A.R.Rahman (Fan Club) - Page 94

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.3k

Views

87.3k

Users

37

Frequent Posters

dayita thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
First Night reviews

The Times March 24, 2006

Theatre

The Lord of the Rings

Sam Marlowe at the Princess of Wales Theatre, Toronto

Listen to an exclusive demo recording from the stage version of The Lord of the Rings here Not unlike the red, lidless orb of the evil Sauron, the eye of the theatre world swivelled towards Toronto last night for the long-awaited opening of the stage version of J. R. R. Tolkien's epic trilogy.
< =text/>NI_MPU('middle');
It is a collaboration between the director Matthew Warchus, Shaun McKenna (book and lyrics), the composer A. R. Rahman, who is best known for Bombay Dreams, and the Finnish folk group Varttina under the musical supervision of Christopher Nightingale. It is also an enterprise daring almost to the point of foolhardiness. Yet, on the whole, it works, without resorting to the slick but soulless spectacle of Cirque du Soleil, or declining into Gothic clich, a pitfall even Peter Jackson's celebrated films did not entirely succeed in avoiding. The stage version's great strength lies in the way its constituent parts combine in an organic whole. Warchus insists that the show is not a musical, and certainly there are few conventional show tunes here. Songs arise directly from the action and are less concerned with expressing an inner emotional state than with representing ritual or a fragment of an oral and musical history passed down and shared. Equally, Rob Howell's designs, exquisitely lit by Paul Pyant, are achieved with uncluttered economy rather than hi-tech wizardry, and with an emphasis on natural textures and colours redolent of the story's Middle-earth setting. The score is a bewitching blend of smooth and jagged, lush and sparse. Female voices keening in close harmony shiver like quicksilver beneath a confrontation between Gandalf and the treacherous Saruman; a hymn-like chorale accompanies the departure of the newly formed Fellowship from Rivendell. There are folksy wayfaring songs for the Hobbits and insistent, throbbing drums of war gathering pace and volume as events grow darker. Visually, the show's rough- theatre aesthetic is put to dazzlingly inventive use. Orcs leap and somersault on springed shoes; puppetry and stiltwalking ingeniously bring to life Shelob, the giant spider, and Black Riders that exude menace. In one breathtaking moment, the discovery of the ring on a riverbed by Gollum's ill-fated friend Deagol is enacted by the character's emergence from the dizzying height of the flies, swimming stagewards in a perfect shaft of watery light. There are, however, significant disappointments. The Balrog looks as if it has been made of baking foil. The Battle of Helm's Deep makes dynamic use of the stage's revolve and multiple moving levels, and of Peter Darling's bold, thrilling choreography, only to peter out in feeble flagwaving. James Loye is an appealing Frodo, and his relationship with Peter Howe's touchingly loyal Sam Gamgee is the show's beating heart. Michael Therriault is terrific as Gollum, full of bitter, sibilant wit, and squirming and convulsing with pain and repressed desire for his Precious. Evan Buliung makes Aragorn suitably virile and intense, and Carly Street is a dignified, pure-voiced Arwen. But Rebecca Jackson Mendoza is a lifeless Galadriel and is saddled with by far the worst song — an irksome and incongruous power ballad that she belts out slightly flat. Still less satisfactory is Brent Carver as Gandalf. Clearly young for the role, Carver does nothing to suggest the gravitas, wisdom or authority of age and seems hesitant and ill at ease, not remotely the powerful, world-weary wizard he should be. In the end, though, theatrical magic wins out over the weaknesses. "Stories we tell will cast their spell, now and for always," sing Frodo and Sam. With some fine tuning, this tale could hold its audience in total thrall. For now, its best moments are, like the ring, an intoxicating enchantment.

The show is due to arrive in the West End of London next year.

  • The title of the exclusive track is Lothlrien. It is played as the Fellowship emerges from Moira, and is offered refuge in the Elvish haven of Lothlrien. The music is by A R Rahman, Vrttinwith Christopher Nightingale. This track is a demo version, not a recording from the production currently on stage in Toronto.
  • http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,14936-2100 281,00.html
    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago
    Were Critics Dazzled by The Lord of the Rings in Toronto?
    by Broadway.com Staff


    James Loye in
    The Lord of the Rings
    The stage adaptation of The Lord of the Rings trilogy has been so eagerly anticipated that critics from multiple countries flocked to Canada for its March 23 opening at Toronto's Princess of Wales Theatre. Did they enjoy their time in Middle Earth? Here is a sampling of what they had to say: Mark Shenton in his Broadway.com Review: "Transferring Tolkien's massive adventure fantasy to the stage may have seemed an epic folly. But as cleverly (if not necessarily always clearly) distilled by director Matthew Warchus, who has also co-written the adaptation with Shaun McKenna, a constantly unfolding pageant of character and confrontations between good and evil evolves across one hurtling evening that, though admittedly long at close to four hours (including two intermissions), is never dull... Like the fabled ring that can render its wearer invisible while giving him extraordinary powers, Warchus, too, is the invisible power broker who has seamlessly stitched together the collaborative efforts of a huge team into the common purpose to bring this story to thrilling stage life as a bold, spectacular piece of popular musical theater that delivers a knock-out visual and aural experience." Ben Brantley of The New York Times: "An hour or so into what feels like eons of stage time, one wise, scared little hobbit manages to express the feelings of multitudes. 'This place is too dim and tree-ish for me,' mutters a round-ish, twee-ish creature named Pippin, groping through a shadowy forest in the second act of the very expensive, largely incomprehensible musical version of The Lord of the Rings... You speak not the half of it, O cherub-cheeked lad of Middle Earth. The production in which you exist so perilously is indeed a murky, labyrinthine wood from which no one emerges with head unmuddled, eyes unblurred or eardrums unrattled. Everyone and everything winds up lost in this $25 million adaptation of J. R. R. Tolkien's cult-inspiring trilogy of fantasy novels. That includes plot, character and the patience of most ordinary theatergoers." Sam Marlowe of The London Times: "On the whole, it works, without resorting to the slick but soulless spectacle of Cirque du Soleil, or declining into Gothic clich, a pitfall even Peter Jackson's celebrated films did not entirely succeed in avoiding. The stage version's great strength lies in the way its constituent parts combine in an organic whole… Rob Howell's designs, exquisitely lit by Paul Pyant, are achieved with uncluttered economy rather than hi-tech wizardry, and with an emphasis on natural textures and colours redolent of the story's Middle-earth setting. The score is a bewitching blend of smooth and jagged, lush and sparse." Richard Ouzounian of The Toronto Star: "The problems with this version of The Lord of the Rings are so basic that you wonder how those involved with it could watch it coming together and still not see what was wrong. To begin with, it looks like no one ever decided what kind of show it was meant to be… There's a saccharine ballad between Arwen and Aragorn that's repeated endlessly, a lengthy dance number at the Prancing Pony Inn that stops the action dead in every sense of the word and a meandering new-age anthem for Galadriel to warble while dressed in disco finery. But when push comes to shove and the big emotional moments arrive, no one ever actually gets to sing… The script by Shaun McKenna and Warchus is also problematic. In its desire to compress three books into one evening, it sacrifices any kind of depth in the name of forward motion." John Coulbourn of The Toronto Sun: "Designer Rob Howell has woven a warren of roots into a fabulous set... The same sense of lavish determination is also evident in Howell's costumes and Paul Pyant's often magical lighting design. This show is, in short, everything they've promised it would be. And somehow, just a little bit less. Because, finally, it all falls victim to its own hype. After promising the world a unique experience--something akin to an explosive theatrical union between Cirque du Soleil and Shakespeare--what they deliver instead is a rather well-behaved child of a union between J.R.R. Tolkien and The Lion King, with more than just a hint or two of Slava's Snowshow thrown in for good measure."
    Story continues below


