Bela's anger - a righteous anger

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Bee Kay

@beekay1

Voyager

Posted: 7 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: durga33
Yes I agree in reality no one has the right to take another person life. We leave that up to the law to give out punishment. But @Varuni does have a point. This is a Naagin series. Snakes by nature are violent and don't hesitate to kill. So maybe how Vikrant does things back in his home or naag lok is they kill people. So that explain his behavior logically. But @DeepikaGupta9 does have a point. If Vikrant said if they leave Ruhi he will let them go he should stick by his words. However I feel Vikrant intentions for killing everyone has to be something more than him and Bela molestation.

I totally disagree with the statement that snakes by nature are violent. No animal including snakes are violent hy nature. Its fear and hunger that makes them violent. They kill for food and unless provocated. A mother animal is violent whem their babies are around. This is maternal protection.

Quote

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#12

First of all snakes aren't violent by nature.Infact no animal is violent.Animals hunt for food and not for sport.If they attack someone then its for defending themselves.Human machinations like violence,lust,jealousy,greed etc doesn't exist in their dictionary.

Snakes bite others only when provoked.If you don't bother them and just let them go their way then they won't bother with you either.Even in the Mahabharat,Naag Ashwasena wanted revenge from Arjun coz Arjun had burnt his home and killed his family.

Secondly,just coz someone is a king he doesn't have the right to kill anyone and everyone.Even in the days of the Delhi Sultanate there was a codified set of laws by which everyone had to abide.The degree of the punishment depended on the nature of the crime committed.

If someone goes around killing others just coz he felt offended and he has the power to do so then he is not a king.He is a barbarian who doesn't know right and wrong.

Bela's revenge was for Vikrant's so called death for which only Yuvi,Adi and a couple of others were responsible.Bultu,Pratham,Anu and Mahir were innocent.And if Vikrant is alive in the first place then what is the revenge for? If Vikrant was so concerned about Ruhi's molestation then he would have killed Adi long ago.He can kill him but he is not doing it.This means that getting justice for Ruhi was never his priority.His sole aim was always the Naagmani and he wanted Bela/Ruhi as a bonus for it.Had he been so concerned about Bela then he wouldn't have hidden like a rat.He would have joined BeVish in their mission.

And the reason for his hatred for Mahir is pure jealousy and hurt ego.He is unable to digest that a human like Mahir won Bela's heart while he,the so called Naagraj became a pappu.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Cold coffee_mania

@Fruitcustard_9

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#13

Animals r not violent by nature when some one attack them or they feel danger then only they became defensive. Animal do understand d language of luv & hatred both. Snake also dont hurt anyone unnecessary

Quote

Priya

@Priya258

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: LawlessLawyer
First of all snakes aren't violent by nature.Infact no animal is violent.Animals hunt for food and not for sport.If they attack someone then its for defending themselves.Human machinations like violence,lust,jealousy,greed etc doesn't exist in their dictionary.
Snakes bite others only when provoked.If you don't bother them and just let them go their way then they won't bother with you either.Even in the Mahabharat,Naag Ashwasena wanted revenge from Arjun coz Arjun had burnt his home and killed his family.

Secondly,just coz someone is a king he doesn't have the right to kill anyone and everyone.Even in the days of the Delhi Sultanate there was a codified set of laws by which everyone had to abide.The degree of the punishment depended on the nature of the crime committed.
If someone goes around killing others just coz he felt offended and he has the power to do so then he is not a king.He is a barbarian who doesn't know right and wrong.

Bela's revenge was for Vikrant's so called death for which only Yuvi,Adi and a couple of others were responsible.Bultu,Pratham,Anu and Mahir were innocent.And if Vikrant is alive in the first place then what is the revenge for? If Vikrant was so concerned about Ruhi's molestation then he would have killed Adi long ago.He can kill him but he is not doing it.This means that getting justice for Ruhi was never his priority.His sole aim was always the Naagmani and he wanted Bela/Ruhi as a bonus for it.Had he been so concerned about Bela then he wouldn't have hidden like a rat.He would have joined BeVish in their mission.
And the reason for his hatred for Mahir is pure jealousy and hurt ego.He is unable to digest that a human like Mahir won Bela's heart while he,the so called Naagraj became a pappu.

