Who thinks that was the wrong decision? - Page 2

Originally posted by: S.Stephy

While it was unfortunate, I don't think it was a wrong decision. It is a competition... and contestants are judged based on the dish they make in that particular round and not based on their performance throughout the series. That is how the rules are. And in such situations, one small mistake can turn the tables at any moment for anyone... sad that it had to be Koku for this round... and that too this early in the competition...

Do agree with judges decision.That was not khuko's day.This is competition .

The competition was fair,Khoku's dish was poor.I wanted her 2 stay but this time fortune didn't help her at all.

tats the prob i ve with the master chef fmt both indian & the international editions. ideally i feel points must b given for each dish so that at the end of the week the bottom 3 folks fight it out.

many times i ve noticed good cooks ve 1 bad day & they get eliminated irrespective of their consistent performance so far 😕

Originally posted by: Angels11

tats the prob i ve with the master chef fmt both indian & the international editions. ideally i feel points must b given for each dish so that at the end of the week the bottom 3 folks fight it out.

many times i ve noticed good cooks ve 1 bad day & they get eliminated irrespective of their consistent performance so far 😕

agree...If yesterday was not elimination round I feel Khoku wil get another good chance n 'danger zone' and sumtime she myt have safe

I am not against dis decision...but wat if all good cooks geting eliminated becoz of deir bad perfomance and average cook like navneet reach finals 🤢

i dont think its wrong,we did not taste the food ,judges did.so they knw well. felt very bad for khoku,bt its rule.one has to leave

she really knows how to balance flavors, but i guess it was a bad day for her

After yesterday's episode,I agree it's scripted.Khoku did not deserve to be eliminated.