    Robert Cushman of The National Post: "The theatrical version of J.R.R. Tolkien's trilogy has its faults, most of them coming unshakably with the territory, but scenically, technically and imaginatively, it's a marvel. Under Matthew Warchus' implacably disciplined direction, hardly any of the effects are gratuitous... Rob Howell's sets, a forest of invention with withered branches as the governing motif, pull not just the stage but the auditorium into Middle Earth, as does Paul Pyant's lighting, which, in its beauty and variety, calls for the coining of new superlatives... The adaptation, by Shaun McKenna and the director, is outstandingly intelligent." David Rooney of Variety: "It's gratifying to report that in its elaborate design and massive scale, The Lord of the Rings channels all that investment into an imposing, often impressive visual and aural spectacle. Too bad this respectful but somewhat arduous trudge through Middle-earth never summons comparable resources in the storytelling department… The mega-musical (premiering in Toronto before a planned spring 2007 bow in London) is an emotionally hollow behemoth intently focused on ticking off its storyboard checklist. It hurtles through 1,000 pages of plot soup without pausing to investigate the heart of the beloved tale or its multispecies characters." John Mckay of The Canadian Press: "Clocking in at a hefty 3 1/2 hours (with two brief intermissions), the epic fantasy is full of energy and wonder. Yes, plot and character development are compressed, but the production's sensory-stimulating sound and light show is easily the match of those digital effects that set the Peter Jackson motion picture versions apart. And it easily surpasses the dazzle that has become the trademark of Cirque du soleil performances. There isn't a weak link in all the elements - the sound, music, lighting, costumes. The acting can be stentorian at times but seems in keeping with the nature of the original dialogue." Michael Kuchwara of The Associated Press: "The joy of the Rings trilogy is not only in its entrancing, heroic tales but in its staggering detail--an entire world--brought to life. But what finally appears in this earnest theatrical incarnation has been severely condensed and flattened, drained of much of the spirit, emotion and peculiarities that make the Tolkien novels so appealing to scholars and fantasy nerds alike. Despite the simplification, what's left is a confusing and long evening - more than 3 1/2 hours--of theater that occasionally erupts into moments of satisfying spectacle and elegant design." Charles McNulty of The Los Angeles Times: "Neither a straight drama nor a traditional musical, the new production succeeds only as a dazzling spectacle. Even so, you'll need to bone up on the books just to follow what's going on, let alone enjoy the ride. Or better yet, get the DVDs, which for all their interminable length demonstrate how material as intractable as Tolkien's can be made dramatically addictive…. Pity the production can't be judged exclusively on its design--it would be roundly considered a hit." Chris Jones of The Chicago Tribune: "Warchus has indeed created an eye-popping musical pageant on a set that attacks the Princess of Wales Theatre with endlessly flexible hills, dales, precipices and thick, thick foliage. To their great credit, Warchus and co-author Shaun McKenna have managed to stick this sprawling narrative on a stage without losing scale, dignity or coherence. Tolkien fans will love them for that. And it will be enough to avert this ambitious show from collapsing in an ocean of Canadian disappointment. But behold a paradox. Lord is now viable on stage because of the popularity of the movies. Yet even at this stunning budgetary level, theater can't compete with film unless it finds its own, distinctive language. That hasn't sufficiently happened here. And as a result, the iconography of the show isn't fresh enough. Yet, at least." J. Kelly Nestruck of The Boston Globe: "The show's international creative team has created a stage epic that is surprisingly smart and visually stunning… While The Lord of the Rings leaves behind most Broadway musical conventions--though Saruman's send-off of the orcs to capture the hobbits does conjure up a certain Wicked Witch telling her monkeys to 'Fly, fly!'--Tolkien-heads will be pleased to know that the stage show hews very closely to the books, more so than Peter Jackson's movies, and leaves little out. Less reverent audience members will wish that more had been left behind, as the show stretches to 3 1/2 hours with two intermissions."

    Evan Buliung & Carly Street in The Lord of the Rings
    Tony Brown of The Cleveland Plain Dealer: "With a $23 million budget, a cast of 55, a 3-hour-and-45-minute run time and special effects raining down from the ceiling, the new musical version of J.R.R. Tolkien's epic trilogy is expensively, lengthily and unspectacularly dull, dull and dull. After all the money and months of rehearsals and previews leading up to Thursday night's media-blitz opening, the mega-enterprise smells of pipeweed smoke and funhouse mirrors…. Eleven composers take credit for the music (A.R. Rahman, Christopher Nightingale and a nine-member folk band from Finland called Varttina). But there are hardly any songs. It's almost all underscoring and little of it as elegant as Howard Shore's film scores… It all plays more like a term paper than a play." Martin F. Kohn of The Detroit Free Press: "For Detroiters, is it worth the 4 1/2 -hour drive and tickets that top out at $107(U.S.)? It is… Visually, LOTR is stunning… Musically, The Lord of the Rings is an improbable hybrid that works… The cast is vast--55 actors--and admirable." Charles Spencer of The Telegraph: "There is nothing here to rival the imaginative visual coups and heart-tugging emotion of such great family shows as Billy Elliot, The Lion King and Mary Poppins. And though the musical score, by the Indian film composer AR Rahman, the Finnish group Vrttin and the show's musical supervisor Christopher Nightingale is an engaging mixture of folk rock, trippy-hippy mysticism and eastern chants, it doesn't, at least on first hearing, seem to offer any memorable take-home numbers… There's a 55-strong cast, but they are often under-employed… Peter Darling's folksy choreography isn't a patch on his dazzling work on Billy Elliot."