Totally nailed it👏

Quote

VARUNI2014

@VARUNI2014

Rocker

Posted: 7 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: durga33
Yes I agree in reality no one has the right to take another person life. We leave that up to the law to give out punishment. But @Varuni does have a point. This is a Naagin series. Snakes by nature are violent and don't hesitate to kill. So maybe how Vikrant does things back in his home or naag lok is they kill people. So that explain his behavior logically. But @DeepikaGupta9 does have a point. If Vikrant said if they leave Ruhi he will let them go he should stick by his words. However I feel Vikrant intentions for killing everyone has to be something more than him and Bela molestation.

He Made That Offer When He Was Not Shot and he said he won't harm if they leave her and go. they left her but they shot him

So that offer invalid even then itself

Now vik has right to revenge bcos they shot him

U can't apply human laws to non human .

Vikrant is a snake .a snake won't be silent if u fired a bullet shot and it survives somehOWS

Snakes R Supposed To Be Famous For Revenge .That's Why No One Messes Up With Them.These Boys Murders Their Own Doing

Edited by VARUNI2014 - 7 years ago

Quote

VARUNI2014

@VARUNI2014

Rocker

Posted: 7 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
Animals r not violent by nature when some one attack them or they feel danger then only they became defensive. Animal do understand d language of luv & hatred both. Snake also dont hurt anyone unnecessary

Animal never sit calm if a bullet is shot at them and it survives .ever been in a cage with a wounded lion ..

Wounded animals r too dangerous

And that too u shot a bullet and snake and if it she I as it won't sit calm .

ONCE in my native place one boy threw a stone u know right in villages with the help of thread and stone they target and hit birds .and that crow got Injured

And literally for two months when ever the boy came out herds of crows after him and trying to poke his head as they can't kill him

And imagine a snake then will it keep silent if u shot a bullet at it and it survives

Quote

Cold coffee_mania

@Fruitcustard_9

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#17

@ tm

bela was right in her anger & stand , she had right also coz we dont know what she went through in those 6 months ..

we cant underestimate bela after shaan track when she know how 2 play .

Edited by deepikagupta9 - 7 years ago

Quote

Priya

@Priya258

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#18

There is two perspectives one is of Bella and another one is of Vikrant.

According to Bela,most specifically she wanted to take revenge of Vikrant's death.Molestation part was sidelined most of the time.She hardly mentioned about this once or twice.Now that Vikrant is alive she is not feeling right to kill them.But one thing which will not change that they were molesters.And regarding killing only Adi is culprit.He gave revolver to Yuvi but Yuvi couldn't kill.Bus RJ is left.But those who already died they shouldn't be called as innocent as they were molesters.But they are innocent as they didn't try to kill.It was Adi only.Bela had misconception that all of them were killer which were wrong.Mahir,Anu,Bultu,Pratham is totally innocent.They were not part of molestation and killing.Anyways as now she witnessed Vik is alive she is not feeling right that they got killed.

According to Vikrant,his seeking for revenge is totally baseless.Mahir,Anu,Pratham and Bultu was not part of molestation and he doesn't have misconception like Bela has regarding who shot him.He knew now Adi shot him.If he want to take revenge so he should kill Adi and for molestation only RJ is left.But he is not going to do so.He is behind Mahir just because of his personal insecurity.He will kill Anu now who have no idea what was her fault.

Did she molest Ruhi? Did she shot Vikrant?

There is something which we don't know.How did Vik survive? His story seemed totally fake.What was the need to take info of Bela from months from Adi.Itna pyar h toh samne aajata.

I just want ki Bela shouldn't feel she killed innocent people those who died was culprit.They were molesters.