even if u think her as haracterless u won't verbalize it in a cheap way bcos of Decency.I Expected That decencY From Mahir .

Now it seems no diff between vikrant and mahir in cheap verbalization as vikrant too said the same words a day before .are u ok with that mahir equals vikrant in verbalizing cheap way .

wow thinking is not wrong ,verbalizing is wrong...if verbalizing is wrong then doing it toh maha wrong n bela is actually acting like she is two timing.

vikrant tarnished her character they all thought she spent night with vikrant now they will start questioning her character.

you dint expected decent behave from bela , she is the one who is not behaving decently n you r calling this cheap touching ok n saying vikrant touch her affectionately ...for you that it not cheap n indecent but calling out this is become cheap for you .

chor ko chor nhi toh kya kanhege...n sorry to say those man /women who let their x touch them affectionately called loose character...its called indecent behavior...they both r behaving disgustingly.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

That's not twotiming ..she is not sleeping with vikrant

yes for me going to jail on false murder charges is worst than implied characterless blaming ..the later i can prove ..that i am not in a easier wzy compared to false murxer charges which r hzrd to prove that i am innocent

Iand 90 percent society does the same when practical situation comes up ..just talking hours on like us on but practical situation every one will behave to save themselves from going to jail

Originally posted by: tootyfrooty-

wow thinking is not wrong ,verbalizing is wrong...if verbalizing is wrong then doing it toh maha wrong n bela is actually acting like she is two timing.

vikrant tarnished her character they all thought she spent night with vikrant now they will start questioning her character.

you dint expected decent behave from bela , she is the one who is not behaving decently n you r calling this cheap touching ok n saying vikrant touch her affectionately ...for you that it not cheap n indecent but calling out this is become cheap for you .

chor ko chor nhi toh kya kanhege...n sorry to say those man /women who let their x touch them affectionately called loose character...its called indecent behavior...they both r behaving disgustingly.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

That's not twotiming ..she is not sleeping with vikrant

yes for me going to jail on false murder charges is worst than implied characterless blaming ..the later i can prove ..that i am not in a easier wzy compared to false murxer charges which r hzrd to prove that i am innocent

Iand 90 percent society does the same when practical situation comes up ..just talking hours on like us on but practical situation every one will behave to save themselves from going to jail

then y ur boiling your blood if mahir questioned her character after all loose character hona not a big thing for you.

bela has no intrest to save herself she said almost yelled uski ring knhi nhi giri so why r you trying to prove that she wanted a alibi thats why she was mum.

she never wanted if she wanted she has said ki ring knhi bhool gyi thi but she had no interest.

jab tumhe fark hi nhi padta characterless prove hone se toh kisike bolne se kya fark padta hai ki she is two timer...only sleeping is not comes under two timing but vikrant projected it as they slept with each other n they make out...so all will think like this.

these 2 r behaving indecently ,they r looking disgusting...behaving very cheaply ,why will other care for decency jab ye dono hi nhi care kar rahe.

cheap ko cheap hi bola jayega so mahir will say it that "its indecent n disgusting n you r disgusting""

Originally posted by: tootyfrooty-

then y ur boiling your blood if mahir questioned her character after all loose character hona not a big thing for you.

bela has no intrest to save herself she said almost yelled uski ring knhi nhi giri so why r you trying to prove that she wanted a alibi thats why she was mum.

she never wanted if she wanted she has said ki ring knhi bhool gyi thi but she had no interest.

jab tumhe fark hi nhi padta characterless prove hone se toh kisike bolne se kya fark padta hai ki she is two timer...only sleeping is not comes under two timing but vikrant projected it as they slept with each other n they make out...so all will think like this.

these 2 r behaving indecently ,they r looking disgusting...behaving very cheaply ,why will other care for decency jab ye dono hi nhi care kar rahe.

cheap ko cheap hi bola jayega so mahir will say it that "its indecent n disgusting n you r disgusting""

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Yes verbalizing is CHEAP way compared to thinking and in pov of viewers she is not shown two timing..i.e she did not sleep in vikrant room

It's it just not her ex who divorced or split ..Its her dead lover coming back .who died saving her modesty .hardly a day passed by .she needs some time ..she will tell vikrant eventually not to behave like that

She does not want vikrant to get hurted too much in one day and that is normal after all he sacrificed his life for her modesty and she feeling unfair towards vikrant for choosing mahir

So she does not want to hurt vikrant much further in a day .she will tell to vikrant eventually

Yuvi is not touch g her in cheap way according to her pov ..their intimacy was much more ..when U see that first episode song ..so in bela pov it's just affectionate touch ..but she uncomfortable bcos of mahir suspecting her

Originally posted by: tootyfrooty-

viewer r not in story why r u diverting the point ...n viewer also not liking it n saying it disgusting n cheap the way bela n yuvi behaving.



n its not about viewer its about family , yuvi projected it like they slept with each other ,bela's silent was seal the deal that this happened...so obviously in serial all family will think they slept so its called two timing...for family she is two timer.

letting x lover touching affectionately is wrong n comes under loose character category ...its called indecent behavior shameless behavior, cheap behavior.

so calling indecency a indecency is not wrong...chor ko chor hi bola jata hai

aur waise bi characterless prove hona is not disgusting according to you then why it became disgusting if a person questioned it.

jab loose character hona hi problem nhi hai toh kisi ne bol diya toh kese problem ho gyi.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

When mahir asking for bela explanation bela was trying hard to come up with some explanation .then vikrant said that and she did not retort back by saying it false bcos she knows it's the best explanation at that time to save herself...

As for mahir verbalizing I don't support it ..in fact I don't like verbalize g any one and calling them cheap in front if them even if they behave cheap.thats my decency and many people decency also in real life

I know some persons I my relatives itself but I never go in front of them and call them in cheap words verbalizing them bcos thats my decency

no she was not trying hard she even not tried she shouted " ring usik paas thi" she was not bothered.

kya verbalizing chor ko chor hi bolte hai...second they r behaving with indecency ,they r not thinking what will other think n say about them ,then why will other care.

waise bi if characterless hona problem nhi hai ,big deal nhi hai so characterless bol dena kisi ko kese big deal ho gyi.

varun wat is your problem with mahir or perl...i really think you have some old problem.

does his fans badly behaved with you in past ?if that is the case i will not counter attack you again.

Originally posted by: tootyfrooty-

no she was not trying hard she even not tried she shouted " ring usik paas thi" she was not bothered.

kya verbalizing chor ko chor hi bolte hai...second they r behaving with indecency ,they r not thinking what will other think n say about them ,then why will other care.

waise bi if characterless hona problem nhi hai ,big deal nhi hai so characterless bol dena kisi ko kese big deal ho gyi.

varun wat is your problem with mahir or perl...i really think you have some old problem.

does his fans badly behaved with you in past ?if that is the case i will not counter attack you again.

Originally posted by: tootyfrooty-

its called two timing n being characterless...your excuse is quite cheap n second bela herself was not eager for alibbi ,she clearly said ring was not removed or misplaced otherwise she would have lied that ring was misplaced ,she dint care what they think.

n you r ok if bela's character getting tarnish by vik like this...you r ok if she proved characterless but not murderer ...for you characterless proved hina is not a big thing then why you r disgusted if mahir questioned on her character after all loose character prove hona front of all is not a big thing for you.