    Kamal Al-Solaylee of The Globe and Mail: "[The Lord of the Rings] may boast of its record-breaking cost, but it still looks a lot like unfinished business. The blueprint for the adaptation--a heroic, if misguided, undertaking billed as a hybrid of drama, music and spectacle--is now in place. All it needs is an engaging storytelling approach, an emotional arc, credible performances and a more coherent musical score. In other words, what's missing from this adaptation is the essence of theatre itself as that divine place for sharing stories and forging emotional connections between the audience and the performers.

    http://www.broadway.com/gen/Buzz_Story.aspx?ci=526588
    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago
    A startling but very logical coincidences between two of the greatest men of 90's/......they characterised the 90's and were icons of the youth at that time(including me)......just see the startling similarities between these 2:

    Comprehensive similarities between A.R.Rahman and Sachin Tendulkar:

    Entry into their respective fields:
    A.R.Rahman: 1992
    Sachin Tendulkar: 1989

    They were an instant hit because:
    A.R.Rahman: Blasting music, classical songs at a very young age
    Sachin Tendulkar: Swashbuckling batting and a great cricketing sense at a very young age

    How they stood out from others?
    A.R.Rahman: First to bring digital touch to Indian music and compose fusion that no one else dares to think off
    Sachin Tendulkar: First to explore the first 15-over restriction, score centuries at bouncy, tough tracks like Perth.

    As time moved on:
    A.R.Rahman: Stopped producing blasting music, instead delivered Classical melodies like Taal & swades out of maturity.
    Sachin Tendulkar: Stopped going over the top to bowlers, instead played exquisite drives and late cuts and produced innings with a lot of maturity

    Character similarity:
    A.R.Rahman: Shy towards media and lets his keyboard answer his critics
    Sachin Tendulkar: Shy towards media and lets his bat answer his critics

    Media point of view:
    A.R.Rahman: Darling of Mumbai and London press
    Sachin Tendulkar: Darling of Mumbai and London press

    International attention:
    A.R.Rahman: Admired by Andrew Lloyd Webber , Micheal jackson ( who wore a t-shirt having Rahman's photo on it) and many other international music reviewers who want him to compose for Hollywood films.
    Sachin Tendulkar: Adored by the man himself the "DON", Mike atherton( who compared sachin to W.G.Grace) and a never ending list of Australian,English,Kiwi,Westindian players.

    Earnings:
    A.R.Rahman: Draws 1 Crore/ film, ambassador of Bharti telecom, sizzled with the Airtel ad
    Sachin Tendulkar: unimaginable money on contracts with big commercial giants and sizzles in Pepsi ads

    Records:
    A.R.Rahman: 4 national awards, 16 filmfare awards, his music sold 200 million copies around the world and success rate of 80%+ album sales in Indian movies.
    Sachin Tendulkar: Look at this for a record: 37 ODI centuries, 35 TEST centuries, 13,000+ runs in ODI's, 44+ average in ODI's and 58+ average in Tests. What else u can ask for?

    Popularity:
    A.R.Rahman: Has a huge fan following in India and in south he is a demi-god and captures the imagination of NRI's throughout the world
    Sachin Tendulkar: According to a survey, he is the most popular man in the Country edging out Prime minister and Shah-rukh-khan. He is popular in places like U.S where even the game is not that popular (featured in an exclusive article in an American sports magazine)

    Career Graph & Present form:
    A.R.Rahman: Had fabulous nineties with all his albums doing well in this time. Reached dizzying heights during this period. Have had flops with major banners since 2001, which got the critics interested. Had a great 2003 within this lean patch with Boys creating sales records. His fans base however is intact, proved that with success of A Ah album.
    Sachin Tendulkar: The star of 90's, his batting propelled him into a youth icon status in India and was concurred with many awards from the government. Being pressurized by the detractors for a imaginary loss of form and injury worries since 2001. Had a great world cup 2003 scoring runs at will. Recently has had a good innings in a one-day match to prove that he is still fit.
    (Their career-graph is one of the most fascinating things I have ever noticed, they always seem to have good times together. Bad times also coincides for both of them)

    Fans:
    A.R.Rahman: Die-hard fans want him to go back to 90's style of composing
    Sachin Tendulkar: Never say die fans want him to take up 90's style of swashbuckling batting.

    Successors:
    A.R.Rahman: His successors like Yuvan shankar raja and himesh reshammiya are more successful than him right now but no way near to him in terms of class
    Sachin Tendulkar: Yuvraj Singh, Mohammed Kaif are more popular with people than him right now but as the old west-Indian saying goes: FORM IS TEMPORARY BUT CLASS IS PERMANENT.

    Duplicates:
    A.R.Rahman: Has a duplicate called Harris jeyaraj who not only copies his music and composing style but also his hairstyle and way of speaking in interviews.
    Sachin Tendulkar: Virendar sehwag, a natural duplicate of sachin with looks and batting style similar to him called "Najafgarh ka Tendulkar". (Najafgarh is Virendar sehwag's hometown.)

    Where will they end up?:
    A.R.Rahman: Probably will put India into the world map of music and create records which upcoming Indain M.D's can just dream off
    Sachin Tendulkar: It would probably take an android or a special species of human being to erase his record in Cricket. Will always be remembered as the greatest ever Batsman of modern era.

    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago
    A R Rahman

    With his mop of curls, T-shirt and jeans, he looks like a teenage college student, but his first film score, Roja, fetched him the National Film Award, in 1992, and thrust him into the limelight.
    In the five years since Roja, he has created music for blockbuster Indian films, including Pudhiya Mugam, Gentleman, Kizhaku Seemaiyilae, Duet, Kadalan, Bombay, May, Madham, Indian, Muthu, Kadhal Desam and Love Birds. His 1995 soundtrack for Bombay crossed 5 million units and Rahman arrived as the King of Indian Pop" with sales of more than 40 million albums over a period of 3 years.

    Allah Rakha Rahman was born A.S. Dileep Kumar on January 6, 1966, in Madras, to a musically affluent family. Dileep started learning the piano at the tender age of four. But at the age of nine, his father passed away. The pressure of supporting his family fell on Dileep. At the age of 11, he joined Illaiyaraja's troupe as a keyboard player. All this had an adverse affect on his education, and finally he dropped out of school altogether.

    Eventually, he played with various orchestras, and accompanied Zakir Hussain on world tours. All this experience enabled him to earn a scholarship to the famed Trinity College of Music at Oxford University from where he obtained a degree in Western Classical Music.

