Does tiltilations mean Passion?

Hi friends,

Which MN scene are you referring to in this connection??? Anything from recent epis or is it the older issues??

Cuz the kiss epi has already been discussed endlessly and that was a case of bad camera angles more than anything else.

Hugs and a lot of staring are by no means titillating from any definition as far as I know....that is just standard modus operandi in all 'romantic' scenes shown in any show.

They haven't really shown any physical intimacy b/w MN even though they are the technically more passionate pair in this show....what's shown more often is silly childish 'romantic' antics like that eyesore of a date to name a few....

If you really want to know what titillation is, try watching the other show on Star One about 'doctors ;-)

Originally posted by: nureat01

Which MN scene are you referring to in this connection??? Anything from recent epis or is it the older issues??

Cuz the kiss epi has already been discussed endlessly and that was a case of bad camera angles more than anything else.

Hugs and a lot of staring are by no means titillating from any definition as far as I know....that is just standard modus operandi in all 'romantic' scenes shown in any show.

They haven't really shown any physical intimacy b/w MN even though they are the technically more passionate pair in this show....what's shown more often is silly childish 'romantic' antics like that eyesore of a date to name a few....

If you really want to know what titillation is, try watching the other show on Star One about 'doctors ;-)

Originally posted by: -Rinky-

Hi friends,

I have been seeing that there has been a blast of hugs, close proximity and a kiss with a lot of staring in MJHT recently when it comes to MN.. I have heard that MN are the passionate pair, the older matured pair so all the physical intimacy is based on them..

My question is - does physical intimacy or titilations mean passion?? passion according to me signifies a drive or urge to achieve something... similarly for physical passion, its about the completion of romantic love.. a stage that leads to deep bonding and attachment.. a way of loosing inhibitions of all kinds among lovers...

But the passion in MN storyline is plain sleezy, too course, done without any aesthetic sense.. I see no sensuality, it feels as if the makers are putting them in to gain cheap publicity...Seriously i do not see the need of such scenes........Passion can be portayed with simple gestures, they need to OTT and grotesque...

So what do you think guys, are MN really getting the true treatment of passion or is it plain sleeze?

Do comment ....am waiting...

LOLL rinky! don't mind the odd kiss or hug here and there...as such I feel it MUST be a part of romance...esp in the teen years...and if done properly and aesthetically...it can look very sensual and also very cute. For example, look at the Shahid-Kareena kiss at the end of Jab We Met. Did that look grotesque or vulgar to you?

BUT, I shall SCREAM if they show that slip-fall-catch routine ONE more time! And I mean it not just for MN..but for ANY star one couple!

Hmmm...the problem with MN storyline...for me...is not the "passionate" kisses or the hugs...but the way they have been shown....and also ofcourse...the backstory....the "why" of the kiss or the hug.

In Jab We Met, the kiss took place...and it had a fantastic backstory...here the girls fall for no reason and then they fall straight into the guy's arms...it is so exasperating!

As such....I don't find that mch sleaziness in MN story....except when N suddenly slips and M catches her and they stare. As fr the rest of the scenes, I would call them silly...rather than sleazy! 😉

Originally posted by: nureat01

Which MN scene are you referring to in this connection??? Anything from recent epis or is it the older issues??

Cuz the kiss epi has already been discussed endlessly and that was a case of bad camera angles more than anything else.

Hugs and a lot of staring are by no means titillating from any definition as far as I know....that is just standard modus operandi in all 'romantic' scenes shown in any show.

They haven't really shown any physical intimacy b/w MN even though they are the technically more passionate pair in this show....what's shown more often is silly childish 'romantic' antics like that eyesore of a date to name a few....

If you really want to know what titillation is, try watching the other show on Star One about 'doctors ;-)

@bold- That is the paragon of titillation ROFL 🤣🤣🤣

Originally posted by: Eloquent

As such....I don't find that mch sleaziness in MN story....except when N suddenly slips and M catches her and they stare. As fr the rest of the scenes, I would call them silly...rather than sleazy! 😉

'

Exactly what I was trying to say as well😆😆😆 The scenes are more silly and wannabeish than actually sleazy....they make me roll my eyes at the cheesiness....the trip/catch scenes are not sleazy in my opinion either....those are just cliched 'romantic' scenes....where's the sleaze in them??😕😆

Sleaze is the kind of stuff I've seen in another *cough* show on Star One😆

@Rinky: I don't like the bits when M jerks her to him but that's got more to do with how it's shot....there's not anything sleazy about it rather it looks awkward, that's all.

As for the shirtless cornering....let's leave that out of this unless it becomes a recurring event...which it thankfully so far hasn't.

Originally posted by: -Rinky-

yeah i have seen the show based on doctors and i think thats almost adult stuff going by indian tv standard...to me tiltilations are the new scenes,, where maynk repeatedly pulls nupur towards himself.. the shirt changing scene where he cornered her... the rehearsel scene where he made her say yes by cornering her against a wall...the sudden hugs which I find pretty random...

their older scenes were OK to me.... tho M falling on N or viceversa repeatedly didnt quite impress me.....

@bold- OMG....now that I remember THAT scene...it was so yucky!!! Ewwwwwwww!!!!

You know, again, this same scene could have been shown in a better, cute, much more sensual way.

For the first thing, M should have had his shirt ON him! There was no need for him to go shirtless.

Also, rather than the relentless staring which I found sleazy also, I felt if M had smiled at her....looked at her, the way she looks at her, you know, with one eyebrow raised, and the beginnings of a slight smile upon his face....making her blush....then the scene would have looked cute!

Again, the problem is with execution...

@eloquent-

Originally posted by: nureat01

'

Exactly what I was trying to say as well😆😆😆 The scenes are more silly and wannabeish than actually sleazy....they make me roll my eyes at the cheesiness....the trip/catch scenes are not sleazy in my opinion either....those are just cliched 'romantic' scenes....where's the sleaze in them??😕😆

Sleaze is the kind of stuff I've seen in another *cough* show on Star One😆

@Rinky: I don't like the bits when M jerks her to him but that's got more to do with how it's shot....there's not anything sleazy about it rather it looks awkward, that's all.

As for the shirtless cornering....let's leave that out of this unless it becomes a recurring event...which it thankfully so far hasn't.

Originally posted by: nureat01

Which MN scene are you referring to in this connection??? Anything from recent epis or is it the older issues??

Cuz the kiss epi has already been discussed endlessly and that was a case of bad camera angles more than anything else.

Hugs and a lot of staring are by no means titillating from any definition as far as I know....that is just standard modus operandi in all 'romantic' scenes shown in any show.

They haven't really shown any physical intimacy b/w MN even though they are the technically more passionate pair in this show....what's shown more often is silly childish 'romantic' antics like that eyesore of a date to name a few....

If you really want to know what titillation is, try watching the other show on Star One about 'doctors ;-)