Amba usurps Sia's role? - Page 2

Absolutely, Amba's role should have some sense and purpose attached to it, otherwise there's no need for all these nautanki. i feel that AMba can actually do a great job to get the women inside the haveli back on track, like they don't need to follow everything that Ammaji says or preaches. She cans how them that Ammaji is too a vulnerable individual and one really doesn't have to cower down to her always.

Amba has to initiate the changes and Sia has to carry them forward. That's how things should be.

Amba would be the destroyer and Sia- the creator and nurturer.

Originally posted by: poetic

Absolutely, Amba's role should have some sense and purpose attached to it, otherwise there's no need for all these nautanki. i feel that AMba can actually do a great job to get the women inside the haveli back on track, like they don't need to follow everything that Ammaji says or preaches. She cans how them that Ammaji is too a vulnerable individual and one really doesn't have to cower down to her always.

Amba has to initiate the changes and Sia has to carry them forward. That's how things should be.

Amba would be the destroyer and Sia- the creator and nurturer.

@ poetic:
i always loved your posts poetic. n yes amba has some purpose , she is like the one who will light the flame n then others crry the flame forward.....i m just loving the super dominating amba wat about u all?

was thinking abt de same thing.....
bt sia character is nt worth defeating ammaji..and nw dat ammaji is her mother-in-law and she luvs raghav really very much...she wont and cnt do nythin against her...i think....

and de character of amba is fantabulous.....i jst luv her...

Originally posted by: arunima_luvdsky

@ poetic:
i always loved your posts poetic. n yes amba has some purpose , she is like the one who will light the flame n then others crry the flame forward.....i m just loving the super dominating amba wat about u all?

Thanks a lot Arunima. 😊

AMba should initiate some changes - otherwise I am not interested in some dimwit.

See I am also enjoying the super-dominating Amba but again, to me, she is just a temporaray solution which cannot bring much changes in Ammaji or in the haveli. Whatever is now happenign is due to the struggle between two power points or foci and whoever havign the greater muscle power and situational control is winning.

But pertinent change cannot happen in this way. Hence Sia will always be important, even in her dominant state.

Originally posted by: aparajhita

was thinking abt de same thing.....
bt sia character is nt worth defeating ammaji..and nw dat ammaji is her mother-in-law and she luvs raghav really very much...she wont and cnt do nythin against her...i think....

and de character of amba is fantabulous.....i jst luv her...

Toh isse accha ek talwar lekey maidaan pe utar jaatey hai, jo bachti hai uski jeet - yea toh Ammaji, yea to Sia ...

But what would be the result of the outcome? Zilch.

What she can do is humongous - it's only the CVs who are extra dumb.