    After he returned, he continued to be a part of various music troupes and local rock bands. Rahman branched out into advertising in 1987, when he was asked to compose a jingle to promote a range of watches. The ads were a success, and over the next five years, Rahman would compose more than 300 jingles. He also released his first album, of Muslim devotional songs, titled Deen Isai Malai and the English album, Set Me Free. Both went unnoticed in the market.

    In 1989, he started a small studio of his own, called Panchathan Record Inn, attached to his house. This would later develop into one of India's most well equipped and advanced recording studios. In his established state of the art sound and recording studio he began experimenting in sound engineering, design and production.

    He also began a collection of sound samples, creating one of the most comprehensive sonic libraries in Asia. The move to movies came during an advertising awards function, where he met Mani Ratnam. Mani requested for a sample of his wares. The composer readily complied and invited the director over to his studio. Mani was hooked, and signed on Rahman to score the music for his next film Roja. The rest is, as they say, history.

    Rahman's blitzkreig continued, and his first break with Hindi films came with Ram Gopal Varma's Rangeela. Rahman unleashed his tunes and created mass frenzy. His Tanha tanha was seduction personified. Mani Ratnam picked him for his first Hindi film, Dil Se, and the rest, as they say, is history. His flirtation with Hindi films continued, and Subhash Ghai's Taal landed on his lap next. The composer displayed his versatility with the tunes he composed. Rahman also got an opportunity to work with Deepa Mehta, on the music of Fire and 1947 Earth

    The maestro promises a splash in 2001 with One 2 Ka 4, Love You Hamesha and Aamir Khan's long-awaited Lagaan. The genius remains unstoppable!

    (Source : www.indya.com)
    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago

    A R RAHMAN



    Allah Rakha Rahman! A music director known to have brought a revolution in the Indian film music scenario, when it was needed the most. Born on January 6th, 1967 this whizkid is the son of a music arranger and conductor R.K. Shekhar. Rahman was nine years old, when his father passed away. By the age of eleven A. R. Rahman performed on television. After his personal tragedy he did some soul searching and decided to convert himself in Islam.

    This genius is the most sought after music director of the generationext. In his career spanning eight years, Rahman has bagged as many as eleven filmfare awards and two national awards.

    While working for a music band, Rahman also worked for ad-jingles. Mani Ratnam signed A. R. Rahman as his tunes sounded fresh and least influenced by the South India's music icon Illayaaraja. By 1992 Roja (Ye Haseen Wadiyan) was Rahman's first film. So enticing was the music that the numbers even defied the language barrier. The tunes were heard and loved by non-Tamilians. Soon Gentleman followed Roja, and 'Chiku Biiku Raile' became a chart-buster. Rahman was now the uncrowned Prince of music.

    A. R. Rahman though a known name now in Bollywood, composed for his first Hindi film Rangeela (Hai Rama,Pyar Ye Jaane) for Ram Gopal Verma in 1995. The film went on to become Rahman's biggest hit and the most original score of that year. Then other films like Hum Se Hai Muqabala (Muqabala,Urvashi Urvashi), Hindustani (Telephone Dhun), Thiruda Thiruda (Chandralekha), Jeans (Ajooba Hai, Columbus) Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa (Tu Hi Tu, Mere Dil Ka), etc followed. Rahman was being accused of being repetitive. But with films like Bombay (Tu Hi Re, Kehna Hi Kya), Vande Mataram (Maa Tujhe Salaam, Only you), Iruvar (Naramugaye), Dil se (Chhaiya Chhaiya, Jiya Jale, Dil se re) and Taal (Ishq Bina, Taal Se Taal, Ramta Jogi), 1947 Earth (Rut Aagyi Re,Ishwar Allah), Alaipauthey (Saki) Rahman silenced his critics and transmogrified them into his fans.

    The reason for A. R. Rahman becoming so successful could be attributed to, his knack for creating foot-tapping music with a different sound, the melodious arias also were unique due the western orchestraisation with an ethnic touch. His songs also stood out due to his usage of fresh voice instead of the tried and tested singers.

    Entrance of Rahman paved the way for new breed of singers like Hema Sardesai (Awara Bhanware), Minmini (Dil Hai Chotasa), Sukhvinder Singh (Dholna), Ronu Majumdar (Shabba Shabba), Shanker Mahadevan (Jumbalika), Sreeniwas (Oh La La La); etc. He also consolidated positions of established singers like Udit Narayan (E Ajnabi), Sonu Nigam (Satrangi Re), Kavita Krishnamurty (Kehta Hai), S. P. Balasubramanium (Anjali Anjali)and Hariharan (Thoda Thoda Pyar). He also has the privilege of working with living legends like Lata Mangeshkar (Jiya Jale, Ik Tu Hi Bharonsa) and Asha Bhosle (Rangeela Re, Tanha Tanha) he also worked with the late Pakistani Sufi Legend Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan (Chanda Suraj Lakhon Tare).

    Other chief traits of Rahman that separates him from the rest is his habit of recording songs late at nights which leaves many egoistic producer directors grumbling. Rahman takes his own sweet time to compose songs, Rahman prefers recording in his Madras studio a hassle for Bollywood producer. Nevertheless the results are worth the trouble.

    Currently the one to be fascinated with A. R. Rahman's music is none other than Andrew Lloyd Webber who is producing an English play 'Bombay Dreams' which will have music by A. R. Rahman. Michael Jackson also rendered his voice for a Rahman tune! With a resume so good even sky is not the limit for this small wonder.


    (Source : http://in.nazaramusic.lycosasia.com)

    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago

    Profile and Interview


    AR Rahman is one of the foremost musical artists in India. In a music industry dominated by film scores, Rahman has churned out more than two dozen hit singles over a span of 8 films, all of which surpassed sales of 2.5 million units. With his mop of dusky curls, t-shirt and jeans, he looks like a teenage college student, but his first film score, Roja, fetched him the National Film Award in 1992 (similar to an Oscar), and thrust him into the limelight. In the five years since Roja, he has created music for blockbuster Indian films including Roja, Pudhiya Mugam, Gentleman, Kizhaku Seemaiyilae, Duet, Kadalan, Bombay, May, Madham, Indian, Muthu kadhal Dasam, Love Birds and others. His 1995 soundtrack for Bombay crossed 5 million units and Rahman had arrived as the "King of Indian Pop" with sales of more than 40 million albums over a period of 3 years.

    AR Rahman is today the most sought after music director in the business. Roja proved that traditional tunes can also be blockbuster hits. Songs such as "Thiruda Thiruda", "Gentleman", "Rangeela", "Kadhal Desam" and "Minsara Kanavu" established him as a prodigy. Modest, religious and totally dedicated to his craft, Rahman has a great penchant for fusing music of different traditions. Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, reggae, rock and Carnatic music are his musical preferences.

