Mahir will not support Bela - Page 4

Originally posted by: masked

@Ashraje 17 your post on Maahir seems too judgemental.You imply that as if Maahir has forced himself on Bela right on the first day of their wedding night.Maahir & Ritik are not flawless I agree but they have not/never voluntarily forced on their respective wives Shivanya & Bela.Maahir was not being judgemental regarding Bela's pregnancy.Unfortunately for every heinious deed committed by a man our patriarchial.society blames Woman for it.Maahir knew exactly what kind of humiliation Bela would have faced for being pregnant with an illegitimate child of Yuvi though in reality she was not.It was all part of Bela hate plan by that irritating Anu.Irrespective of gender every individual deserves full justice.Which man woulf be ready to.adopt the child of another man & give him his name? Not only Maahir even Ritik would have done that in his place.Such kind of men are hard to find who is ready to give anything for their love.Ritik & Maahir might have judgemental.flaws but when push comes to.shove both Maahir & Ritik.will die for their soulmates.I daresay that Maahir would still protect Bela even if she's a Naagin.Maahir might be damn stubborn but he will stick & stand by her even against his own family once he comes to know the truth.Maahir loves Bela more than his life already & he will put his life on the line again & again bcoz his love is greater than any other flaw or stubborness the same way Ritik.did for Shivanya.Its Bela who is rude to him understandably bcoz of her inherent suspicion but fails to realize that if Maahir is the killer why would he put himself in danger for her? Maahir is neither completely perfect nor flawless.He never judged Bela wrongly neither forced himself on her even though Bela is his wife.Both Maahir & Ritik treated their respective soulmates as their equal better-halves unlike other men who prefer to treat their wives as either a toy or sexual.commodity.

Originally posted by: Ash.raje17

@masked I never said Mahir sexually forced himself on Bella.

In today's age the word consent is greatly abused. Its representation in the media is such that if it is used, the meaning implies at an underlying sexual meaning. But consent simply means permission to do something. So when I said he did not ask for her consent, I meant that he did not ask for her permission before he took decisions concerning her life.

Like marrying her. It not only impacted his family but also greatly impacted Bella's life. He should have at least told her that Yuvi is missing. BUt he did not do that.

Also when he decided to call back Yuvi. It affected Bella greatly. But instead of asking whether that is what she wanted, he simply went ahead and called Yuvi back. If he did not want to accept that child then he should have told everyone that the child is not his . He did not have any right to take decisions on behalf of Bella.

That is what I meant by consent. The third instance I had misunderstood. varuni2014 corrected me.

When I said he had pushed her against the wall when she tried to brush him off when he was questioning her about Rehan, I was talking about his aggressive personality. The calm and composed exterior has an aggressive person underneath. I wanted to say that, that aggressive side of his will come out. I was also trying to point out that the evidence so far suggests that he has never trusted her word without proof. She had to do a pregnancy test for him to believe that she was not pregnant. Him not believing when she said that she was not pregnant was him, in a way implying that she and Yuvi had had sex with each other.

I am sorry for not making myself sufficiently clear.

@VARUNI2014 Thanks 😳

Originally posted by: Jobcy

What I have observed from mahir behaviour is that what is his should be his no body else's. So what will be his reaction when he will learn that Bella loved someone else before him would be worth to see

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

U have to think like this also ...why did bela cheat him ..did she cheat him for a wrong purpose or did she cheat him for dharma

She did cheat but it is for dharma i.e to punish rapists ..

Some say Krishna heated in mahabharat but it is for dharma ..every thing is right

If u cheat for a wrong thing like for power and money like duryodhana then it is wrong

So Mahir if he has any Intellect should be with bela once anu or bulto confess what happened that night

But dramabaaz CV don't k ow what they will do for trp

Originally posted by: tootyfrooty-

no one like cheater krishna dint cheat he replied those who were wrong from front not from behind ,he went for a sandhi or peace one night before fight start bcs he dint want to innocent ppl die ,he requested 5 village for pandav but duryodhan refuse so he has to fight with him. ....i hope you know d difference between front attack n peeth piche chura ghopna ,dishonest hona n trust ka advantage lena , krishna never did it

and happy janmashtami. 😳

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Yeah ..but bela needs to take revenge right .how can she take it if she reveals truth to Mahir ..at the max Mahir would have sent them to jail and they would be out on bail the next day roaming and if possible raping other helpless gals ..so where is the justice for what happened to ruhi

Krishna is almighty powerful ..so he knows duryodhana can't do anything to him ..so he can come from front ..

But here case is not like that ..she needs revenge and she followed path of dharma only ..killing a ruthless rapist or who follows adharma is not wrong ..what ever sneaky way u fo,low it is ok

Lord rama killed vaali from back I a sneaky way only bcos it's impossi me to kill from front ..vaali had a boon sometimes u hzve to do thi gs sbeakily from back to get justice

In kurukshetra war Krishna did so many things on back ..he was not straight forward ..just to save dharma he did it and said it's not wrong

Same way bela can't do it straight forward.

Originally posted by: tootyfrooty-

then dont compare her with krishna...bela is powerful , more powerful then human , those boys r human she has powers so they r weak ,simple human front of her.

krishna dint do anything in kurushetra there was battle on , both side were planning n plotting , in all battles this happens ...when two army fight they dont share their chaal ...india n pakistan army fight they use diffrent tricks on each other but they do from front , both party knows battle is on n we r in battle ground same way in kusukshetra everyone knows its battle ...opposite team knew dusri party is planning something ,in answer they used to plan.

so duryodhan knew krishna n the part will think some tricks against them ,same way krishn -arjun knew ...thats all allowed in battled ground ,they r not showing frendship n then stabbing from behind ...so your comparison is not vallid, you r comparing apple n orange.

bela can attack these mere human anywhere ,actually everywhere , they roam in nights alone...they r nothing front of bela's powers.

n duryodhan n karn did tried to capture krishna.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Forget about Krishna

Lord rama killed vaali the rapist from behind itself .bcos killing vaali from front us I possible for rama too.

Yes naagin can kill them any where ..they r powerful ..but there are total 10 members .if u kill one then others would get alerted and might wear some magical powerful objects powerful enough to save them from naagin ..quite possible then how can they take revenge easily

Point is killing one by one without sehgal or mittal family getting doubt that naagin killed them so all this drama and planning by bevish