Right...What Raghav doing is morally wrong but practically i don't find any other closure of what other than Raghav is doing... If we put in Pallavi's shoes, she is exactly doing what she should do minus what she did with Sulochana.. she never thought of questioning Sulochana for her act.. leave about herself but Keerthi?? Anyways there she is spectator and its all about Raghav and family call.. When we put in Raghav's shoes, he did all that he can suppress the crime which is morally wrong but now when he knows that it's out of his hand, he wants to surrender himself so that Pallavi and family can be at ease.. what I still feel is if it was not Pallavi involved and some other random family member of Mandar got this crime unmasked, he would have definitely planted fake person to take up the guilt by compensating him... How can he just let go his family member suffer for whom he craved for 10 long years while Pallavi is craving for the family of 2 years.. but here Pallavi burden is more as the one who was dead is her husband and she lost her whole life in that sense...
This is very much of a good example of moral conflicts and the emotional conflicts... A very much potential track.. there can be ample of dialogues that can happen but makers kaha dikhayenge... I heard similar track is in YHM but there the person wasnt dead... So no much hallabol...
I somewhere agree with Raghav's word about why past to be uncovered when it can ruin your present and future?? The dead cannot return but then it's morally very much wrong... If the truth is uncovered, then no one will be happy... Pallavi and Raghav are the main people who will be affected badly emotional and relationships wise and rest are collateral damage... Just a thought crosses my mind... Why both Pallavi and Raghav are insensitive to Amma and her grief if any of Raghav or Keerthi are in prison???