    His inspirational, infectious numbers have won him nationwide praise in India. The Tamil film Minsara Kanavu got Rahman the award for Best Music at the 44th National in May, '97. Rahman also been honored with a Rajat Kamal Award for Best Music Director, the Filmfare award, Cinema Express award, Telegu Academy Purashkar award for the year 1992-94, Bommai Nagi Reddy award, Sumu award, Rajiv Gandhi awards and others.

    Renowned world artists including Nusrat Fateh Al Khan, with whom he performs a duet on Vande Mataram, have hailed Rahman as a musical genius. Rahman has in collaborations with artists such as L. Shankar, Zakir Hussain, David Byrne, Talvin Singh and Apache Indian - both recording and on tour. On a recent trip to India, David Byrne met Rahman and was so impressed that he went on to record some sessions with Rahman for a project he is currently completing (as yet unreleased).

    Singing has always been Rahman's personal passion and very few of his fans are that he has sung on a number of his film tracks. Vande Mataram, his first pop album, will also be the first to showcase Rahman the singer, and his ambition is to put his unique Indian sound on the world music stage. Today, Rahman restricts his work to only 2 or 3 film tracks a year and has made only a few live stage in recent years. A sold out concert was held in Kuala Lampur (Malaysia) in October 1996, where he performed to an audience of 40,000 fans.

    AR Rahman, 30 years old, was born into a musically affluent family. His father, K.A. Sekar, was a well known music director based in the Southern India. Growing up in a background filled with music, Rahman began playing music from his early childhood. After his father died when he was only 9, Rahman began performing on the keyboards, and later as an accompaniest for various music directors in the South Indian film industry including Ramesh Naidu, M S Viswanathan and Illaiyaraja. His work with these musicians placed him in good stead through some very difficult years. Finally, Rahman overcame these hardships and qualified for a scholarship to the Trinity College of Music (London).

    Afterwards, Rahman returned to Madras with a dream to bring an international and contemporary world perspective to Indian music. He established a state of the art sound and recording studio and began experimenting in sound engineering, design and production. He also began a collection of sound samples, creating one of the most comprehensive sonic libraries in Asia.

    Rahman started his commercial musical career in advertising, where he spent 6 years composing jingles. Some of his memorable ad campaigns were with leading Indian corporations such as Parry's, Tata, and Titan Watches. It was a chance meeting at a party with Trilok Sharadha, cousin of Mani Rathnam, brought him in contact with the renowned director and launched his stunning debut as the music director of Roja.

    AR Rahman was born A.S. Duleep Kumar, but adopted the name AR Rahman when he coverted to Islam. Ar Rahman is the first of a thousand names of Allah, and Rahman is a profoundly religious person. As an individual, Rahman leads an extremely devout religious life and credits all his musical inspiration to Allah. He comes across as an extremely reticent and humble individual and says, 'Music speaks, statements don't. Nobody can be completely original because the notes are already there ... from the notes we form a raag and from the raag a tune ... it is a process. As far as possible, to my conscience, I try to be original. The rest is up to Allah.'

    As Rahman considers taking his new project, Vande Mataram, to the world, he reflects on his immense popularity on the sub-continent and whether the rest of the globe will follow his musical lead, "music is international - only cultures are different".



    Indian Music Background [ top ]
    Indian music has been dominated by film music as a genre for years and had settled into a complacent rut towards the late eighties and the early nineties when along came a 25 year old who prefers untrained voices and breathing spaces between beats to the typically layered, cramped orchestration. Within the first couple of years of his Bollywood career AR Rahman established that he was here to stay, with his digitized sound based on pop-rock and reggae fused with traditional Indian - mainly Carnatic-folk idioms. Carnatic is a classical Indian music form whose leading international proponents include L Shankar (the violinist of Shakti fame), M S Subbalakshmi - the vocalist, Vikku Vinayakam (the percussionist from Shakti). To quote one of the leading South Indian music directors, 'Rahman's music is of the computer age. It is digital but intelligent, not just noise. He concentrates on his melody and has not deviated totally from his traditional sounds."



    Questions & Answers [ top ]
    Given below are a few excerpts from interviews he has given over the last few years. Sources - The Hindu - a leading daily.

    Q. How did you come into films?
    A. My father, R K Shekar was a music director in Malayalam films. He assisted Salil Chowdary, Devrajan and others. He died when I was nine. At eleven I came into the field, playing on the keyboards and later as an accompanist. I worked under various music directors in Tamil, Telegu and Malayalam- Ramesh Naidu, MS Vishwanathan and IllayarajA. It started becoming a bit monotonous. I thought advertising would be a good alternative. This went on for three years. I built my studio and took to different forms of music- pop, rock and so on. It was then that I met producer Tirlok Shardha, cousin of Mani Rathnam at a party. He (Mani) came to my studio and heard some of my tunes. We agreed to work together though we did not decide on which movie. Only later he told me it was to be Roja, which he directing for K Balachander.

    Q. Despite your success you do not seem to be working on a lot of films?
    A. Rather than making money I believe in making people happy, all other things are secondary. That is why I am not interested in al Lot of movies but only in one at a time. I like directors whom I can vibe with. Ten years of experience in this field has made me quite frustrated. I've evolved a technique, which requires a lot of time. Other music directors record a song in 7-8 hours. But I am different. We do a basic sitting and we record it. We record the voice and I add instrument by instrument to improve the quality.

    Q. Do you use computers in your film tracks?
    A. No, not computers. The technique is different. In fact they say the music in Roja was computerized. As I said earlier the recording takes time. You can hear the same flute in a different way. It is not computerized music. Nearly 40% "Veerapandi Kottayily" (a song from "Thiruda Thiruda") that does not sound like computer music and "Vellai Mazhai (from Roja) is synthesizer oriented. I do not restrict the musicians but ask them to play whatever they feel. Then I record what I want. I spend a lot of time on lyrics too. It takes around 4 days. We write something in the first instance and then improve. So it take about a week to complete a song.

    Q. You say you are choosy in your projects, but you also go in for populist songs. Why so?
    A. Different people need different songs. I want to go down to the people at various levels. When I toured Tamil Nadu, I found that people wanted songs that would make them happy. There is nothing vulgar in my songs. I want my music to reach everywhere. If I play rock, only youngsters will understand, while older people will say, "Why is he shouting like this?" Each category of music reaches only one circle; for the class audience "Thiruda Thiruda" and for the masses "Gentleman". I am learning Carnatic classical music from Dakshinamurthy and Hindustani from Krishnan Nayar. I like traditional music. I want my job to be interesting and fun. I just don't want to get stuck again in monotony.

    Q. Are you being repetitive in your musical style?
    A. In recent times I've done films with a similar outlook. These films are aimed at the young generation and therefore have to be beat oriented. Yet I've tried for a distinct sound every time. After Bombay I haven't got stuck in the hip-hop groove. What I did for Rangeela and Indian were zestful and fast paced but quite unlike Bombay. As for the gentler paced songs of 'Kadhal Desam' if you care to notice they are rooted in melody.

    Q. What are your views on the Indian film music scene today?
    A. Its going through a cyclical process. The techno stuff has reached a saturation point. Soon we'll be back to simple and soulful melodies. When you here the songs of 'Aanandam' you'll see I've used an acoustic rather than an electronic base on three of the songs.

    Q. How does it feel to be on the top (of the film music industry)?
    A. I don't really think I'm at the top. Basically I came into this field not intrude on anybody else's success.

    Q. What music do you like?
    A. Bach, Beethoven and Mozart and Carnatic music. I was into rock and fusion. I like to bring all these into my music.

    Q. Your views on film music in India?
    A. Film music in India is like pop music in the West. Movies are the channels for this music.

    (Source : www.sonymusic.com)

    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago

    Interview : A.R. Rahman


    A man of few words, A R Rahman has always preferred his music to do the talking. And how! From being touted as the most exciting composer in India, he is now on the verge of receiving international acclaim, with no less than Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber rooting for him. We caught up with Rahman when he was in Bombay recently.

    Question:
    You have always come up with exceptional scores for Mani Rathnam. Do you personally think that you've given your best for him?

    A.R.Rahman:

    See, the main thing is the concept that the director has. He (Mani Rathnam) has always given me things which I have not done before. He has been quite an important person in my career, and he always wants me to excel, whether they are for his films or others' films. When challenging things are given to you, then you devote all your energy to it. He never tells you that 'I want a song like this or that,' but he always has a fresh idea. That's the reason why different scores come up for his films.

    Andrew Lloyd Webber thinks that Chaiyya chaiyya is a great number, one of the greatest songs he has ever heard. What do you think about it?

    Question:
    He said it's one of the greatest numbers, yes. I think it's a very commercial song. He (Webber) finds the whole genre of music -- the production, picturisation of the song in "Dil Se" - very interesting. Hopefully, we'll do more exciting stuff now.

    A.R.Rahman:
    When we talk about film music, we talk chiefly about how the masses appreciate it. Now, do you think your music will be more critically examined, simply because it will be heard by a different strata of society?

    See, I always live with a song, sometimes for a week, sometimes for six months, to try and fix whatever is wrong with it. Because, if I don't like something, people will not like it either. I've gone by that rule and so far, it's been working. God was kind. That's how I'm going to do this (Bombay Dreams) also. I'm not going to try something I don't know about. I assume they will like it.

    Question:
    Is there going to be something elitist about a musical?


    A.R.Rahman:
    The only difference is that it's going to be in English. I'm yet to know (laughs) -- about any other differences, because this is a completely new direction for me. But on the whole, I think -- hopefully, God-willing -- it will be successful.

    Question:
    Are you looking at Hollywood as well?

    A.R.Rahman:
    Not now. I don't have the energy to do too many things at the same time. I'll probably finish this first.

    Question:
    But you are taking a sabbatical from Hindi and regional films, aren't you?

    A.R.Rahman:
    I've done my homework on the films which are yet to be released. So there's not going to be a vacuum. It's not like you are not going to hear A R Rahman's music for one year. I've almost completed Lagaan, Zubeida, Kandu Konden..., Alai Payuthey, Rhythm. All these films will be coming now, filling up the gap.

    Question:
    And you are not accepting any other offers right now?

    A.R.Rahman:
    Not yet. I'm just holding them, so that I get some space

    Question:
    Taal was a very big hit. How come you aren't working with Subhash Ghai again for his new film, Yaadein?

    A.R.Rahman:
    I was supposed to, but then this project came up. So I told him about it and we agreed that we'll find time in future and work together.

    Question:
    There's this allegation that you are a composer who has mastered the gadgets -- how do you react to this?

    A.R.Rahman:
    I think it's just an extra attribute or whatever (laughs). But it's not the only thing. Because without tunes, without happening tunes, it will not work. Only if you have a happening tune, then everything else can support it. Knowing the computer actually helps to perfect things. If somebody has gone off-key but delivered a good line with the right feel, you don't have to sacrifice the take. You can just cut it at the pitch and use it. These are what I have learnt to make things easier, to get the best out of an artiste.

    Question:
    Some people have accused you of being repetitive.

    A.R.Rahman:
    I don't think they will say that now, because I have been into too many wild things. Hopefully, they won't say it again in future.

    Question:
    But was there a phase when you felt you were being repetitive?

    A.R.Rahman:
    Well, yes. Following the success of Kadalan (or Hum Se Muqabla in Hindi), a kind of dance culture developed. Suddenly, there were proposals with Prabhu Deva and me together, because that helped sell the films. I was forced to do only dance music. But then I got out of it and accepted films which demanded melody. You know sometimes, you kind of get into it... without realising

    Question:
    Do you have some idea about the kind of music you will be doing for "Bombay Dreams"?

    A.R.Rahman:
    Yes, we do have some scratches ready. If I tell you more about it, then there won't be any surprise left. But it is going to be Indian. It should be exciting, that's all I can say now.

    Question:
    Will there be Indian singers involved in the production?

    A.R.Rahman:
    There will be Asian singers, since part of the cast will be Asian.

    Question:
    A lot has been said about "Chaiyya chaiyya". People attribute the song to you, but it has been inspired by something else... what made you choose this song?

    A.R.Rahman:
    Yeah, it's a Sufi song. Any great love song, when attributed to a divine source, gets an extra dimension. People say any love which is immortal is divine love. Chaiyya chaiyya is something like that. The inspiration, therefore, is a divine one.

    (Source : www.pondicherry.com)

    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago

    We ought to think bigger



    His music suggests a flamboy-ant and aggressive creator, but A.R. Rahman comes across as an extremely patient, polite-to-a-fault and completely untouched-by-fame individual. His dark locks frame his cherubic face and fall to his shoulders in total disarray. As he talks, he impatiently pushes back the strands. That apart, he doesn't fidget or shift, and appears at peace with himself and his world of music. Excerpts from an interview conducted at his office in Kodambakkam, Chennai:

    Now that you will begin work with internationally acclaimed geniuses like Andrew Lloyd Webber and Shekher Kapur, how does it feel?
    I think Indian music is spreading, and the world is accepting something from this country. Spanish music took over with Ricky Martin. It is a cycle. The world has been accepting something from India for the last couple of years.

    It has also got to do with the growth of the South Asian community all over the world. Even film collections have gone up, beginning with Dil Se.

    How did it feel receiving the Padma Shri?
    I feel greatly honoured. Since I am going abroad, I feel really happy that I got it now. For the first time, a music director has been given this award, which makes it really good.

    Are you satisfied with the way your career has shaped up?
    The way it took off, it seems it was destined. Mani Ratnam, who had sworn he wouldn't sign a music director other than Ilayaraja, came to me. So my career started on a high. After that everything had to go beyond that; it pushed me to do something more. I am not a very ambitious person who says I want to do this, this and this. I think God has been very kind to me. He has given me the best.

    But did you expect things to turn out the way they did?
    It is very unusual. I started my career thinking that Roja would be my last film. I was not interested in doing films. I had been in it for almost 15 years with my father, playing for other people. I didn't want to go through that again. I wanted something different in my life.

    Such as?
    Maybe I would have got into experimental kind of music. But there is no market for those things. Then film music opened up. It was no longer the same clichd kind of thing. Different directors came who wanted something new; people also wanted something new and accepted whatever experiments we did. That changed my opinion. Films reach more people, there is more money involved.

    How would you define your kind of music?
    How can I define my music? It is a reflection of how I began my life, the good and bad things that happened. I can't say this is my life and this is how I intended it to be. It came naturally. I don't plan anything.

    When we started Roja we wanted to create something people had never heard before, at the same time maintaining a standard in lyrics and melody. Something told me it would become a big success; I was travelling in the same boat as Mani Ratnam and the music would be noticed. That it was accepted was a blessing. Mani Ratnam opened up a big thing for me and I owe it to him. There is a lot of freedom when I work with Mani.

    After Roja things only went uphill?
    Well, almost. There was a lot of confusion. When I listened to criticism or suggestions from people, I had to learn what to take and what to reject. At times it was very hard. Whatever plus we had would be criticised. We had to decide that this is our plus and we should not leave it. We should continue with the style and the more we continue with it, the more it will register.

    Have you become more confident of your music?
    No, I am never confident. Sometimes it takes me two or three days, sometimes three months, to get the sound right. Sometimes things go wrong always. But once it is fixed then it's fine.

    Your father must have been a major influence on you?
    Yeah. He was the first one in India to buy a synthesiser. He bought it from Singapore in 1973, I think, and being the first buyer, he got a free ticket to Japan. So I had all this stuff to play with. He died in 1976.

    After that you were pushed into music?
    In a way. (Laughs.) Initially it was just work. At the age of 14 or 15, I would have preferred going somewhere else. But I had to work with people over the age of 40. In some ways I was the next generation and at the same time I was not. In a way I got the best of both worlds. (Laughs.)

    What does music mean to you?
    So far I have just been catering to film scripts. Sometimes I have given to films ideas which I had for an album. For some of Mani Ratnam's films I had certain ideas and it fitted into the script. For instance I wanted to do a theme like Bombay, which would be a reflection of the incident, to create a symphony kind of piece. In Roja the song Tamizha Tamizha though out of the script fitted into it.

    What excites you about a project first?
    With a good director, irrespective of the script, the rapport will be good. That makes it interesting, and the music will also be good. It is a problem if the person is somewhere else and I am here.

    What triggers the creative process in you?
    When I am mentally disturbed I pray. Before starting a session that gives me a vacuum to start with, rather than having something predetermined which might misguide me. It is almost like starting from square one. But it makes my job interesting and when I sit there something gets triggered off inside me.

    I belive that every individual, even an atom, can move only with the will of God. I don't take credit for doing all this. If I did, then I would fall flat.

    Don't external factors like family affect your concentration?
    Yeah, they do. But when it comes to music you forget everything. The magic of music and prayer. You are almost on another trip. Only when you finish do you get back.

    You seem to be very religious...
    (Pauses.) I believe that every individual, even an atom, can move only with the will of God. I don't take any credit for doing all this.

    You sound very level-headed for a man who has earned so much fame and money so quickly?
    It is balance... well, it is almost contradictory. You want fame, but once you get it you lose your head. So just leave it to God and carry on with your work. It makes it all easy. If I put it in my head that I did it, then I fall flat because I can't take the next step.

    Why did you convert?
    (A long pause.) My dad went through a lot of problems. He was sick, my childhood was a disaster. I spent most of my childhood in hospitals. There came a stage when the family was almost down. We met a pir sahab at that time. It is inexplicable. It just happened. My idea of God coincided with all this. I thought, 'Okay, this was something that was bound to happen.'

    You have never regretted it?
    See, there are a lot of things involved. God and religion are very personal. Now it has become politics. I don't think I want to talk any more on it. (Laughs.)

    But you agree that religion has become politicised?
    I think religion should be left to a person. The mosque or temple should be within oneself. That is the best thing.

    What about the controversy over Vande Mataram?
    It depends on how you take it. Vande Mataram is about a mother and the message is peace be upon you. The mother is the country and when you say peace be upon you it goes beyond politics. That is the way I take it.

    When one makes something there is always the good and the bad. You just take the good. In the album I have put not only this, but a nicer version of it in a more serene way. It is not as if it will replace anything. The main reasons for doing it were my friends Bharat Bala and Kanika. We wanted to give something to the youth. We felt there was nothing, no song that this MTV generation could relate to, something they could identify with.

    Given the amount of work music composers do, is it inevitable that they repeat themselves?
    You never know because you can't always be careful. You can't predict when something comes out of you. It is a feeling and I can't keep a constant check on and stop things coming and say let me not play now. Later somebody says this is similar to that, and then you change it. It happens sometimes. Mostly the director checks all that. I don't give the director just one choice. There are always lots of choices.

    How important is the Tamil identity to you?
    I hate the discrimination between south, north, Tamil, Hindi. If I represent India that is good enough for me. Of course, I have always been here. But we should cross all these barriers and think bigger. I get very irritated with this kind of thinking.

    But has your Tamil identity given you anything special?
    Definitely. But I see the entire world as a living place. Suddenly a category called world music has come and we are all able to relate to it. In all probability in a couple of years all the cultures will meet. There won't be any English or Tamil music. We will all be able to relate to 'music'. That is the ultimate thing.

    So will you give up on film music?
    God knows. (Laughs.)

    How do you cope with your unorthodox working hours?
    There is so much disturbance during the day. To create music you need peace and in my style of work if I turn my face away even once, I have to start from the beginning. So night time suits me. I finish off my other work by 10 p.m. and start with my sound engineer and maybe the director also.

    The directors never crib?
    (Laughs.) As long as the work is done they don't crib.

    What about your family?
    It has been like this for a long time. So they don't bother.

    Tell us about your family and the kind of support they offer you.
    I have two daughters. My wife doesn't work. My wife and mother listen to my music and give me feedback.

    Do you get time to spend with them?
    I work from my house. So it helps.

    How do you relax?
    It comes naturally. When you push yourself hard for 2 or 3 months, then you have to take a break. I go out with my family.

    Don't you get recognised and mobbed when you go out?
    But then I don't go to places where there are people. (Laughs.)"

    Why is black your favourite colour? You also wear your hair long...
    I thought both suit me. (Laughs heartily.)

    (Source : www.the-week.com)

    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago
    A R Rahman is the undisputed king of Indian music. A shy guy from Chennai with long curly hair, he took the music scene by storm in 1992, and hasn't looked back ever since.

    Rahman brought a new sound to film music, fusing folk, rustic melody with foot-tapping music. And the Rahman clich has had fans swooning, from Roja, Rangeela, Bombay, Dil Se and Kandukondain kandukondain to Alai payuthey, Zubeida, Meenaxi and Yuva.

    Trying times

    Hailed as a musical genius, the prodigy had a tough childhood. He was born as Duleep Kumar on January 6, 1966 in Madras (now Chennai) to Kareema Begum and K A Sekar. He later embraced Islam and changed his name to Allah Rakha Rahman.

    Rahman's father was an arranger and conductor of Malyalam film music, but he passed away when his son was barely nine-years-old. Despite this personal loss, Rahman held on to his music and at 11, began playing the keyboard for a well-known troupe.

    He then went on to play with renowned artists like Kunnakudi Vaidyanathan and Zakir Hussain. He also earned a scholarship to the coveted Trinity College Of Music, University of Oxford, where he studied Western Classical music.

    At 16, he quit school and began working full-time as a session musician on soundtracks, under the popular south Indian composer, Illaiyaraja.

    Rahman also set up a recording studio, where he experimented with his own kind of sound. He even tried his hand at television commercials, eventually composing over 300 jingles in just five years (including the famous one for Titan watches)!

    His first break in movies came with Mani Ratnam's Roja. Roja became an instant hit, and the music director won a National Award for it.

    On higher ground...

    Rahman soon became a star to reckon with -- music albums would create record sales just on the Rahman tag. From 1992-97, he created music for many a blockbuster, including Pudhiya Mugam, Gentleman, Kizhaku Seemaiyilae, Duet, Kadalan, Bombay, Indian and others. His soundtrack for Bombay crossed the 5-million sales mark, and Rahman sold more than 40 million copies over a period of three years.

    During 1997-2000, Rahman continued to ride high on the waves of success with soundtracks like Dil Se, Taal, Jeans, Thakshak, Sapnay, Dil hi dil mein, Kabhi na kabhi and Earth among others. If any of these albums failed, it was probably due to the failure of the movies at the box office rather than the music.

    At this time, Rahman also teamed up with Bharat Bala to produce Vandemataram -- an album that paid tribute to India's 50th year of independence. The album featured Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan in the vocals, and met with resounding success, selling over a million copies.

    Turn of the millennium

    By the new millennium, Rahman's popularity was at its peak. His new films also revealed a subtle shift in style, as he began experimenting with newer sounds. Rahman appeared keen to prove his versatility to his critics.

    While Pukar, Lagaan, Saathiya, Zubeidaa and Meenaxi veered towards a very Indian folk-classical feel, Tehzeeb, Yuva and Lakeer featured a generous helping of trance and hip-hop.

    Rahman also broke boundaries in 2000 by composing the music for Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical, Bombay Dreams.

    And for Rahman fans, surely the best is still to come, as the music director gears up to redefine the standards in Bollywood music with Subhash Ghai's Kisna, Ashutosh Gowariker's Swades and Ketan Mehta's Rising, amongst others.

    This maestro is clearly set to give us many more years of music and melody.
    dayita thumbnail
    19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
    Posted: 19 years ago
    Film
    Album: Rang De Basanti
    Music: AR Rehman
    Label: N/A

    - Sumita Chatterjee

    AR Rehman is known for the innovations he does with all his compositions. Whenever his name is attached to any music album, the expectations are always high.

    He was the man behind the soulful music of Aamir Khan starrer Rangeela, Lagaan and The Rising. Now the duo is back again with Rakeysh Mehra's Rang De Basanti. This time they have roped in Prasoon Joshi along with Javed Akhtar to pen the lyrics.

    The album begins with a devotional song Ik Onkar, sung beautifully by Harshdeep Kaur. The track is short but is very soothing. Quite an auspicious beginning – one can say!

    Next to follow is the power-packed title track Rang De Basanti sung by the Punjab da munda, Daler Mehandi himself. The baadshah of bhangra pop has for the first time teamed up with AR Rehman and the outcome is nothing less than explosive. The musical arrangement and Daler's voice makes the song just intoxicating. It has become one of the regulars at the discs too.

    Paathshala sung by Naresh Iyer and Mohammad Aslam, makes one nostalgic about the school and college days. It showcases the carefree and rebellious attitude of the Gen Xers. The other version, Paathshala: Be a rebel has rapper Blaaze joining Aslam and Naresh. Blaaze has also written the English lyrics of the song. It is a hard-core rock number.

    Tu Bin Bataye is a soft romantic number, which has the voices of Madhushree and Naresh Iyer. Madhushree is the same voice which did wonders for the song Kabhi Neem Neem from Yuva. Written by Prasoon Joshi the song has a very Indian feel to it.

    Luka Chupi is the track sung by the legendary Lata Mangeshkar. The song has a brilliant orchestra by AR Rehman, which also compliments the mood of the song. Khoon Chala, by Mohit Chauhan of Silk Route, belongs to the Indipop variety and is very melodious. Rubaroo too belongs to the same genre. Sung by AR Rehman himself, this song has a very trendy feel to it.

    Finally those who have been waiting eagerly for the Aamir Khan song, this one is a bit disappointing. Aamir has narrated a few lines in Lalkaar. His husky voice and words like Sarfaroshi Ki Tamanna adds on to the patriotic flavour of the album.

    Rang De Basanti is not for the masses but is rather a music collector's piece. A must buy!!!



    http://www.ndtv.com/ent/newreviewmusic.asp?category=hindi&am p;am p;am p;id=89&albumname=Rang+De+Basanti Average viewer rating:
    (519 Votes)

    </>
    Edited by dayita - 19 years ago

    Related Topics

    Top

    Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

    Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

    Add to Home Screen!

    Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".